Since no one seems opposed to this I’ll make the branch today. I’ll track
it on HIVE-17159, the umbrella JIRA for the standalone metastore.
On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 4:17 PM, Owen O'Malley
wrote:
> Alan,
>That sounds reasonable. Having development branches rebase relatively
> often leads to a
Alan,
That sounds reasonable. Having development branches rebase relatively
often leads to a much cleaner final git history that using multiple merges.
For the first couple rebases of your development branch, you might want to
tell people just before you do it by sending email out to dev@hive.
I propose that we create a branch to continue the standalone metastore
work in. So far we’ve been doing it in master one patch at a time.
However, the speed that we can produce patches outstrips the speed at which
we can get them reviewed, fully tested, and into master. I would like to
put those
