On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 12:25 PM, Edward Capriolo wrote:
> If you thing hive has "friends" named "DB2, Oracle, teradata, vertica,
> impala" you are wrong.
OK, feel free to replace 'friends' with 'not friends' in that
sentence. That does not change the argument.
If you thing hive has "friends" named "DB2, Oracle, teradata, vertica,
impala" you are wrong.
Besides the fact that some of them originally took the position that map
reduce "was a big step backwards", All of those are commercial products
aiming at selling something to people. That is their core m
I'm +1 for calling it Hive SQL. No one knows what HQL is when they see the
initials. Hive Query Language? Hadoop Query Language? Harold's Query Language?
I agree with Ed that we should be up front about what Hive is and isn't and
about where it's going and where it isn't. Whenever people ask
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 8:39 PM, Edward Capriolo wrote:
> What is in a name? :)
>
> "Which SQL feature you are talking about here, that forces single reducer
> and hence should not be supported?"
>
> Joining on anything besides = comes to mind
>
> Pretty sure the query mentioned here will not work
What is in a name? :)
"Which SQL feature you are talking about here, that forces single reducer
and hence should not be supported?"
Joining on anything besides = comes to mind
Pretty sure the query mentioned here will not work (without being
re-written)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SQL
SELECT i
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 6:52 PM, Edward Capriolo wrote:
> "I see that the hive community intends to make hive SQL compliant and is on
> that path." . I was not under the general impression that we are on that
> path.
Well, whenever we try to decide what the behavior should be, we refer
to what SQL
"I see that the hive community intends to make hive SQL compliant and is on
that path." . I was not under the general impression that we are on that
path.
Someone once told me that supporting full SQL will result in roughly 4
times the parser and planner code. For me that is not a huge win.
Also
I see that the hive community intends to make hive SQL compliant and
is on that path. Just like other databases, it has some extensions to
SQL, and there are some standard features it does not support.
SQL is also one of the strong selling points of hive. But using the
term HiveQL, I think conveys
