[RESULT] WAS Re: [VOTE] Retire the HTrace Podling
I am closing this VOTE off now. Thank you to everyone that VOTE'd. RESULT is as follows [6] +1 retire the HTrace podling Lewis John McGibbney* Sheng Wu Ralph Goers* P. Taylor Goetz* Dave Fisher* Pierre Smits* [0] -1 NOT NOT retire the HTrace podling (please provide justification) * IPMC Binding I'll go ahead and reboot the retirement process. Lewis On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 4:40 PM, lewis john mcgibbneywrote: > Hi Folks, > Please excuse the error on my part, which essentially missed this > important stage of VOTE'ing on general@ for official retirement of the > HTrace Podling. > However, we are here now. The VOTE will be open for a minimum of 72 hours. > The previous community VOTE [0] took place on the HTrace dev@ list with a > lot of participation. I closed this off today with the RESULT [1]. > I would like to explicitly note that a subsequent parallel thread was > initiated [2] which essentially suggested HTrace staying alive as a > Subproject. Unfortunately this thread petered out... my inclination is that > this outcome is that for HTrace to become a Subproject, essentially work > would need to be done by some people... which brings us back to the initial > reason for drafting the retirement email thread in the first place e.g. > no-one has the time to work on HTrace any more. > Please DISCUSS or VOTE as below > > [ ] +1 retire the HTrace podling > [ ] -1 NOT NOT retire the HTrace podling (please provide justification) > > Thanks, > Lewis > P.S. Here is my +1 > > > [0] VOTE: https://s.apache.org/2sGB > [1] RESULT: https://s.apache.org/e22i > [2] https://s.apache.org/MlLn > > -- > http://home.apache.org/~lewismc/ > http://people.apache.org/keys/committer/lewismc > -- http://home.apache.org/~lewismc/ http://people.apache.org/keys/committer/lewismc
Re: [VOTE] Retire the HTrace Podling
+1 (binding) Regards, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Apr 16, 2018, at 6:47 AM, P. Taylor Goetzwrote: > > +1 (binding) > > -Taylor > >> On Apr 16, 2018, at 9:28 AM, Ralph Goers wrote: >> >> +1 (binding) >> >> Ralph >> >>> On Apr 11, 2018, at 4:40 PM, lewis john mcgibbney >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Folks, >>> Please excuse the error on my part, which essentially missed this important >>> stage of VOTE'ing on general@ for official retirement of the HTrace Podling. >>> However, we are here now. The VOTE will be open for a minimum of 72 hours. >>> The previous community VOTE [0] took place on the HTrace dev@ list with a >>> lot of participation. I closed this off today with the RESULT [1]. >>> I would like to explicitly note that a subsequent parallel thread was >>> initiated [2] which essentially suggested HTrace staying alive as a >>> Subproject. Unfortunately this thread petered out... my inclination is that >>> this outcome is that for HTrace to become a Subproject, essentially work >>> would need to be done by some people... which brings us back to the initial >>> reason for drafting the retirement email thread in the first place e.g. >>> no-one has the time to work on HTrace any more. >>> Please DISCUSS or VOTE as below >>> >>> [ ] +1 retire the HTrace podling >>> [ ] -1 NOT NOT retire the HTrace podling (please provide justification) >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Lewis >>> P.S. Here is my +1 >>> >>> >>> [0] VOTE: https://s.apache.org/2sGB >>> [1] RESULT: https://s.apache.org/e22i >>> [2] https://s.apache.org/MlLn >>> >>> -- >>> http://home.apache.org/~lewismc/ >>> http://people.apache.org/keys/committer/lewismc >> >> >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >> >
Re: [VOTE] Retire the HTrace Podling
+1 (binding) -Taylor > On Apr 16, 2018, at 9:28 AM, Ralph Goerswrote: > > +1 (binding) > > Ralph > >> On Apr 11, 2018, at 4:40 PM, lewis john mcgibbney wrote: >> >> Hi Folks, >> Please excuse the error on my part, which essentially missed this important >> stage of VOTE'ing on general@ for official retirement of the HTrace Podling. >> However, we are here now. The VOTE will be open for a minimum of 72 hours. >> The previous community VOTE [0] took place on the HTrace dev@ list with a >> lot of participation. I closed this off today with the RESULT [1]. >> I would like to explicitly note that a subsequent parallel thread was >> initiated [2] which essentially suggested HTrace staying alive as a >> Subproject. Unfortunately this thread petered out... my inclination is that >> this outcome is that for HTrace to become a Subproject, essentially work >> would need to be done by some people... which brings us back to the initial >> reason for drafting the retirement email thread in the first place e.g. >> no-one has the time to work on HTrace any more. >> Please DISCUSS or VOTE as below >> >> [ ] +1 retire the HTrace podling >> [ ] -1 NOT NOT retire the HTrace podling (please provide justification) >> >> Thanks, >> Lewis >> P.S. Here is my +1 >> >> >> [0] VOTE: https://s.apache.org/2sGB >> [1] RESULT: https://s.apache.org/e22i >> [2] https://s.apache.org/MlLn >> >> -- >> http://home.apache.org/~lewismc/ >> http://people.apache.org/keys/committer/lewismc > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
[VOTE] Retire the HTrace Podling
Hi Folks, Please excuse the error on my part, which essentially missed this important stage of VOTE'ing on general@ for official retirement of the HTrace Podling. However, we are here now. The VOTE will be open for a minimum of 72 hours. The previous community VOTE [0] took place on the HTrace dev@ list with a lot of participation. I closed this off today with the RESULT [1]. I would like to explicitly note that a subsequent parallel thread was initiated [2] which essentially suggested HTrace staying alive as a Subproject. Unfortunately this thread petered out... my inclination is that this outcome is that for HTrace to become a Subproject, essentially work would need to be done by some people... which brings us back to the initial reason for drafting the retirement email thread in the first place e.g. no-one has the time to work on HTrace any more. Please DISCUSS or VOTE as below [ ] +1 retire the HTrace podling [ ] -1 NOT NOT retire the HTrace podling (please provide justification) Thanks, Lewis P.S. Here is my +1 [0] VOTE: https://s.apache.org/2sGB [1] RESULT: https://s.apache.org/e22i [2] https://s.apache.org/MlLn -- http://home.apache.org/~lewismc/ http://people.apache.org/keys/committer/lewismc