DRuggeri has a new PGP key

2019-05-11 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
2019-05-11 Key fingerprint = E348 0043 5956 21FE 5610 5F11 2AB1 2A7A DC55 C003 uid Daniel Ruggeri (http://home.apache.org/~druggeri/) uid Daniel Ruggeri uid [jpeg image of size 13027] sub 4096R/14FF4720 2019-05-11 It would

Re: ApacheCon call for presentations, httpd content

2019-05-02 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
Drill Observability Beam *maybe* that has has an effect on folks' submissions? Dunno... I just submitted in "general" -- Daniel Ruggeri On 2019/05/01 20:35:49, Rich Bowen wrote: > Hi, folks. > > The call for presentations for ApacheCon North America closes in a > litt

Re: ApacheCon call for presentations, httpd content

2019-05-01 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
have enough time to develop expertise in mod_md or H2) so keep the suggestions coming. What about a "stupid httpd tricks" kind of talk which is an amalgamation of neat stuff? I'm sure we could come up with at least two dozen examples EASILY. -- Daniel Ruggeri On May 1, 2019 3:35:49 PM

re: svn commit: r33393 - /release/httpd/CHANGES_2.4

2019-04-02 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
The announcement message was also rejected by moderators because we don't have KEYS directly linked on the download page. I will correct both (about three hrs from now) and reattempt announcement. -- Daniel Ruggeri On April 2, 2019 1:01:31 AM CDT, Marion et Christophe JAILLET wrote: >

[RESULT][VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.39

2019-03-30 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
itself! I shall forthwith begin the distribution of the release tarball to the mirrors. -- Daniel Ruggeri On 3/27/2019 10:09 AM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > Hi, all; >    Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ > &g

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.39

2019-03-30 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
On 3/27/2019 10:09 AM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > Hi, all; >    Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ > > I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this > candidate tarball as 2.4.

[VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.39

2019-03-27 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
. [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong. The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are: sha1: e66d6bfea42254e64d3b5009f49ecc486ac46de2 *httpd-2.4.39.tar.gz sha256: 8b95fe249f3a6c50aad3ca125eef3e02d619116cde242e1bc3c266b7b5c37c30 *httpd-2.4.39.tar.gz -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: [NOTICE] Intent to T 2.4.39

2019-03-26 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
On 2019/03/23 13:43:20, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > Hi, all; > >    I see there are several things ready for release in 2.4.x so I'd like > to go ahead and get those things into our community's hands by rolling > in the next few days. > >    Please do shout loudly

[NOTICE] Intent to T 2.4.39

2019-03-23 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
-- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: Incomplete communications of OpenSSL 1.1.1 compatibility?

2019-03-02 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
Updated in r1854645 and published to the site. I made a slight modification to the line I suggested yesterday to note that TLS 1.3 also requires openssl-1.1.1, too. I've also purged the old release from dist in r32727. Thanks for the pointers. Have a great weekend! -- Daniel Ruggeri On 3/1

Re: Incomplete communications of OpenSSL 1.1.1 compatibility?

2019-03-01 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
ed because it is an important feature. I will update the landing page and remove .37 from dist later today or tomorrow morning at the latest (unless someone beats me to it). -- Daniel Ruggeri On February 28, 2019 1:05:40 PM CST, William A Rowe Jr wrote: >I was just updating PR 63212 and could not p

Re: Anyone interested in a freelance opportunity?

2019-02-22 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
On February 22, 2019 5:03:43 AM CST, Ruediger Pluem wrote: > > >On 02/21/2019 12:46 AM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: >> Hi, all; >> I was approached to see if I would be interested/willing to work on >code to support encrypted client keys for the proxy. > >You mean

Anyone interested in a freelance opportunity?

2019-02-20 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
it's an odd thing to ask, but thought it's worth bringing up because I'd personally love to see this functionality :-) Feel free to reply directly to me if you don't want to share with the list. -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: svn commit: r32075 - /dev/httpd/ /release/httpd/

2019-01-22 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
On 2019-01-22 11:39, Daniel Gruno wrote: On 1/22/19 6:08 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: Hi, Cristophe;    Thanks for the extra eye. Fortunately, this is expected behavior. Since the announcement goes out on some future date, the date is fixed up later in the announce.sh script. Daniel, could

Re: svn commit: r32075 - /dev/httpd/ /release/httpd/

2019-01-22 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
Hi, Cristophe; Thanks for the extra eye. Fortunately, this is expected behavior. Since the announcement goes out on some future date, the date is fixed up later in the announce.sh script. -- Daniel Ruggeri On 2019-01-21 13:22, Marion & Christophe JAILLET wrote: Fixed in r32079. I ho

[RESULT][VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.38 PASSED

2019-01-21 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
Community Noel Butler, Dennis Clark I thank everyone for their time in testing and verifying this latest release. I will begin the process of promoting to the mirrors for sync. -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.38

2019-01-21 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
On 1/20/2019 4:25 PM, Noel Butler wrote: > > >> >>   It's not just good, it's good enough! >> >   > tongue in cheek here, but... > shouldn't that be the other way around,  "It's not just good enough, > it's good!"   :) >   haha - tounge in cheek indeed. The line, "It's not just good, it's good

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.38

2019-01-18 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
On 2019-01-17 12:49, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: Hi, all; Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate tarball as 2.4.38: [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's

[VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.38

2019-01-17 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
. [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong. The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are: sha1: 6ee19a7b936a6ddbbf81b313c4a8b38bf232b40e *httpd-2.4.38.tar.gz sha256: 38d0b73aa313c28065bf58faf64cec12bf7c7d5196146107df2ad07541aa26a6 *httpd-2.4.38.tar.gz -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.28

2019-01-17 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
Thank you, folks. I apologize again for the embarrassing mistake. Will be sending along the updated vote email in a few seconds. -- Daniel Ruggeri On 2019-01-17 12:30, Yann Ylavic wrote: We should at the same 2.4.x state as before the release try now, I think the script(s) can be restarted

Re: svn commit: r1851557 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/include/ap_release.h

2019-01-17 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
minutes - with the right version number fed to the machine. -- Daniel Ruggeri On 2019-01-17 11:51, William A Rowe Jr wrote: One problem with scripts, they do just what they are told. You just tagged 2.4.39 as 2.4.38. Please revert to 2.4.38 and tag - until the tarballs are published to vote

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.28

2019-01-17 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
On 2019-01-17 11:24, Jim Jagielski wrote: Shouldn't this be 2.4.38?? On Jan 17, 2019, at 12:13 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: Hi, all; Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I would like to call a VOTE over the next few

[VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.28

2019-01-17 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
. [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong. The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are: sha1: 87d389fca46620ac165f8d659ba0bc8180532114 *httpd-2.4.28.tar.gz sha256: 216e3ee1dbd8d62f16155dff7a8aac7c6dbc6532954bec6cb8966a46f9819a23 *httpd-2.4.28.tar.gz -- Daniel Ruggeri

[NOTICE] Intent to T 2.4.28

2019-01-15 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
Hi, all; It's been a while since we've rolled a release and we've had some recent movement, so I'd like to propose T of 2.4.38 in the next day or two. I'll plan to proceed Thursday morning (US Central). -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: AH02268: Proxy client certificate callback: downstream server wanted client certificate but none are configured

2019-01-05 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
maybe try moving all of the directives to the server level and see if we may have an unexpected merge problem. You should at least see information about loading the key pair and what the client-side chain looks like from SSLProxyMachineCertificateChainFile on trace8. -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: Time To Propose Your ApacheCon 2019 Project Summit

2018-11-28 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
@, providing backup as I become busy at the start of the semester. -- Daniel Ruggeri On November 27, 2018 8:30:51 AM CST, Rich Bowen wrote: >Save the date: ApacheCon North America will be held in Las Vegas, at >the >Flamingo Hotel, September 9th through 12th, 2019. This is our 20th >

Re: Plan to add sandbox branch

2018-11-27 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
nodes, I have an idea of tuning parameters I might set differently than if the number of backends is in the tens of servers. -- Daniel Ruggeri On November 27, 2018 5:23:25 AM CST, Jim Jagielski wrote: >In the coming week or so, I will be committing my load balance, >load determi

Re: 2.4.38

2018-11-08 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
I like the idea. I even have a reminder in my calendar for Sunday titled "check if release is ready to roll" :-) I can RM again, even. -- Daniel Ruggeri On November 7, 2018 9:15:06 AM CST, Jim Jagielski wrote: >Now that we have a 2.4.37 out, one in which the number of enhancemen

Re: Load balancing and load determination

2018-10-30 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
it could be percentage of memory used. Still yet, other servers may decide based on number of idle GPUs on-system. I think this is roughly the same you are suggesting, Jim J, but I struggle to think of a universal benchmark because backends are so varied. -- Daniel Ruggeri On October 30, 2018 7:53:20

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.37

2018-10-26 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
On 2018-10-23 14:04, Ruediger Pluem wrote: On 10/22/2018 04:08 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: On 2018-10-18 09:36, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: Hi, all; Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I would like to call a VOTE over

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.37

2018-10-22 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
Hi, Cory; Yes, you are correct. This gets cleaned up as part of the final fixups in the release scripts. It's one of the things done at the last moment :-) -- Daniel Ruggeri On 2018-10-22 10:23, Cory McIntire wrote: Just a note, the date here is Sept instead of Oct :) http

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.37

2018-10-22 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
On 2018-10-18 09:36, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: Hi, all; Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate tarball as 2.4.37: [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's

Re: t/modules/http2.t: Run only if OpenSSL >= 1.0.0 is available

2018-10-21 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
revision 1844483) > +++ t/modules/http2.t   (working copy) > @@ -25,6 +25,16 @@ >  my $openssl_version = Net::SSLeay::OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER(); >  if ($openssl_version < 0x1000) { > $tls_modern = 0; > +} else { > +    Apache::TestRequest::scheme("https"); > +    my $url = '/test_ssl_version_lookup'; > +    my $r = GET("$url"); > +    $openssl_version = $r->content; > +    print STDOUT "OpenSSL version '$openssl_version'\n"; > +    # OpenSSL/0.9.8zh, OpenSSL/1.0.2p etc. > +    if ($openssl_version =~ /\/0\./) { > +    $tls_modern = 0; > +    } >  } > >  Apache::TestRequest::module("http2"); > > What do people think? Should I apply it? > > Regards, > > Rainer +1 -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.37

2018-10-18 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
On 2018-10-18 09:36, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: Hi, all; Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ I would like to call a VOTE over the next few days to release this candidate tarball as 2.4.37: [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's

[VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.37

2018-10-18 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
. [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong. The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are: sha1: b0521606d1df54bb425adcdecf6348f126aa352c *httpd-2.4.37.tar.gz sha256: aa97a834a32d51974be8d8a013b561e28d327387cb1da2c3c2762acd0146aabd *httpd-2.4.37.tar.gz -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: [NOTICE] Intent to T 2.4.37 - about 12:00 GMT tomorrow

2018-10-18 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
On 2018-10-18 07:12, Rainer Jung wrote: Am 17.10.2018 um 13:41 schrieb Daniel Ruggeri: Hi, all; With the fix for detected OpenSSL 1.1.1 issues now backported to 2.4.x, I would like to tag the next version of our venerable server soon. I have already successfully completed the test suite

Re: [NOTICE] Intent to T 2.4.37 - about 12:00 GMT tomorrow

2018-10-17 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
On 2018-10-17 13:13, Dennis Clarke wrote: On 10/17/2018 07:41 AM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: Hi, all; With the fix for detected OpenSSL 1.1.1 issues now backported to 2.4.x, I would like to tag the next version of our venerable server soon. I have already successfully completed the test suite

Re: [Discussion] Limit the scope of 2.4.x patches until 2.4.next is released?

2018-10-17 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
RM and we can add to the list of ready volunteers. Indeed, I was encouraging jchampion at ACNA to toss his hat in the ring as an RM... here's to hoping :-) -- Daniel Ruggeri On October 15, 2018 9:10:13 AM CDT, William A Rowe Jr wrote: >Like my beg for getting us to the 2.4.35 release

[NOTICE] Intent to T 2.4.37 - about 12:00 GMT tomorrow

2018-10-17 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
e detected in [1]. Feeling good about this one :-) How about roughly 24 hours from now? [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/48de97bd66ceabcf84a3719b36cd69274cb8c4b64d68c46696beb906@ -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: svn commit: r1844047 - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x: ./ STATUS modules/ssl/ssl_engine_io.c

2018-10-17 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
Thank you so much for your thorough work. One of these days I'd love to hear all about your testing setup. It would so cool to run something similar on our buildbot! -- Daniel Ruggeri On October 17, 2018 3:01:11 AM CDT, Rainer Jung wrote: >Thanks. > >I'm doing new builds now fo

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36

2018-10-15 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
/cff9db75d9e281f116382f090b3079dedc2c9842192d213ae4948e15@%3Cdev.httpd.apache.org%3E -- Daniel Ruggeri On 2018/10/10 19:18:45, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > Hi, all; > Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/httpd/ > > I wou

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36

2018-10-14 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
of this release, I want to be sure the topic gets due attention. -- Daniel Ruggeri On October 14, 2018 4:44:04 PM CDT, "Helmut K. C. Tessarek" wrote: >On 2018-10-10 15:18, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: >> Hi, all; >>    Please find below the proposed release tarball

Re: t/modules/buffer.t failing in 2.4.36, LWP bug [Was: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36]

2018-10-14 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
ork around this in the test suite. If we had an > > external curl or similar available it would work. Or if we would code > > ourselves sending a raw request on the socket and reading the raw request.> > > Depending on timing the test could break even for small POST sizes. Eg. > > on my Solaris system it already breaks around 128KB, but theoretically > > it could happen even much earlier.> > > Regards,> > > Rainer> > This is an issue only with LWP? I thought you also detected browsers and curl failing with the test server as-configured? -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36

2018-10-10 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
)     machine: x86_64   libraries:     openssl: "1.1.1"     openldap: "2.4.46"     apr: "1.6.5"     apr-util: "1.6.1"     iconv: "1.2.2"     brotli: "1.0.6"     nghttp2: "1.34.0"     zlib: "1.2.11"     pcre: "8.42"    

Re: NOTICE: Intent to T 2.4.36

2018-10-10 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
. -- Daniel Ruggeri

[VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.36

2018-10-10 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
. [ ] -1: There's trouble in paradise. Here's what's wrong. The computed digests of the tarball up for vote are: sha1: e40e7a879b84df860215b8a80f2a535534a1c4b4 *httpd-2.4.36.tar.gz sha256: ef788fb7c814acb2506a8b758a1a3f91f368f97bd4e6db16e98001f468e8e288 *httpd-2.4.36.tar.gz -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: NOTICE: Intent to T 2.4.36

2018-10-10 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
On 2018-10-10 07:30, Joe Orton wrote: On Tue, Oct 09, 2018 at 03:29:49PM -0500, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: Hi, all; I ran through my usual testing routine, this time with OpenSSL 1.1.1, but found several test failures. In the past, these issues have been isolated to my environment so I just

Re: NOTICE: Intent to T 2.4.36

2018-10-09 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
11" pcre: "8.42" libxml2: "2.9.8" php: "5.6.38" lua: "5.3.5" curl: "7.61.1" Anything look obviously crazy/wrong? -- Daniel Ruggeri On 2018-10-09 06:36, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: Hi, all; Barring any major disagreement in the next several hours, I intend to T our next version later today or early tomorrow. Hooray for TLS 1.3! -- Daniel Ruggeri

NOTICE: Intent to T 2.4.36

2018-10-09 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
Hi, all; Barring any major disagreement in the next several hours, I intend to T our next version later today or early tomorrow. Hooray for TLS 1.3! -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: Wherefor 2.4.36?

2018-10-06 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
Actually, I'm glad you asked. I committed after 2.4.35 to T 2.4.36 soon after. I'm happy to do that ASAP if there are no objections. What say you, fellow devs? How about next week? -- Daniel Ruggeri On October 6, 2018 7:53:58 PM CDT, Michael-Fever wrote: > >Aww, all I care about is g

Re: Announce missing - in moderation?

2018-09-29 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
-to message since that seems like the easiest approach. -- Daniel Ruggeri On 9/28/2018 9:13 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > Sebb thank you for your analysis! > > Two issues; one, the reply-to field of security announcements was set > to security@, and this is in direct contravention of A

Re: Announce missing - in moderation?

2018-09-25 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
FWIW, this was a straight forward multi-To field email message addressed to both lists. If there is a way I can improve the announce/release automation, I am happy to do so. Maybe a better way is to send multiple messages? -- Daniel Ruggeri On September 25, 2018 7:12:25 PM EDT, William A Rowe

Re: Announce missing - in moderation?

2018-09-25 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
0 2.0.0 Ok: queued as 9B4B1E1B I've also added Craig here as he was unable to find the message sent to announce@a.o - with luck, these won't vanish, but at least this time I have the message IDs... -- Daniel Ruggeri On 2018-09-24 16:59, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: Yes, I sent via curl (true story

Re: Announce missing - in moderation?

2018-09-24 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
for mismatched SPF records. > > > >On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 9:16 AM Daniel Ruggeri >wrote: > >> Hi, all; >>I sent the announce message for 2.4.35, but haven't received it >myself. >> I didn't get errors sending that I am aware of. Perhaps it is in >>

Announce missing - in moderation?

2018-09-24 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
Hi, all; I sent the announce message for 2.4.35, but haven't received it myself. I didn't get errors sending that I am aware of. Perhaps it is in moderation? If not, I can check in with infra to see if mail-relay.a.o ate it. Thanks -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: svn commit: r29575 - /dev/httpd/ /release/httpd/

2018-09-21 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
Ah, yes - good point. We even just talked about that topic at the board meeting this week. I'll nuke those and update the scripts to not generate them any more. -- Daniel Ruggeri On 9/21/2018 11:27 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > You may want to use this opportunity to drop md5 and sha1 has

Re: NOTICE: Intent to T 2.4.35 in the next few hours

2018-09-21 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
. -- Daniel Ruggeri On 9/19/2018 5:54 AM, Joe Orton wrote: > On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 11:19:10AM -0500, William A Rowe Jr wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 2:43 AM Joe Orton wrote: >>> You'll likely see issues testing against OpenSSL 1.1.1 until the TLSv1.3 >>> merge is in

RESULT: Passed - [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.35

2018-09-21 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
will also plan to RM a followup release as promised now that the TLS 1.3 change has been merged... but let's give that a few weeks for other features to make it into 2.4.x :-) -- Daniel Ruggeri On 9/17/2018 7:56 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > Hi, all; >    Please find below the proposed release t

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.35

2018-09-21 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
this if you're so inclined :-) Thanks! -- Daniel Ruggeri On 9/21/2018 5:59 AM, Steffen wrote: > Maybe I overlook it: > > I miss in the change log: > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision=date=1840546 > > Looks it needs special windows test attention. > > Description: &

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.35

2018-09-20 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
.6.1" iconv: "1.2.2" brotli: "1.0.6" nghttp2: "1.33.0" zlib: "1.2.11" pcre: "8.42" libxml2: "2.9.8" php: "5.6.38" lua: "5.3.5" curl: "7.61.1" On 2018-09-17 19:56, Daniel

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.35

2018-09-19 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
Wow - that's actually really cool! Thanks for sharing - would love to see a HOWTO. -- Daniel Ruggeri On 2018-09-19 14:59, Christophe JAILLET wrote: Le 18/09/2018 à 02:56, Daniel Ruggeri a écrit : Hi, all;    Please find below the proposed release tarball and signatures: https

[VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.35

2018-09-17 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
: 31c2c82c9cd34749cbb60d04619d9aa3fb0814ab22246ad588d2426dde90c72c *httpd-2.4.35.tar.gz -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: NOTICE: Intent to T 2.4.35 in the next few hours

2018-09-17 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
On 9/17/2018 2:20 PM, Rainer Jung wrote: > Am 17.09.2018 um 20:59 schrieb Daniel Ruggeri: >> Hi, all; >>     I have been delayed executing the automation because the test >> suite seems to be hanging for me. This appears to be consistently >> during t/ssl/varlookup.t

Re: NOTICE: Intent to T 2.4.35 in the next few hours

2018-09-17 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
reported start at test 35 with err "Failed test 35 in t/ssl/varlookup.t at line 109 fail #35" and continue to 83. If anyone has experience with this area of the test suite, pointers definitely welcome. Otherwise, I'll start poking at it. -- Daniel Ruggeri On 2018-09-17 10:01, Daniel Rug

NOTICE: Intent to T 2.4.35 in the next few hours

2018-09-17 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
by then. -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: 2.4.35 in Sept?

2018-09-13 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
. -- Daniel Ruggeri On 2018-09-13 14:24, William A Rowe Jr wrote: I'm unaware of anything blocking a tag today, if someone wants to proceed. What is gained by waiting a few days to slip in another rushed patch to break yet another release?  I see nothing in STATUS necessary to fix 2.4 regressions

Re: Run httpd's testsuite

2018-09-02 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
the server with all modules (--with-modules=reallyall, if memory serves me correctly), you would see many more tests run. Also, do not be alarmed if the test suite doesn't take a full night to run. That is also normal :-) -- Daniel Ruggeri On September 2, 2018 5:49:46 AM CDT, Danesh Daroui

Re: 2.4.35 in Sept?

2018-08-31 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
Hi, Dennis; We took a look at that a year-ish ago, but couldn't find critical mass to release the produced candidate. Are there things in trunk you are particularly interested in? -- Daniel Ruggeri On August 31, 2018 8:29:04 AM MST, Dennis Clarke wrote: >On 08/31/2018 02:40 AM, L

Re: Time for 2.4.34?

2018-07-05 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
the ASF relays, announcements generated by the scripts may not be delivered. -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: svn commit: r1832580 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: CHANGES modules/metadata/mod_remoteip.c

2018-05-31 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
on the context, I am guessing you've detected the config struct is created and set twice, thus losing potential parameters. If that's the case, I'm confident removing the second occurrence should be fine. -- Daniel Ruggeri On May 31, 2018 7:54:37 AM CDT, Yann Ylavic wrote: >On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 9:24

Re: 2.4.34 release

2018-05-29 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
I'm game for doing a T today and running the vote through Sunday (since I'm out of town starting tomorrow) if we're ready. Fellow devs? -- Daniel Ruggeri On May 29, 2018 10:42:56 AM CDT, "." wrote: >Hey everyone, > > When can we expect a release of 2.4.34? > >We

Re: slotmem + balancer

2018-05-20 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
Thanks, Yann;    This does help explain the rationale and I appreciate you taking the time to walk us through the reasoning. -- Daniel Ruggeri On 5/20/2018 3:59 PM, Yann Ylavic wrote: > On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 7:19 PM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote: >> I am under

Re: A proposal...

2018-04-24 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
irectives in a patch, we break the contract that would state "Any configuration valid in 3.4.x will always be valid in 3.4.x." We can't do that today, but it would be great if we could. Adding directives only in a minor bump provides a clean point at which a known set of directives are valid. -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: A proposal...

2018-04-24 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
expressed. For its faults and virtues, at least the test framework is in a single language. I suspect most of us can figure out what other languages are doing, so maybe it's not a big deal... WDYT? -- Daniel Ruggeri On April 24, 2018 7:50:18 AM CDT, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote: >

Re: A proposal...

2018-04-24 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
On April 24, 2018 6:53:52 AM CDT, Ruediger Pluem <rpl...@apache.org> wrote: > > >On 04/24/2018 01:19 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: >> >> >> On April 24, 2018 1:38:26 AM CDT, "Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group" ><ruediger.pl...@vodafone.com&

Re: Start using RCs (Was: Re: So... when should we do 2.4.34? [WAS: Re: Revisit Versioning? (Was: 2.4.3x regression w/SSL vhost configs)])

2018-04-24 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
On April 23, 2018 11:30:07 AM CDT, William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote: >On Sun, Apr 22, 2018 at 11:34 AM, Daniel Ruggeri <drugg...@primary.net> >wrote: >> >> The more I think about it, the more I *really* like a semver-ish >> app

Re: A proposal...

2018-04-24 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
additional features / improvements on top of >2.4.36. >So 2.4.36 would contain the additional features / improvements we had >in 2.4.35 as well, but they >have been in the "wild" for some time and the issues should have been >identified and fixed as part >of 2.4.36. >Users would

Re: A proposal...

2018-04-23 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
o involves some changes to the Perl test framework or some pretty convincing reasons why it's not required. I completely support creating this as a procedure, provided we tackle the "how do I test stuff" doco challenges, too. -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: Start using RCs (Was: Re: So... when should we do 2.4.34? [WAS: Re: Revisit Versioning? (Was: 2.4.3x regression w/SSL vhost configs)])

2018-04-22 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
what's in the build so don't have to do such gymnastics). In the same vein of thought, if it is disruptive to a config, that signals a minor bump. Patch changes must be forward compatible. -- Daniel Ruggeri On April 22, 2018 12:32:24 PM CDT, Eric Covener <cove...@gmail.com> wrote: >On Su

Re: Start using RCs (Was: Re: So... when should we do 2.4.34? [WAS: Re: Revisit Versioning? (Was: 2.4.3x regression w/SSL vhost configs)])

2018-04-22 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
several branches. (I really am digging this idea :-) I'm glad folks have proposed it...) -- Daniel Ruggeri On 4/20/2018 12:08 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > Let me counter with this... Rather than break the API every m.n > release, what if we roll on to 2.6 with no ABI breakage, or r

Re: Start using RCs (Was: Re: So... when should we do 2.4.34? [WAS: Re: Revisit Versioning? (Was: 2.4.3x regression w/SSL vhost configs)])

2018-04-19 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
/disclosed at the same time). -- Daniel Ruggeri On 4/19/2018 7:17 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > I don't disagree with RC's entirely, or the mechanism you suggest, but > that isn't what I read as proposed. > > Our issue is that every httpd must be distinguished, we won't ship > four tar

Re: So... when should we do 2.4.34? [WAS: Re: Revisit Versioning? (Was: 2.4.3x regression w/SSL vhost configs)]

2018-04-19 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
sooner. -- Daniel Ruggeri On 4/19/2018 8:06 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > One of the great things about working on open source is that > one is NOT burdened by schedules. That releases are done > "when ready" not when some artificial schedule or some > calendar date demands.

Re: So... when should we do 2.4.34? [WAS: Re: Revisit Versioning? (Was: 2.4.3x regression w/SSL vhost configs)]

2018-04-19 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
tpd-2.4 $TAG 'drugg...@primary.net' ./push.sh . $TAG dev #Wait for vote ./push.sh . $TAG dist #Wait for mirrors ./announce.sh $TAG 'drugg...@apache.org' 'Daniel Ruggeri' The only hangup so far is when we merge in security fixes right before announce - if the patch in the private repo doesn't mer

Re: Revisit Versioning? (Was: 2.4.3x regression w/SSL vhost configs)

2018-04-18 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
e URL for latest and greatest: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk/config.layout As we love to say, "patches welcome!" Feel free to just submit your diff here (since dev@ IS the power that be) -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: "Most Popular Web Server?"

2018-04-18 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
which webserver to use. > And finally, when the vast majority of web servers nowadays live > *behind* proxy servers, these type of metric surveys are meaningless. > Of course, I feel that this was nginx and MS' plan all along: they > knew how things were changing and wanted to win the "proxy server > market"... all that should be pretty obvious w/ 20/20 hindsight. -- Daniel Ruggeri

So... when should we do 2.4.34? [WAS: Re: Revisit Versioning? (Was: 2.4.3x regression w/SSL vhost configs)]

2018-04-18 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
py (or maybe just content) with the SSL merging fixes and we should prep to ship 2.4.34 as a fix. Does anyone disagree? -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: 2.4.3x regression w/SSL vhost configs

2018-04-14 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
This is a pretty valid reason to consider 2.5. However, I'm not convinced trunk has fixed the funky things referred to in this thread either. -- Daniel Ruggeri On April 14, 2018 2:16:04 AM CDT, Stefan Eissing <stefan.eiss...@greenbytes.de> wrote: > >> Am 13.04.2018 um 16:00 sc

Re: URL's in error pages

2018-04-12 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
. -- Daniel Ruggeri On April 12, 2018 6:46:35 AM CDT, Eric Covener <cove...@gmail.com> wrote: >Scanners at $dayjob (and reports on security@) frequently report that >built-in error documents suffer from non-xss HTML injection from the >request URL. > >Here are a few options to

Re: ab issues (just on macOS?)

2018-04-09 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
That's interesting. Does your machine bind on both IPv6 and IPv4? I would assume just v4 and you have a localhost as ::1 in your hosts file. Is that the case? -- Daniel Ruggeri On April 9, 2018 4:43:42 PM CDT, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote: >OK... if I change the test to use

Re: ab issues (just on macOS?)

2018-04-09 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
blems (I don't have a way to test this on macOS). I *DID* see some strange behavior on my Linux box in that open3 munged both STDERR and STDOUT into a single stream... which is very unexpected. -- Daniel Ruggeri

RE: svn commit: r1827623 - /httpd/site/trunk/content/index.mdtext

2018-03-26 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
(r1827743). -- Daniel Ruggeri > -Original Message- > From: Eric Covener <cove...@gmail.com> > Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2018 6:41 AM > To: Apache HTTP Server Development List <dev@httpd.apache.org> > Cc: c...@httpd.apache.org > Subject: Re: svn commit: r18276

RE: svn commit: r25871 - /release/httpd/docs/

2018-03-21 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
Is this something I could do as part of the push to the dist release mirrors? I have a script that handles the tarballs and doap updates so far. I'm also working on one that will also gather details and prep announcements if we should push these updates at that time. -- Daniel Ruggeri

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.33

2018-03-21 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
Hi, all; I am pleased to report that the vote to release httpd-2.4.33 has PASSED with 7 binding votes and 2 non-binding votes. I will begin the process of pushing the release out to the mirrors today. Cheers! -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.33

2018-03-21 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
On 2018/03/17 23:43:15, "Daniel Ruggeri" <drugg...@primary.net> wrote: > ... > [ ] +1: It's not just good, it's good enough! > ... > +1 for the following test: system: kernel: name: Linux release: 3.16.0-4-amd64 version: #1 SMP Debian 3.16.39-1 (201

Re: Introduction

2018-03-19 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
related, I believe my name even appears in the changelog... Cheers, Bernard Spil. Well met. Welcome, Bernard. Thanks for stopping in to say hi :-) -- Daniel Ruggeri

[VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.33

2018-03-17 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
: cd34636caf03c9a897ddfc928fc866c965f23d909b9612880563a7ad0d1a7e5b *httpd-2.4.33.tar.gz -- Daniel Ruggeri

[NOTICE] T of 2.4.33 imminent

2018-03-17 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
Hi, all; I will be doing the tag and roll of 2.4.33 very soon (2ish hours). I am on mobile so haven't reviewed STATUS since yesterday during the day - now would be a great time for votes and backports just before bundling it all up :-) -- Daniel Ruggeri

[NOTICE] Intent to T httpd-2.4.33 in the next few days

2018-03-16 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
. -- Daniel Ruggeri

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

2018-03-16 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
the announcement as noted on private@, but I think I'd sooner T 2.4.33 and get ready for that one to go out. Again, I volunteer... assuming y'all haven't come to the opinion that I'm cursed as an RM. -- Daniel Ruggeri

RE: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32

2018-03-15 Thread Daniel Ruggeri
> -Original Message- > From: William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net> > Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2018 4:28 PM > To: httpd <dev@httpd.apache.org> > Subject: Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release httpd-2.4.32 > > On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 4:19 PM, Daniel Rugge

  1   2   3   4   >