I would like to add some functionality to Flood but I want to make sure you
can't already do it. What I would like to do is have one urllist but have
some portions of those URL's based on information from each farmer. An
example would be to use the farmer name as part of a URL request. Is there
On Thu, Nov 15, 2001 at 12:56:41PM -0500, Chris Williams wrote:
I would like to add some functionality to Flood but I want to make sure you
can't already do it. What I would like to do is have one urllist but have
some portions of those URL's based on information from each farmer. An
example
By the way:
I didn't find anywhere in the docs, any documentation about the
internal ordering (i.e. between different filters with the same
AP_FTYPE).
--
Eli Marmor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
CTO, Founder
Netmask (El-Mar) Internet Technologies Ltd.
Graham Leggett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jacek Prucia wrote:
I've recently bumped into some wacky kind of problem with Apache
1.3.x that might require writting a patch. If I have mod_proxy
enabled then all requests (proxy non proxy) are logged to
coresponding CustomLog/TransferLog file
Apache 1.3.22 introduced a rather troubling bug in the listeners.
Since we allow the child to start immediately, without waiting on
the prior child to finish, we have introduced a serious flaw. Both
processes are listening on the same socket, already primed to accept
connections. The
Joshua Slive wrote:
From: Aaron Bannert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
These things can not be passed on the command line. That is a gaping
security hole. suexec is designed in a very restrictive manner
on purpose
with the assumption that anything passed on the command line is
Title: Message
Apache Folk:
A few weeks ago, we
submittedthe attached patches to the apache 1.3.x stream that would
add a general purpose filter callback. Although un-necessary in 2.0, we feel
that adding this to the 1.3 stream would be valuable for all module
developers.
Your kind
What specifically would you like to know. What I posted on the list was sufficient for
Ryan.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Wilt, Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: 'Bill Stoddard' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 4:33 PM
Subject: RE: MPM re-write for
On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 12:27:48AM -0800, MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1)
wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Bannert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
I think Justin is going in the other direction -- your proposed changes
need to be broken down into finer grained
Shouldn't the mirrors be updated with the tarballs by now? =)
-- justin
From: Bill Stoddard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 7:22 AM
Apache 1.3.22 introduced a rather troubling bug in the listeners.
Without introducing a huge burden of interlocking the individual
sockets (a patch not worthy of the 1.3.23-dev tree), we can actually
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
Shouldn't the mirrors be updated with the tarballs by now? =)
-- justin
I would hope so.
I need to actually read the How to release document and find out what
should happen next. Us 2.0 guys certainly don't have a lot of
experience with public releases.
On Thursday 15 November 2001 09:49 am, Greg Ames wrote:
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
Shouldn't the mirrors be updated with the tarballs by now? =)
-- justin
I would hope so.
I need to actually read the How to release document and find out what
should happen next. Us 2.0 guys certainly
I've checked AIX and HPUX. AIX has /dev/zero, so it might have chance of
using PTHREAD_SERIALIZED_ACCEPT as is, but HP-UX 10.x does not. They however
both work using MAP_ANON, except HP-UX calls it MAP_ANONYMOUS.
The ap_config.h actually defines MAP_ANON if MAP_ANONYMOUS is defined ...
but only
On Thu, Nov 15, 2001 at 11:17:50AM -0800, Doug MacEachern wrote:
was working fine yesterday, just synced with cvs and all ssl tests hang
here..
When was the last time you synch'd? I did some style changes yesterday,
but I was pretty careful not to change any functionality, but it's still
On Thursday 15 November 2001 11:17 am, Doug MacEachern wrote:
I'll be changing the lingering_close stuff in a little while. The order that
it gets called is kind of screwed up right now. :-(
Ryan
was working fine yesterday, just synced with cvs and all ssl tests hang
here..
0x401c91de in
On Thursday 15 November 2001 12:05 pm, Doug MacEachern wrote:
On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, Aaron Bannert wrote:
When was the last time you synch'd? I did some style changes yesterday,
but I was pretty careful not to change any functionality, but it's still
possible.
i have those changes in my
From: Bill Stoddard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 11:50 AM
You can demonstrate (interactively) by quering server-status against 1.3.22,
with keepalives on. As you restart, keep refreshing. The two servers will
(alternating randomly) answer the status request, as
On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, Ryan Bloom wrote:
Well, I found the problem. SSL is not a NETWORK filter. It is somewhere
between a CONNECTION and NETWORK filter. I have got a fix, but I am
still testing it.
The reason it is not a NETWORK filter, is that SSL doesn't actually write to
the
Can we find some other way of accomplishing the following? libm
doesn't exist on beos and so this breaks the build, and additionally it
doesn't feel right to simply impose a library like this. maybe logic
could be added to add it to EXTRA_LIBS instead if it's needed? That
would seem to be the
Greg Stein wrote:
[...]
I gave up trying to do full reference counting semantics for
duplicates of apr_mmap_t, because I couldn't find a suitable
pool to own the locks that would be required in a threaded
implementation.
Not sure what you mean here. I don't quite understand how threading comes
Aaron Bannert wrote:
Hmm...This was my main concern. Is there any way we can
make suexec's docroot relative to the ServerRoot (determined
at runtime)?
I have a partially completed patch somewhere that allows
for multiple acceptable docroots to be specified at
configuration/compile time,
On Thu, Nov 15, 2001 at 09:14:43PM -0500, Cliff Woolley wrote:
On Fri, 16 Nov 2001, David Reid wrote:
OK, so there has been one negative comment about my patch to fix this, does
anyone else have an opinion?
I personally think Roy's idea is a bit cleaner... but yours is definitely
As it turns out, the REPORT request method is NOT one to which the
Apache developers have assigned a nifty #define in httpd.h.
What the heck is the REPORT request method?
Roy
From: Eli Marmor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 12:57 AM
I think that two things, could clarify the picture to filter
programmers, if these things were added to the documentation:
1. A map of the current order of built-in filters (including all the
optional filters
25 matches
Mail list logo
