William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Please note that this is -why- 1.3 is in R-T-C mode, unlike 2.0. Please
post patches first for that tree. Sorry if it appeared that Aaron, Cliff
and I didn't follow that protocol, since the review happened off-list
in security@ due to the nature of the patches.
Joshua Slive wrote:
This may be my imagination, but won't this allow any module (or even cgi
script) to set the Server header and override the default one. Do we want
this? (I'm undecided, but it is a significant change from previous
behavior.)
I will change this to detect whether a proxy
Martin Kraemer wrote:
Still, we get chunked encoding where the client never expressed the wish
(or capability) to handle it.
As far as I understand, the decision to chunk (or not) is handled within
buff.c - seems proxy is not signalling buff.c correctly on what the
protocol level is on the
Joshua Slive wrote:
This may be my imagination, but won't this allow any module (or even cgi
script) to set the Server header and override the default one. Do we want
this? (I'm undecided, but it is a significant change from previous
behavior.)
The attached patch fixes this so that the
Martin Kraemer wrote:
(192.168.69.1) (pgtm0035)
client -- Apache-1.3.13 -- Apache-1.3.24
Proxy Proxy *and*
Origin Server
One question: in the above senario, where is the data coming from? Is
there another HTTP/1.1
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
| | | MIN=Minor NOR=Normal EHN=Ehnancement |
^^^
does anyone fancy spelling
Enhancement right?
Why don't you file
On Wed, 20 Mar 2002, jean-frederic clere wrote:
HEAD /toto/ HTTP/1.0
Host: vtxrm2
HTTP/1.1 501 Method Not Implemented
This was actually an unrelated bug... it's fixed now.
--
Cliff Woolley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, 23 Mar 2002, Brian Pane wrote:
apache/etagsNOK 61FAILED tests 1-5, 7-11, 13-14, 16-17, 19,
21-25, 27-34, 36-37, 39-42, 44-52, 54, 56-61
Failed 50/61 tests, 18.03% okay
apache/options..NOK 2FAILED tests
1-2
Failed 2/2 tests, 0.00% okay
Fixed. HEAD was no
Cliff Woolley wrote:
On Sat, 23 Mar 2002, Brian Pane wrote:
apache/etagsNOK 61FAILED tests 1-5, 7-11, 13-14, 16-17, 19,
21-25, 27-34, 36-37, 39-42, 44-52, 54, 56-61
Failed 50/61 tests, 18.03% okay
apache/options..NOK 2FAILED tests
1-2
Failed 2/2 tests, 0.00% okay
Fixed.
On Sun, 24 Mar 2002, Brian Pane wrote:
Okay on the etags tests now, but both of the apache/options tests
fail on a clean checkout+rebuild.
I see the problem. Fix on the way.
--Cliff
--
Cliff Woolley
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thom May [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
|
Sander Temme [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| | | MIN=Minor NOR=Normal EHN=Ehnancement
|
^^^
does anyone fancy spelling
There are two problems I see with make_allow() right now. First, it's
using method_registry; if ap_method_register() has never been called
[probably meaning you aren't running DAV], then make_allow() will segfault
as Brian pointed out. ap_method_registry_init() needs to be called
HTTP GET requests with parameters (? and something after it) don't
work with mod_auth_digest of Apache 2.0 (I'm using CVS snapshot
httpd-2.0_2002032321.tar.gz).
It seems that the cause is PR#7063.
With basic auth, everything works flawlessly, and the only problem is
with digest.
From
Pedro Melo Cunha sent this patch to the modperl list, it probably
belongs here.
He also mentions that gnats won't accept his report.
Here is the original post:
Original Message
Subject: Be carefull with apache 1.3.24
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2002 01:01:24 +
From: Pedro Melo
Quoting Eli Marmor [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
HTTP GET requests with parameters (? and something after it) don't
work with mod_auth_digest of Apache 2.0 (I'm using CVS snapshot
httpd-2.0_2002032321.tar.gz).
Note:
I had the same problem in the 1.3 branch (patched and it worked)
I had sent this
Amaury Jacquot wrote:
Quoting Eli Marmor [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
HTTP GET requests with parameters (? and something after it) don't
work with mod_auth_digest of Apache 2.0 (I'm using CVS snapshot
httpd-2.0_2002032321.tar.gz).
Note:
I had the same problem in the 1.3 branch (patched
19 matches
Mail list logo
