On Fri, 6 Sep 2002 10:34:52 -0700
Aaron Bannert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
I don't see where in the spec it says clients MUST automatically
redirect to the URLs specified in a 302 response. OTOH, I do see where
it says:
If the 302 status code is received in response to a request
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 06:13:20PM +0200, Jacek Prucia wrote:
*real* entry, or leave it as it is, just as a proof of concept. If
nobody has problem with this match first URL, even when it's not first
result scheme, then I'll commit fixed regexp later this day.
Go ahead. No biggie. The thing
Agreed.
I'd like to pop APR 0.9.1 out the door (or see somebody do it), then
replicate the various logic bits over to apr-util and release that.
Once done, then we can detach httpd from the floating APR(UTIL) stuff.
Specifically, since httpd uses the FIND_APR m4 macro, it can find a
[sorry for the crosspost. I'm moving this branch of the conversation
to the dev@apr list]
On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 11:37:35PM -0700, Greg Stein wrote:
The hardest problem is that httpd uses m4 files from APR. That means that
APR *must* be present at srclib/apr/ when somebody runs 'buildconf'.
On Sun, Sep 08, 2002 at 11:21:33PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Um, the point is we don't want people testing the tags until they have
been blessed as an alpha.
Hunh? Of course we want people testing the code. I think the problem that
you're trying to avoid is people testing a tag named
William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Doesn't an option --c-plus-plus make more sense than a platform
specific link foo option? Shouldn't we just extend libtool to deal with
the platform specifics, g++ or whatnot, depending on what's required
to support stl and other specifics?
Andy Cutright [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
hi,
so could you possibly speak those unspeakable hacks you've made to
apache to run c++ modules on hp? we're trying to get a c++ module
linked into 2.0.39. any help would be appreciated. we can take this
particular aspect of the discussion out of
[ 3rd time's the charm for this posting? ]
[ Please CC replies to me. ]
I have been hacking at the Apache Benchmark source code, and I am
starting to think that it needs an overhaul, and some extending.
One of the big things that I would like to see would be to library-ize
it, in order to
Ian Holsman wrote:
APR now has version management.
is it time to stop just tagging the HEAD of the apr/apr-util trees
+1
This would also change way an httpd 2.0 developer develops, yes?
- ben
+1.
Ian Holsman wrote:
APR now has version management.
is it time to stop just tagging the HEAD of the apr/apr-util trees
when we make a release and just use the offically released ones?
ie.. we would bundle apr 0.9.1 with httpd 2.0.41,
and possibly further on, not bundle apr in the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 09:51:20AM -0500, Jess M. Holle wrote:
It would be nicest of all to have builds of each version of the core for
each platform -- and pluggable binaries of all the extra modules for
each version/platform as well.
Eergh.. this
Ben Hyde wrote:
Ian Holsman wrote:
APR now has version management.
is it time to stop just tagging the HEAD of the apr/apr-util trees
+1
This would also change way an httpd 2.0 developer develops, yes?
- ben
yes, it could.
It would encourage non-apr developers of httpd to just
Hi David.
have you looked at Flood ???
I would suggest you take a look at that first, as it is 100 times
better than ab.
http://httpd.apache.org/test/flood/
I know justin aaron did a presentation about this.. they may be kind
enough to mail you a copy/link
Regards
Ian
David N. Welton wrote:
Time for another ping. It's been 2 weeks. Any word?
-- Jon
On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 08:32:16PM -0700, Jon Travis wrote:
Hi all...
Jon Travis here...
Covalent has written a pretty keen HTML parser (called el-kabong)
which we'd like to offer to the ASF for inclusion in APR-util (or
Hi all,
While digging into that mysterious hang of Apache 2 on Tru64,
I found that it seemed to be hanging under apr_poll in alloca()
While I found that the problem seems to go away when not using a
prerelease version of the OS, it did bring something to my attention.
According to
Dave Hill wrote:
Hi all,
While digging into that mysterious hang of Apache 2 on Tru64,
I found that it seemed to be hanging under apr_poll in alloca()
While I found that the problem seems to go away when not using a
prerelease version of the OS, it did bring something to my attention.
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 12:02:02PM -0700, Brian Pane wrote:
Dave Hill wrote:
Hi all,
While digging into that mysterious hang of Apache 2 on Tru64,
I found that it seemed to be hanging under apr_poll in alloca()
While I found that the problem seems to go away when not using a
Ok, since I'm not seeing any activity towards getting this
integrated, I'd like to set a deadline. This would help
me out, since it gives direction as to where the project
can go, as well as the ASF since political discussion shouldn't
weigh down the process. It will just save us all a lot of
Has anybody else noticed a memory leak when requesting pages less
than 8k? If I repeatedly request pages less than 8k I have noticed
that
apr_bucket_alloc() calls allocator_alloc() which seems to continuously
malloc() memory rather than finding it in the free list. The reason
why
is
On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, Brad Nicholes wrote:
Has anybody else noticed a memory leak when requesting pages less
than 8k? If I repeatedly request pages less than 8k I have noticed that
apr_bucket_alloc() calls allocator_alloc() which seems to continuously
malloc() memory rather than finding
I'm not sure I understand what your goal is, here. The discussion seems
to be +1 for including your parser somewhere in some Apache project in the
future, there's just no clear concensus on where. Is there any reason you
can't just release your project under the ASF license and be done with it?
It's possible that if it goes elsewhere that it would be under a
different license. That's of course contingent on the decision
from the ASF.
-- Jon
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 01:50:18PM -0700, Scott Hess wrote:
I'm not sure I understand what your goal is, here. The discussion seems
to be
From: Cliff Woolley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 09 September 2002 22:42
On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, Brad Nicholes wrote:
Has anybody else noticed a memory leak when requesting pages less
than 8k? If I repeatedly request pages less than 8k I have noticed that
apr_bucket_alloc()
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 02:44:23PM -0700, Sander Temme wrote:
All,
The following patch allows MacOSX/Darwin to find the SSL library. With this
patch, the current CVS HEAD of httpd-2.0 compiles with mod_ssl enabled and
passes all ssl tests in the perl-framework (except for ssl/proxy since I
I recently ran into an issue with non-ASCII user names in LDAP-based authentication
-- both via the Apache 1.3.x auth_ldap module from www.rudedog.org and with
the httpd-ldap sub-project for Apache 2.0.x.
This issue is rather nicely documented in:
David Hill wrote:
For Tru64, the compiler defines two things, __alpha and __osf__ , either can
be used, the __osf__ tends to be used more.
So:
#if HAVE_ALLOCA defined(__osf__)
Thanks. I'll commit in a minute.
Brian
Sander Striker wrote:
Hi,
I tagged the tree today as STRIKER_2_0_41_PRE1. I'll do some
testing this weekend myself and will retag for release after
I get some positive feedback on this tag.
Greg, could you bump daedalus to this tag next week to see how
it holds?
Sure. I was swamped
What's the current status? Have we tagged for 2.0.41 yet or no? Will this be
happening today/tonight/early tomorrow morning? (IE, I'm installing
subversion and I'd PREFER to grab 2.0.41 and not head.)
On Saturday 07 September 2002 11:12 am, Sander Striker wrote:
Hi,
I tagged the tree
Sander ( Co)
with .40, we backed out the apr-iconv due to it's not-ready state,
with the attached patch.
I've been intending to get the openssl/iconv/zlib library linkage stubs
done for Win32, but my time's been rather short. I should be able
to attack it late this week or early next
In preparation for the new auth changes that have been discussed
on this list, I have created a tag that marks as near as possible a
point in time before any of the new auth changes were implemented,
called AGB_BEFORE_AAA_CHANGES. I'm sure this will come in handy,
even for you skeptics. :)
30 matches
Mail list logo
