On 23 May 2002, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
> I am by no means an expert here, but wouldn't that have something to do
> with threading issues in the new apache brigade code ?
Just so you know, brigades are intentionally thread-unsafe. You can only
use a brigade or a bucket in *one* thread at a tim
On Mon, 23 Dec 2002, Graham Leggett wrote:
> The script gets as far as running cvs, which does part of what it needs
> to do, and then hangs solid. No errors of any kind are logged in the
> error log. The request eventually times out completely.
We talked about this problem at length at the hacka
I don't recall seeing a vote on this...
Bill
> wrowe 2002/12/23 01:10:15
>
> Modified:modules/ssl Tag: APACHE_2_0_BRANCH ssl_engine_init.c
> ssl_util_ssl.c
> Log:
> All we want is type and name, so ask for type and name.
>
> Revision ChangesPat
> From: Sander Striker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, December 23, 2002 6:16 PM
Ok, any reason these shouldn't go in 2.0.44?
Changes with Apache 2.0.45
*) Reorder the definitions for mod_ldap and mod_auth_ldap within
config.m4 to make sure the parent mod_ldap is defined first.
I am by no means an expert here, but wouldn't that have something to do
with threading issues in the new apache brigade code ?
On Mon, 2002-12-23 at 14:11, Graham Leggett wrote:
> Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> > Is it possible to see the script, or at least a flow of what the script
> > does? Hmmm...
Hello,
It's my first post to the list which I'm reading regularly, so I hope I'll break as few rules as possible.
I'm looking to extend mod_auth_ldap to check if the user is a member of the POSIX group (standard procedure for PAM-LDAP, for
instance). As opposed to regular LDAP groups where membe
> From: Bill Stoddard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, December 23, 2002 4:09 PM
> Sander,
>
> Mind if I complete the port of the 2.1 mod_cache changes back into 2.0? I'd
> like to get them into 2.0.44.
Not at all. Go ahead. I'll be tagging in a few hours. I'm currently
in the proce
By the way, the RC of Open SSL 0.9.7 was released yesterday, and the
final is planned before the end of the month.
It's important to test it with 2.0.44 before both are released, on as
many as possible platforms.
It's called "0.9.7", but it's a major version, after years of
development. Contrary
Sander,
Mind if I complete the port of the 2.1 mod_cache changes back into 2.0? I'd
like to get them into 2.0.44.
Bill
> -Original Message-
> From: Sander Striker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Sunday, December 22, 2002 7:12 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: 2.0.44 release?
>
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Is it possible to see the script, or at least a flow of what the script
does? Hmmm... could it possibly be an envar issue?
#!/bin/sh
WORKDIR=/tmp
JAVA_HOME=/opt/IBMJava2-131/
PATH=$PATH:$JAVA_HOME/bin
export JAVA_HOME PATH
if [ $QUERY_STRING ]; then
DEPLOY_PATH=vendir-$Q
Graham Leggett wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> We have a CGI script that uses cvs to update a source code tree, then
> uses ant to build the tree. This script worked 100% under Apache
> v1.3.27, but it no longer works in v2.0.43 (or the Redhat v8.0 supplied
> v2.0.40)
>
> The script gets as far as run
Andy Cutright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> thanks for the input. the question still remains, is this a regression? is
> this something to be concerned about with other platforms?
There is no magic libtool version that works fine with Apache
everywhere. This may not be comforting to hear, but it
Jeff Trawick wrote:
Lots of code was rewritten. I don't know of any extra settings.
Note that there are some CGI-related issues fixed after 2.0.43, so you
might want to try the current pre-2.0.44 tag.
Aaaargh. Will give it a try.
> If you stick with
2.0.43, use mod_cgi instead of mod_cgid s
Graham Leggett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> We have a CGI script that uses cvs to update a source code tree, then
> uses ant to build the tree. This script worked 100% under Apache
> v1.3.27, but it no longer works in v2.0.43 (or the Redhat v8.0
> supplied v2.0.40)
>
> The script gets as far as
Hi all,
We have a CGI script that uses cvs to update a source code tree, then
uses ant to build the tree. This script worked 100% under Apache
v1.3.27, but it no longer works in v2.0.43 (or the Redhat v8.0 supplied
v2.0.40)
The script gets as far as running cvs, which does part of what it need
15 matches
Mail list logo
