Apache 2.0.45 -alpha tarball candidates for testing

2003-03-31 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
The release tarball (and win32 .zip file) are now available for testing from; http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ Please test this 2.0.45-alpha candidate for general release within the next 24 hours. Once the dev@ list receives enough positive feedback, we will release the files to general

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/build/rpm httpd.init httpd.logrotate httpd.spec.in

2003-03-31 Thread Graham Leggett
Justin Erenkrantz wrote: Keep in mind that RPM isn't necessarily RedHat specific. Other platforms have RPMs available - IBM uses it for AIX, I think. Ok. The release manager elf changes it on bumping. -- justin The following code will pull the version number out of ap_release.h: cat

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/build/rpm httpd.init httpd.logrotatehttpd.spec.in

2003-03-31 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
--On Monday, March 31, 2003 10:09 AM +0200 Graham Leggett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The following code will pull the version number out of ap_release.h: cat include/ap_release.h | grep define AP_SERVER_MAJORVERSION | cut -d' ' -f3 | tr -d '\' Is it portable? FWIW, I'd use: grep ^#define

Re: Apache 2.0.45 -alpha tarball candidates for testing

2003-03-31 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
--On Monday, March 31, 2003 1:56 AM -0600 William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please test this 2.0.45-alpha candidate for general release within the next 24 hours. Once the dev@ list receives enough positive feedback, we will release the files to general availability, moving them to

Re: [PATCH] don't try to clean up listening sockets twice priorto exec

2003-03-31 Thread Jeff Trawick
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: ++1 - makes perfect sense. One more oddball observation. Why repeatedly invoke the cleanups? We need only a few handles in cgid, it seems that setting those few handles aside and invoking cleanup_for_exec ourselves before we enter the server loop in the fork()ed cgid

Re: Apache 2.0.45 -alpha tarball candidates for testing

2003-03-31 Thread Jeff Trawick
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: The release tarball (and win32 .zip file) are now available for testing from; http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ Note that child error functions other than in mod_cgid *are* horked due to log files being closed, but playing with mod_ext_filter and mod_cgi I don't

Re: [patch] two small problems in ssl_engine_mutex.c

2003-03-31 Thread Jim Jagielski
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: One, win32 won't compile (nor any platform missing chown). In this case we didn't need it and have a good macro to look at. +1. We also use chown in a few other places as well: ./modules/generators/mod_cgid.c:if (chown(sconf-sockname,

Re: Apache 2.0.45 -alpha tarball candidates for testing

2003-03-31 Thread Brian Pane
On Mon, 2003-03-31 at 00:38, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: --On Monday, March 31, 2003 1:56 AM -0600 William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please test this 2.0.45-alpha candidate for general release within the next 24 hours. Once the dev@ list receives enough positive feedback, we

mod_deflate -- File size lower bound needed?

2003-03-31 Thread Stephen Pierzchala
All: A question for discussion: should a lower bound be set in mod_deflate? I just ran a test using the Linux Documentation Project files and found that some of the files in the test group were quite small, less that 100 bytes. When mod_deflate tackled these files, I saw a file sized increase of

Re: Apache 2.0.45 -alpha tarball candidates for testing

2003-03-31 Thread Brad Nicholes
So far the testing on NetWare has been good. Everything seems to build and run as expected. We are continuing with our testing to make sure that there are no surprises. Brad Brad Nicholes Senior Software Engineer Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions

Re: mod_deflate -- File size lower bound needed?

2003-03-31 Thread Ian Holsman
Stephen Pierzchala wrote: All: A question for discussion: should a lower bound be set in mod_deflate? I just ran a test using the Linux Documentation Project files and found that some of the files in the test group were quite small, less that 100 bytes. When mod_deflate tackled these files, I

Re: Apache 2.0.45 -alpha tarball candidates for testing

2003-03-31 Thread Jim Jagielski
Works just dandy under Solaris 8, prefork and worker, with SSL enabled. -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order

Re: mod_deflate -- File size lower bound needed?

2003-03-31 Thread TOKILEY
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Stephen Pierzchala wrote: All: A question for discussion: should a lower bound be set in mod_deflate? I just ran a test using the Linux Documentation Project files and found that some of the files in the test group were quite small, less that 100 bytes. When

Re: Apache 2.0.45 -alpha tarball candidates for testing

2003-03-31 Thread Andre Schild
Works fine under NT 4.0 with ssl and mod_jk since ~10 hours so far. André [EMAIL PROTECTED] 31.03.2003 19:31:37 Works just dandy under Solaris 8, prefork and worker, with SSL enabled. -- === Jim Jagielski [|]

Apache not picking up CC from APR?

2003-03-31 Thread Jeff Trawick
HEAD of everything, Solaris, out-of-tree APR and apr-util Apache picks up CFLAGS from APR, but not CC, resulting in a failure if CFLAGS has non-gcc options but gcc is found

anybody using Sun's compiler and getting libthread referenced byexecutables but not libpthread?

2003-03-31 Thread Jeff Trawick
I'm using Sun WorkShop 5.0 sometimes, and these builds result in executables like httpd referencing libthread but not libpthread. We pass cc the -mt switch, but at least with this version that switch isn't enough to pull in libpthread. Can anybody confirm that with a more recent Sun compiler

Re: anybody using Sun's compiler and getting libthread referencedby executables but not libpthread?

2003-03-31 Thread Spinka, Kristofer
The -mt compiler option only instructs the C++ compiler to perform some multithread safe checks and preserve a specific linking order with the Solaris thread library. On Solaris, the POSIX thread library is an abtraction of Sun's native thread support. So any application that wishes to use

Re: Apache 2.0.45 -alpha tarball candidates for testing

2003-03-31 Thread Thom May
* William A. Rowe, Jr. ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : The release tarball (and win32 .zip file) are now available for testing from; http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ Please test this 2.0.45-alpha candidate for general release within the next 24 hours. Once the dev@ list receives enough

Re: anybody using Sun's compiler and getting libthread referencedby executables but not libpthread? (fwd)

2003-03-31 Thread Spinka, Kristofer
1. It's an out of date, and Solaris-biased (as opposed to POISX), man page. Even on Solaris 9. http://docs.sun.com/source/816-2454/cc_ops.app.html#pgfId-25 A.3.42 -mt Macro option that expands to -D_REENTRANT -lthread. If you are doing your own multithread coding, you must use this

Re: anybody using Sun's compiler and getting libthread referencedby executables but not libpthread?

2003-03-31 Thread Pier Fumagalli
On 31/3/03 20:59, Jeff Trawick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm using Sun WorkShop 5.0 sometimes, and these builds result in executables like httpd referencing libthread but not libpthread. We pass cc the -mt switch, but at least with this version that switch isn't enough to pull in libpthread.

RE: Apache 2.0.45 -alpha tarball candidates for testing

2003-03-31 Thread MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1)
Is there any way of telling libtool to NOT use gcc/cc for linking. Instead, use ld ?. libtool 1.4.3 seems to have problems on HP-UX. When I use 1.4, everything seems to work just fine. --Madhu -Original Message- From: Thom May [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 1:00

Re: anybody using Sun's compiler and getting libthread referencedby executables but not libpthread?

2003-03-31 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
--On Monday, March 31, 2003 14:59:17 -0500 Jeff Trawick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm using Sun WorkShop 5.0 sometimes, and these builds result in executables like httpd referencing libthread but not libpthread. We pass cc the -mt switch, but at least with this version that switch isn't enough to

Re: anybody using Sun's compiler and getting libthread referencedby executables but not libpthread? (fwd)

2003-03-31 Thread Spinka, Kristofer
1. Clarification: -D_POSIX_PTHREAD_SEMANTICS -D_REENTRANT should be specified explicitly. During linking, -lpthread should be specified explictly. /kristofer On Mon, 31 Mar 2003, Spinka, Kristofer wrote: 1. It's an out of date, and Solaris-biased (as opposed to POISX), man page. Even on

Re: anybody using Sun's compiler and getting libthread referencedby executables but not libpthread? (fwd)

2003-03-31 Thread Jeff Trawick
Spinka, Kristofer wrote: 1. Clarification: -D_POSIX_PTHREAD_SEMANTICS -D_REENTRANT should be specified explicitly. During linking, -lpthread should be specified explictly. existing code does that via apr_hints.m4 I'm testing some changes to apr_hints.m4 now that will make sure -lpthread is

Re: anybody using Sun's compiler and getting libthread referencedby executables but not libpthread?

2003-03-31 Thread Jeff Trawick
Justin Erenkrantz wrote: --On Monday, March 31, 2003 14:59:17 -0500 Jeff Trawick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm using Sun WorkShop 5.0 sometimes, and these builds result in executables like httpd referencing libthread but not libpthread. We pass cc the -mt switch, but at least with this version

Re: anybody using Sun's compiler and getting libthread referencedby executables but not libpthread? (fwd)

2003-03-31 Thread Spinka, Kristofer
Can we take the -mt flag out of the works? /kristofer On Mon, 31 Mar 2003, Jeff Trawick wrote: Spinka, Kristofer wrote: 1. Clarification: -D_POSIX_PTHREAD_SEMANTICS -D_REENTRANT should be specified explicitly. During linking, -lpthread should be specified explictly. existing code

how do you debug a module from dev studio?

2003-03-31 Thread Jeff D. Hamann
I'm desparately wanting to develop a new module for apache2 (that doesn't lots of computations) and have no idea how you go about debugging a module using devstudio. How do you debug a module using devstudio? Jeff.

Re: anybody using Sun's compiler and getting libthread referencedby executables but not libpthread? (fwd)

2003-03-31 Thread Jeff Trawick
Spinka, Kristofer wrote: Can we take the -mt flag out of the works? that makes sense to me based on the doc

Re: mod_deflate -- File size lower bound needed?

2003-03-31 Thread TOKILEY
FYI: There was a serious brain fart (mine) in the previous message... I said... 2. If there's no EOS in the brigade yet you have to assume more is coming so now it's nut-crackin' time. If the 'minimum file size' is less than the amount of data already in the first brigade showing up then

Re: anybody using Sun's compiler and getting libthread referencedby executables but not libpthread?

2003-03-31 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
--On Monday, March 31, 2003 14:59:17 -0500 Jeff Trawick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm using Sun WorkShop 5.0 sometimes, and these builds result in executables like httpd referencing libthread but not libpthread. We pass cc the -mt switch, but at least with this version that switch isn't enough to

httpd 2.0.45-alpha on Solaris 9 w/Sun C 5.5 EA2 2003/01/09

2003-03-31 Thread Spinka, Kristofer
Builds and runs wonderfully on x86 and SPARC. I have not had the time for extensive testing, but just some simple feedback. Notes: -- I removed -mt from pthreads_cflags. Configure Used: --- CC=cc CFLAGS=-xO5 ./configure --with-mpm=worker --enable-rewrite --enable-so

mixing c c++ on HP-UX

2003-03-31 Thread Andy Cutright
hi all, there was some discussion on this list about HP-UX and c++ modules. we had a mixture like this running with 2.0.43. we've recently upgraded to 2.0.44, and we're now experiencing problems at load time. i'm wondering if anyone is running 2.0.44 on HP-UX with c++ modules successfully,

Re: how do you debug a module from dev studio?

2003-03-31 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 04:14 PM 3/31/2003, Jeff D. Hamann wrote: I'm desparately wanting to develop a new module for apache2 (that doesn't lots of computations) and have no idea how you go about debugging a module using devstudio. How do you debug a module using devstudio? Couple of quick tricks. First, it's easier

Re: httpd 2.0.45-alpha on Solaris 9 w/Sun C 5.5 EA2 2003/01/09

2003-03-31 Thread Jeff Trawick
Spinka, Kristofer wrote: Configure Used: --- CC=cc CFLAGS=-xO5 ./configure --with-mpm=worker --enable-rewrite --enable-so --enable-headers --enable-deflate Compiler Version: - Sun ONE Studio 8 Compilers (Beta) Sun C 5.5 EA2 2003/01/09 Proper libpthread.so Linking: any

Re: mixing c c++ on HP-UX

2003-03-31 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Andy, there were new fixes in 2.0.45 that should address this. See... http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/apr/dso/unix/dso.c Bill At 04:57 PM 3/31/2003, Andy Cutright wrote: hi all, there was some discussion on this list about HP-UX and c++ modules. we had a mixture like this running with

Re: httpd 2.0.45-alpha on Solaris 9 w/Sun C 5.5 EA2 2003/01/09

2003-03-31 Thread Spinka, Kristofer
any idea why you get libpthread linked without hacking anything to refer to libpthread directly, but I don't? Did you remove the -mt from srclib/apr/configure / srclib/apr/apr_threads.m4? /kristofer

Re: httpd 2.0.45-alpha on Solaris 9 w/Sun C 5.5 EA2 2003/01/09

2003-03-31 Thread Jeff Trawick
Spinka, Kristofer wrote: any idea why you get libpthread linked without hacking anything to refer to libpthread directly, but I don't? Did you remove the -mt from srclib/apr/configure / srclib/apr/apr_threads.m4? I'm in the middle of trying that, but I'm far enough along that I can see that it

Re: httpd 2.0.45-alpha on Solaris 9 w/Sun C 5.5 EA2 2003/01/09

2003-03-31 Thread Spinka, Kristofer
Just to confirm, here is a SPARC version of that ldd with -mt removed: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/src/httpd-2.0.45] ldd .libs/httpd libz.so = /usr/local/lib/libz.so libaprutil-0.so.0 = /usr/local/apache2/lib/libaprutil-0.so.0 libexpat.so.0 =

Re: httpd 2.0.45-alpha on Solaris 9 w/Sun C 5.5 EA2 2003/01/09

2003-03-31 Thread Jeff Trawick
Spinka, Kristofer wrote: Builds and runs wonderfully on x86 and SPARC. I have not had the time for extensive testing, but just some simple feedback. Notes: -- I removed -mt from pthreads_cflags. in case you don't watch the commit logs, your change to apr_thread.m4 was just committed...

Re: Apache 2.0.45 -alpha tarball candidates for testing

2003-03-31 Thread Sander Temme
www.apache.org server, but we need a variety of platforms and different configurations to have complete confidence in the release. My Powerbook: Darwin monalisa.sfo.covalent.net 6.4 Darwin Kernel Version 6.4: Wed Jan 29 18:50:42 PST 2003; root:xnu/xnu-344.26.obj~1/RELEASE_PPC Power Macintosh

Re: mixing c c++ on HP-UX

2003-03-31 Thread Andy Cutright
hi bill, thanks for your help. that doesn't seem to be the root cause. we've been loading our modules without BIND_NOSTART for a while now on HP-UX. the program is dumping core in apr_pools.c:1976 with a SIGSEGV. i'm gonna start digging deeper, cheers, andy William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:

Re: Apache 2.0.45 -alpha tarball candidates for testing

2003-03-31 Thread Jeff Trawick
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: The release tarball (and win32 .zip file) are now available for testing from; http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ layouts (and thus the Apache binbuild mechanism) have some problems... can anybody get it to work? FreeBSD 5.0: unpack the alpha then $ cd httpd-2.0.45

Re: Apache 2.0.45 -alpha tarball candidates for testing

2003-03-31 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
--On Monday, March 31, 2003 7:57 PM -0500 Jeff Trawick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: layouts (and thus the Apache binbuild mechanism) have some problems... can anybody get it to work? FreeBSD 5.0: unpack the alpha then $ cd httpd-2.0.45 $ build/binbuild.sh ... APR Version: 0.9.3 ** Error: unable to

rfc: new API to traverse filter chains

2003-03-31 Thread Stas Bekman
in mod_perl 2.0 we register only four filter names (in:out:req:conn) and then we install the actuall perl callbacks using one of these four filter names and storing the actual filter's callback information in f-ctx. If later on we want to do something with an inserted filter we have no API to

Fwd: cvs commit: httpd-dist Announcement2.html Announcement2.txt

2003-03-31 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Announcement to go out tommorow, after the mirrors have caught up. Thanks all, glad to hear the success stories, and hopefully we will have a cleaner binbuild script to work from this coming 2.0.46 release :-) Bill wrowe 2003/03/31 23:40:19 Modified:.Announcement2.html