2.0.4[4-5] Win32 default conf file generation

2003-04-01 Thread Eddy . COLLART
Hi all, There's a slight difference between the default config files for Solaris and Windows, the win install (through the MSI dists) won't go through the process of replacing the @exp_errordir@ tag on install. A source install on Sun did. Not much of a problem, it just involves a 12 seconds edit

Re: Fixed [Fwd: Re: PR 8889: 1.3 apidoc is broken and I don't knowhow to fix :)]

2003-04-01 Thread Erik Abele
André Malo wrote: * Erik Abele wrote: Just pinging another (the 3rd time)... perhaps now somebody can have a look at this. Been there, done that. Works perfect now. Thanks for the reminder ;-) nd Thanks, André! cheers, Erik

apache 2.0.45 and deb build script

2003-04-01 Thread Markus Welsch
hi all, well since apache 2.0.45 a rpm build script has beed added. is there a chance to add a deb build script as well ? greetings, markus

Re: MaxMemFree: kilobytes or megabytes?

2003-04-01 Thread Dmitri Tikhonov
On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 04:38:54PM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote: > Dmitri Tikhonov wrote: > >I'm seeing some weird things happening with MaxMemFree directive > >(http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.0/mod/mpm_common.html#maxmemfree). The > >docs say that this directive specifies the number of kilobytes aft

Re: The announcement has flown...

2003-04-01 Thread André Malo
* William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > At 06:27 PM 4/1/2003, you wrote: >>* William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: >> >>But some issues anyway: >>- Shouldn't the announcement point to httpd.apache.org/download.cgi? > > I though either is now an OK starting point, now that the specific downloads > are always dispat

Re: The announcement has flown...

2003-04-01 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 06:27 PM 4/1/2003, you wrote: >* William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > >But some issues anyway: >- Shouldn't the announcement point to httpd.apache.org/download.cgi? I though either is now an OK starting point, now that the specific downloads are always dispatched to a proxy. If I assumed wrong, sorr

Re: The announcement has flown...

2003-04-01 Thread André Malo
* William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > thanks to everyone who pitched in. Thanks back! But some issues anyway: - Shouldn't the announcement point to httpd.apache.org/download.cgi? - the md5 sums for the win32 binary files are missing. - the version list on Bugzilla needs to be updated nd (Sorry for

The announcement has flown...

2003-04-01 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
thanks to everyone who pitched in. Bill

Re: Fixed [Fwd: Re: PR 8889: 1.3 apidoc is broken and I don't know how to fix :)]

2003-04-01 Thread André Malo
* Erik Abele wrote: > Just pinging another (the 3rd time)... perhaps now somebody can have a > look at this. Been there, done that. Works perfect now. Thanks for the reminder ;-) nd -- sub the($){+shift} sub answer (){ord q [* It is always 42! *] } print the answer # An

Re: MaxMemFree: kilobytes or megabytes?

2003-04-01 Thread Jeff Trawick
Dmitri Tikhonov wrote: I'm seeing some weird things happening with MaxMemFree directive (http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.0/mod/mpm_common.html#maxmemfree). The docs say that this directive specifies the number of kilobytes after which the memory is returned back to the system, but I found evidence

MaxMemFree: kilobytes or megabytes?

2003-04-01 Thread Dmitri Tikhonov
I'm seeing some weird things happening with MaxMemFree directive (http://httpd.apache.org/docs-2.0/mod/mpm_common.html#maxmemfree). The docs say that this directive specifies the number of kilobytes after which the memory is returned back to the system, but I found evidence to the contrary: On st

Fixed [Fwd: Re: PR 8889: 1.3 apidoc is broken and I don't know howto fix :)]

2003-04-01 Thread Erik Abele
Just pinging another (the 3rd time)... perhaps now somebody can have a look at this. It's all fixed and in CVS but I don't have enough karma to fix this by myself :( cheers, Erik HINT: if nobody has the feeling to fix this just because its 1.3, then please give me access to daedalus and I will

Re: prototype for worker graceful *shutdown*

2003-04-01 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
--On Friday, March 28, 2003 3:34 PM -0500 Rodent of Unusual Size <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: the attached patch, based on one bill started, presses SIGINT into service as a 'graceful shutdown' signal. (alternative suggestions highly welcomed.) if the config directive SIGUSR2? SIGINT should defi

RE: Apache 2.0.45 -alpha tarball candidates for testing

2003-04-01 Thread MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1)
The following perl-framework seem to be failing for me. Anybody else with similar problem ?. modules/deflate.1..3 testing default not ok 1 # Failed test 1 in modules/deflate.t at line 36 not ok 2 # Failed test 2 in modules/deflate.t at line 36 fail #2 not ok 3 # Failed test 3 in modules/deflat

Re: Apache 2.0.45 -alpha tarball candidates for testing

2003-04-01 Thread Jeff Trawick
Jeff Trawick wrote: Any chance you can do a build with symbols (CFLAGS=-g or --enable-maintainer-mode) and use a debugger that will display line numbers for the backtrace? oops, probably best to use --enable-maintainer-mode... LDFLAGS w

Re: Apache 2.0.45 -alpha tarball candidates for testing

2003-04-01 Thread Jeff Trawick
Steve Sabljak wrote: The CGI daemon still dies with a SIGSEGV on Solaris 8, worker mpm. Here's a backtrace. 7e100ae8 memset (0, 0, 504f5354202f6368, ffc0, 504f5354202f6340, 0) + 114 7c404784 get_req (9, 10020eaa0, 7810, 7808, ... And here is a m

RE: Apache 2.0.45 -alpha tarball candidates for testing

2003-04-01 Thread Steve Sabljak
The CGI daemon still dies with a SIGSEGV on Solaris 8, worker mpm. Here's a backtrace. 7e100ae8 memset (0, 0, 504f5354202f6368, ffc0, 504f5354202f6340, 0) + 114 7c404784 get_req (9, 10020eaa0, 7810, 7808, 7770, 10020ed61) + 45c fff