+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 02:52:37AM +0200, Sander Striker wrote:
Hi,
I've tagged the 2.1 tree with STRIKER_2_1_0_PRE3. Hopefully this is the
last tag before the first 2.1 release. Please give it a test run.
Tarballs are at:
http://www.apache.org/~striker/httpd-2.1.0-pre3/
It still
- Forwarded message from Colm MacCarthaigh [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
From: Colm MacCarthaigh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2003 16:22:13 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Patch] remove unneccessary IPv6 autoconf-fu
Listen 80 just works now, using v4-only,
[...]
Why don't you just write a fixup handler with libapreq-2?
AFAICT libapreq-2's mod_apreq (filter) handles these details
for you.
I did have the sense that what I was trying to do running under the HTTP_IN filter an
impossible task to achieve. That is until I took a look at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jwoolley2003/09/28 09:27:24
Modified:.configure.in
docs/conf httpd-std.conf.in
Log:
Listen 80 just works now, using v4-only, v6-only, mapped address
or non-mapped address.
so --enable-v4-mapped and one Listen port gets you one
On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 02:09:57PM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jwoolley2003/09/28 09:27:24
Modified:.configure.in
docs/conf httpd-std.conf.in
Log:
Listen 80 just works now, using v4-only, v6-only, mapped address
or
On Sun, 28 Sep 2003, Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
The resends are not a bother. :) Should this change go in both 2.0 and
2.1 or just 2.1? I don't happen to remember whether the change it goes
with was backported or not.
sorry, just 2.1 :)
Okay, that's what I did. So AFAIK all the patches
On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 03:03:30PM -0400, Cliff Woolley wrote:
On Sun, 28 Sep 2003, Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
The resends are not a bother. :) Should this change go in both 2.0 and
2.1 or just 2.1? I don't happen to remember whether the change it goes
with was backported or not.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
Why don't you just write a fixup handler with libapreq-2?
AFAICT libapreq-2's mod_apreq (filter) handles these details
for you.
I did have the sense that what I was trying to do running under the
HTTP_IN filter an impossible task to achieve. That
10 matches
Mail list logo
