Stas Bekman wrote:
David Wheeler wrote:
On Jan 28, 2004, at 2:21 PM, Stas Bekman wrote:
Then for now I'll just use:
my $serverroot = Apache::Test::config()-{vars}{serverroot};
the idea is to get away from that - it's way too verbose to be conventient.
AUTOLOAD is okay with me. It's
In our testing RH3 was horrible -- worse than 2.1. However, a system
with a stock 2.6 kernel with glic2.3.3 with nptl performed comfortable
better than 2.1
YMMV
--
Brian Akins
Senior Systems Engineer
CNN Internet Technologies
Hello dudes,
I want to use back-references in a RewriteRule regex part (think real
regex back-reference, not RewriteCond back-references like %1) but it
doesn't work. I
André Malo wrote:
That has been long time on my todo (hello Stas! :-)
There's a new module I'd like to add to the core distribution. It makes use of
the new httpd version query function (ap_get_server_revision). It introduces
IfVersion containers, where you can depend your config on a
There're two good articles to start learning how to develop an Apache
module:
http://threebit.net/tutorials/apache2_modules/tut1/tutorial1.html
and the continuation
http://threebit.net/tutorials/apache2_modules/tut2/tutorial2.html
You can also find more information here:
The buglet was that prctl() was issued always when available, when goal (to be
consistent with httpd 2.x) was to only issue it if admin has coded
CoreDumpDirectory. The buglet was due to a misunderstanding in the use of
ap_coredump_dir[].
ap_coredump_dir_configured is not considered part of
--On Wednesday, January 28, 2004 1:15 AM +0100 André Malo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I've uploaded the module here: http://cvs.apache.org/~nd/mod_version.c.
The are some more detailed descriptions at the beginning of the file
after the license.
What do you think?
+1 (concept). -- justin
--On Wednesday, January 28, 2004 8:48 PM -0500 Geoffrey Young
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
does anyone have any objections to applying this in 2.1?
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22299
+1. -- justin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Log:
don't use Cookie2 for reading cookie data
Did I miss the discussions on these? ALL development is still
carried out on dev@, even if it's just a review/rehash of
what's in the bug reports.
--
* Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Log:
don't use Cookie2 for reading cookie data
Did I miss the discussions on these? ALL development is still
carried out on dev@, even if it's just a review/rehash of
what's in the bug reports.
Hmm, it was
10 matches
Mail list logo
