Apache-Test module skeletons

hi all... the bug reporting skeleton has become so useful for me (and others) that I have created two new skeletons: http://perl.apache.org/~geoff/Apache-Test-skeleton-mp1.tar.gz http://perl.apache.org/~geoff/Apache-Test-skeleton-mp2.tar.gz these are essentially the same as the bug

Re: Apache-Test module skeletons

Geoffrey Young wrote: hi all... the bug reporting skeleton has become so useful for me (and others) that I have created two new skeletons: http://perl.apache.org/~geoff/Apache-Test-skeleton-mp1.tar.gz http://perl.apache.org/~geoff/Apache-Test-skeleton-mp2.tar.gz these are essentially the same

Re: Some Oprofile results

Bill Stoddard wrote: I submitted a patch to rework ap_rgetline/core_input_filter a year or so ago that provided some performance improvements. If you are inclined, it might be interesting to dig that patch out and see how it profiles. Sure. Repost-it and/or send it to me. -- Brian Akins Senior

Re: Some Oprofile results

Jean-Jacques Clar wrote: Would you please share with us some info on that optimized caching module. I'll say what I can. I'm hoping I can GPL it. Is mod_url_cache a modified copy of the current ones? No. It borrows some ideas from various other modules, including mod_cache and mod_file_cache.

Apache-Test module skeletons

hi all... the bug reporting skeleton has become so useful for me (and others) that I have created two new skeletons: http://perl.apache.org/~geoff/Apache-Test-skeleton-mp1.tar.gz http://perl.apache.org/~geoff/Apache-Test-skeleton-mp2.tar.gz these are essentially the same as the bug

Re: Some Oprofile results

Brian Akins wrote: Jean-Jacques Clar wrote: Would you please share with us some info on that optimized caching module. I'll say what I can. I'm hoping I can GPL it. Is mod_url_cache a modified copy of the current ones? No. It borrows some ideas from various other modules, including mod_cache

Re: libtool (jlibtool)

Joe Orton wrote: On Tue, Jul 06, 2004 at 03:35:30PM +0200, jean-frederic clere wrote: I am using jlibtool and I have found something weird in httpd: In Makefile.in: +++ cp build/*.mk $(DESTDIR)$(installbuilddir); \ sed 's#LIBTOOL = \(.*\)#LIBTOOL = $(SHELL)

[PATCH] mod_charset_lite.c

Hi, When using mod_jk2 and mod_charset_lite mod_charset_lite cores because r-filename is NULL. The easy patch is attached. Cheers Jean-Frederic Index: modules/experimental/mod_charset_lite.c === RCS file:

Re: Some Oprofile results

Bill Stoddard wrote: I'd certainly be interested in knowing how much faster mod_url_cache is as compared to mod_cache/mod_mem_cache. The only way I can see to -dramatically- improve the performance of mod_cache/mod_mem_cache is to completely bypass i/o filters. I have some patches to

Re: [PATCH] mod_charset_lite.c

jean-frederic clere wrote: Hi, When using mod_jk2 and mod_charset_lite mod_charset_lite cores because r-filename is NULL. patch looks reasonable... unfortunately, I lifted some bad style from somewhere (the code around your patch)... I'll fix that up and then commit the appropriate patch

Re: Some Oprofile results

Brian Akins wrote: Bill Stoddard wrote: I'd certainly be interested in knowing how much faster mod_url_cache is as compared to mod_cache/mod_mem_cache. The only way I can see to -dramatically- improve the performance of mod_cache/mod_mem_cache is to completely bypass i/o filters. I have some

[STATUS] (apache-1.3) Wed Jul 7 23:45:05 EDT 2004

APACHE 1.3 STATUS: -*-text-*- Last modified at [$Date: 2004/05/20 15:16:42 $] Release: 1.3.32-dev: In development 1.3.31: Tagged May 7, 2004. Announced May 11, 2004. 1.3.30: Tagged April 9, 2004. Not released. 1.3.29: Tagged October 24,

[STATUS] (httpd-2.0) Wed Jul 7 23:45:11 EDT 2004

APACHE 2.0 STATUS: -*-text-*- Last modified at [$Date: 2004/07/07 22:24:55 $] Release: 2.0.51 : in development 2.0.50 : released June 30, 2004 as GA. 2.0.49 : released March 19, 2004 as GA. 2.0.48 : released October 29, 2003 as GA.

[STATUS] (httpd-2.1) Wed Jul 7 23:45:14 EDT 2004

APACHE 2.1 STATUS: -*-text-*- Last modified at [$Date: 2004/04/27 22:09:17 $] Release [NOTE that only Alpha/Beta releases occur in 2.1 development]: 2.1.0 : in development Please consult the following STATUS files for information on related