hi all...
unless mod_perl 1.99_17 is imminent I'd like to roll Apache-Test 1.14 - now
that Devel::Cover works with mod_perl, 1.14 will be the first Apache-Test
release that has the ability to take advantage of Devel::Cover without
significant user modifications (namely due to the addition of
Geoffrey Young wrote:
hi all...
unless mod_perl 1.99_17 is imminent I'd like to roll Apache-Test 1.14 - now
that Devel::Cover works with mod_perl, 1.14 will be the first Apache-Test
release that has the ability to take advantage of Devel::Cover without
significant user modifications (namely due to
Geoffrey Young wrote:
Stas Bekman wrote:
Geoffrey Young wrote:
hi all...
unless mod_perl 1.99_17 is imminent I'd like to roll Apache-Test 1.14
- now
that Devel::Cover works with mod_perl, 1.14 will be the first Apache-Test
release that has the ability to take advantage of Devel::Cover without
* Joshua Slive [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fair warning:
As the first stage of a simplification of the default config in 2.1
(only!), I'm going to remove all the html files under
httpd-2.1/docs/docroot/ and replace them with an index.html file
containing only htmlbodyh1It
Jeff Trawick wrote:
possible heresy
The first parameter to select() on Windows is actually ignored. We
should zap the logic that does the Unix-style computation of
listenmaxfd and just pass in INVALID_SOCKET or 0, and add a comment
that the value is ignored.
/possible heresy
No heresy, MSDN doc
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ake 2004/10/06 06:33:29
Modified:modules/arch/win32 mod_win32.c
server/mpm/winnt service.c
support/win32 ApacheMonitor.c
Log:
WIN64: fix some windows specific 64bit warnings
-if (!WriteConsole(hConErr, msg, strlen(msg),
On Wed, 06 Oct 2004 15:52:43 +0200, Mladen Turk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ake 2004/10/06 06:33:29
Modified:modules/arch/win32 mod_win32.c
server/mpm/winnt service.c
support/win32 ApacheMonitor.c
Log:
WIN64:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
Please do not do that any more. I'm sorry but I'm vetoing your patches.
Use the official API, it is well documented.
strlen() returns size_t, TextOut() requires int; somewhere a cast is
required, no? what is a better solution?
That's true, but the strlen can never be int
On Wed, 06 Oct 2004 16:15:51 +0200, Mladen Turk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:
Please do not do that any more. I'm sorry but I'm vetoing your patches.
Use the official API, it is well documented.
strlen() returns size_t, TextOut() requires int; somewhere a cast is
Mladen Turk wrote:
That's true, but the strlen can never be int (negative).
The API is DWORD meaning 32 bit unsigned integer, so either
cast to API or no cast.
You are correct that for WriteConsole the cast should
have been DWORD - I will fix that, thanks
For TextOut and lstrcpyn the parameter is
* Joshua Slive [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|__ Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 01:30:23PM -0400:
(only!), I'm going to remove all the html files under
httpd-2.1/docs/docroot/ and replace them with an index.html file
containing only htmlbodyh1It works!/h1/body/html
+1
Good call, Josh.
--
Chip Cuccio
On Wed, 6 Oct 2004, [ISO-8859-15] André Malo wrote:
- there are 1000 people with 1000 other opinions.
For that reason, I'm ++1 for taking this minimalistic variant. Otherwise we
get never a consensus about this darn dummy page.
That's an exceedingly good point. Make it so. :)
+1.
--Cliff
On 06.10.2004, at 18:07, Cliff Woolley wrote:
On Wed, 6 Oct 2004, [ISO-8859-15] André Malo wrote:
- there are 1000 people with 1000 other opinions.
For that reason, I'm ++1 for taking this minimalistic variant.
Otherwise we
get never a consensus about this darn dummy page.
That's an exceedingly
On Tue, 5 Oct 2004, Graham Leggett wrote:
Joshua Slive wrote:
No, because this is a very confusing and ambiguous statement from the
perspective of a random web surfer who stumbles on the page. Their
response is Why are you saying I installed a webserver on my computer?
This must be some kind
Joshua Slive wrote:
My opinion is that the shorter message is better because, by the fact
that it gives no information at all, it is less likely to be
misinterpreted to mean something that the website owner doesn't intend.
I won't object if someone wants to put another piece of text there, as
From what I can see, the reason for providing a short and simple
welcome page is to avoid confusing people by giving them too much
information. The question I would ask is, are you just trading one set
of problems for another? How many people are we going to confuse by not
giving enough
-Original Message-
From: Graham Leggett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2004 8:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bye bye welcome page
Joshua Slive wrote:
My opinion is that the shorter message is better because, by the fact
that it gives no
On Wed, 6 Oct 2004, Sander Striker wrote:
We can always go with simply displaying a meaningless word like 'Waboozle'.
I can see the bugtraq advisory now: Waboozle virus on the loose. ;)
Allan Edwards wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
That's true, but the strlen can never be int (negative).
The API is DWORD meaning 32 bit unsigned integer, so either
cast to API or no cast.
You are correct that for WriteConsole the cast should
have been DWORD - I will fix that, thanks
Look, I'm sorry if
APACHE 1.3 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2004/09/30 17:12:41 $]
Release:
1.3.32-dev: In development. Jim proposes a release top of Sept.
1.3.31: Tagged May 7, 2004. Announced May 11, 2004.
1.3.30: Tagged April 9, 2004. Not
APACHE 2.1 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2004/09/03 02:47:19 $]
Release [NOTE that only Alpha/Beta releases occur in 2.1 development]:
2.1.0 : in development
Please consult the following STATUS files for information
on related
APACHE 2.0 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2004/10/05 00:29:48 $]
Release:
2.0.53 : in development
2.0.52 : released September 28, 2005 as GA.
2.0.51 : released September 15, 2004 as GA.
2.0.50 : released June 30, 2004
22 matches
Mail list logo
