On Sat, Sep 17, 2005 at 04:40:14PM -0700, Garrett Rooney wrote:
+static const command_rec smtpd_queue_smtp_cmds[] = {
+AP_INIT_FLAG(SmtpQueueSmtp, enable_queue_smtp, NULL, RSRC_CONF,
+ Enable queuing to another SMTP server. Default: Off),
+
+
But as far as I can tell, this code is all about SMTP forwarding (not
even relaying per-se). Confuses me anyway :)
I.e. smarthosting. Which might be a better name for the whole thing.
Joost
So I'm playing around with mod_smtpd_queue_smtp, a module that has
mod_smtpd queue messages by forwarding them on to another smtp
server, and I ran into a little snag.
It appears that in older versions of apache2 (2.0.53 in this case)
conn-input_filters-ctx is NULL when smtpd_create_conn_rec gets
Hi All,
I would like to contribute an option to be added to the Virtual host section, so, could someone explain to me what sections of the source code need to be modified, where they need to be modified(to see the new code and access it), and a copy of the source code in un-compiled version soas i
I'm putting together a list of things which we may want to work on for
3.3, one of which is documentation improvements.
Is there any technical reason that the request members are not sorted
alphabetically? The current arrangement makes me a little crazy.
Check the 3.1.4 docs to see what I
Jim Gallacher wrote:
I'm putting together a list of things which we may want to work on for
3.3, one of which is documentation improvements.
Is there any technical reason that the request members are not sorted
alphabetically? The current arrangement makes me a little crazy.
Check the 3.1.4
On 9/18/05, Colm MacCarthaigh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
These seem really unintuitive names; SMTP Queueing usually means
managing a spool and incremental backoff, ie the administration of a
mail queue.
But as far as I can tell, this code is all about SMTP forwarding (not
even relaying
Jorey Bump wrote:
Jim Gallacher wrote:
I'm putting together a list of things which we may want to work on for
3.3, one of which is documentation improvements.
Is there any technical reason that the request members are not sorted
alphabetically? The current arrangement makes me a little
On Sep 17, 2005, at 9:50 PM, Paul Querna wrote:
Sorry for bring this up so late
[ snip ]
Why are these APR Optional Functions?
Why can't they be AP_DECLARE_HOOK's?
-Paul
I decided that they should be optional because after talking to some
people I was under the impression that
On Sep 17, 2005, at 8:35 PM, Garrett Rooney wrote:
On 9/17/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+static int cleanup_socket;
This global worries me. How will it behave in a multithreaded MPM?
-garrett
Right, I'll fix that up.
-rian
On Sep 17, 2005, at 1:27 PM, Garrett Rooney wrote:
So I'm playing around with mod_smtpd_queue_smtp, a module that has
mod_smtpd queue messages by forwarding them on to another smtp
server, and I ran into a little snag.
It appears that in older versions of apache2 (2.0.53 in this case)
Rian Hunter wrote:
On Sep 17, 2005, at 9:50 PM, Paul Querna wrote:
Sorry for bring this up so late
[ snip ]
Why are these APR Optional Functions?
Why can't they be AP_DECLARE_HOOK's?
-Paul
I decided that they should be optional because after talking to some
people I was under
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
I've updated the XML for the mod_python download page and regened the HTML
and it looks like the opration was a success, so 3.2.2b is officially
downloadable.
This was the original announcement that was sent out for 3.1.2 beta. I'm
kind of drawing a blank on 'feature highlight' bullet
Something to watch for the next release - the docs in the 3.2.2b tarball
have version 3.2.0b.
Grisha
Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote:
I've updated the XML for the mod_python download page and regened the
HTML and it looks like the opration was a success, so 3.2.2b is
officially downloadable.
This was the original announcement that was sent out for 3.1.2 beta.
I'm kind of drawing a
I would like to tag and start a 2.1.8-beta cycle next weekend.
According to our VERSIONING file, we should remove all modules
underneath modules/experimental/ for the 2.2.0 release. This currently
includes mod_case_filter, mod_charset_lite, mod_example, mod_dbd, and
mod_filter. This means
Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote:
Something to watch for the next release - the docs in the 3.2.2b tarball
have version 3.2.0b.
Grisha
That's related to the same mistake Nicolas pointed out regarding the
version. When I was creating the 3.2.2b tarball, I updated the
MAJOR/MINOR/PATCH
Hi Grisha,
You could nearly copy/paste this :
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=11060styleName=TextprojectId=10640Create=Create
There is also an HTML version.
Regards,
Nicolas
2005/9/18, Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I've updated the XML for the
Nicolas Lehuen wrote:
Hi Grisha,
You could nearly copy/paste this :
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=11060styleName=TextprojectId=10640Create=Create
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=11060styleName=TextprojectId=10640Create=Create
I
Paul Querna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I would like to tag and start a 2.1.8-beta cycle next weekend.
According to our VERSIONING file, we should remove all modules underneath
modules/experimental/ for the 2.2.0 release. This currently includes
On Sunday 18 September 2005 22:24, Paul Querna wrote:
I would like to tag and start a 2.1.8-beta cycle next weekend.
According to our VERSIONING file, we should remove all modules
underneath modules/experimental/ for the 2.2.0 release. This currently
includes mod_case_filter,
We could simply change the issue's summary so that it reads correctly in th release notes.
Regards,
Nicolas2005/9/19, Jim Gallacher [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Nicolas Lehuen wrote: Hi Grisha, You could nearly copy/paste this :
I noticed that mod_smtpd is hardcoding /tmp as the location to write
temporary files that hold message contents while they're being
processed. It seems like this directory should be configurable, but
even if we want to make it use the system's temp dir, hardcoding /tmp
is not portable.
Attached
The set_id_string function in smtp_core.c currently triggers a warning
by assigning a const char * to smtpd_svr_config_rec::sId, which is
non-const.
I can't imagine we really want people messing with the contents of the
id string, so the best fix seems to be just making sId a const char *.
A
Not sure if this is of value, but I installed 3.2.2b on Gentoo (fully up
to date) by creating an ebuild in my overlay and everything is working
perfectly with my codebase. I am unable to run the test.py as No
module named testconf - Undoubtedly fallout from my installation method.
Regards,
27 matches
Mail list logo
