Roy T. Fielding wrote:
On Jan 2, 2006, at 2:14 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
Now, if you want to tell me that those changes produced a net
performance benefit on prefork (and thus are applicable to other MPMs),
then I am all ears. I am easily convinced by comparative performance
figures when
On Jan 2, 2006, at 3:41 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
+static apr_status_t process_request_line(request_rec *r, char *line,
+ int skip_first)
+{
+if (!skip_first (r-the_request == NULL)) {
+/* This is the first line of the request */
+
Title: RE: RLimitCPU is not working
Does RLimitCPU limit CPU usage by putting a
Setrlimit on the subsequent child processes ??
I cannot find the limits in utask.uu_rlmit[0] in proc. structure of the repective httpd processes.
How is the time limited then ?
I am keen to know how
On 01/03/2006 03:52 AM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 10:18:19PM +0100, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
[..cut..]
2. Proposal
If a subrequest has a broken backend do not sent the error bucket. Only
set r-no_cache to ensure that this subrequest response does not get
cached.
I
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 03:16:18PM +0530, R, Rajesh (STSD) wrote:
Does RLimitCPU limit CPU usage by putting a
Setrlimit on the subsequent child processes ??
When it works, yes.
I cannot find the limits in utask.uu_rlmit[0] in proc. structure of the
repective httpd processes.
How is the
I was using mod_cgid.
Later I disabled it and couldn't execute cgi program without it.
In the directory /cgi-bin I gave options ExecCGI but I get the code being
displayed
every time I try to run the program from browser.
Is there a way to run cgi without mod_cgid ??? Or does RLimitCPU work
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 04:27:01PM +0530, R, Rajesh (STSD) wrote:
I was using mod_cgid.
Later I disabled it and couldn't execute cgi program without it.
The setrlimit calls have been commented out for mod_cgid for a long long
time, so they don't take effect. A simple workaround is to use the
Point taken.Thanks.
Is there any specific reason why setrlimit is disabled for mod_cgid ??
Rajesh R
--
This space intentionally left non-blank.
-Original Message-
From: Colm MacCarthaigh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 4:35 PM
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 05:00:03PM +0530, R, Rajesh (STSD) wrote:
Point taken.Thanks.
Is there any specific reason why setrlimit is disabled for mod_cgid ??
Not that I know of, no. But they've been commented out from the very
start, the very first incarnation of mod_cgid was done that way.
Garrett Rooney wrote:
On 1/2/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jim
Date: Mon Jan 2 08:52:58 2006
New Revision: 365376
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=3D365376view=3Drev
Log:
Avoid magic numbers. Since we are reading the header, let's
be explicit
Sander Striker wrote:
Ok, let me tell you why I want it. I want to implement a directive
called CacheErrorServeStale, which, when it hits the CACHE_SAVE filter
say with a 503 Service Temporarily Unavailable, and has a
cache-stale_handle,
continues as if it would have received a 304 Not
Nothing is output by running ./apachectl start. The access_log and
error_log files are created, but do not contain anything. Running
./httpd output the following:
bash-2.05b$ ./httpd
httpd: Could not reliably determine the server's fully qualified domain
name, using 132.253.10.58 for
Nick Kew wrote:
How about modularised dependencies as a goal for 2.4?
I agree with the idea, but I don't really think theres that manu
libraries linked in...
I've got a 2.0.55 with mp2, php4, ssl, ruby, python, mod_log_sql
using a slew of config IfDevines, each server runs only what it needs.
Nick Kew wrote:
Amongst modules, we should apply the same principle: e.g.
with mod_deflate and zlib.
Or why not just have mod_deflate link against zlib and not have httpd do
it. SSL seems to be the worst culprit. httpd gets linked against tons
of stuff so that I cannot copy the binary to a
On 1/3/06, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Garrett Rooney wrote:
On 1/2/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jim
Date: Mon Jan 2 08:52:58 2006
New Revision: 365376
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=3D365376view=3Drev
Log:
Avoid magic
Garrett Rooney wrote:
The problem isn't just the number of bytes we read off the wire, it's
also that if the compiler has introduced padding between elements of
the struct when you recv directly into the struct the data is not
aligned with the proper members, so when you later access it you
On 1/3/06, Brian Pane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, setting r-status to HTTP_OK is done here solely to make it work
with the existing logic about HTTP_REQUEST_TIME_OUT meaning still
reading the request header.
+1 for of removing the HTTP_REQUEST_TIME_OUT hack. I was trying
to be
On 1/3/06, Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2. Proposal
If a subrequest has a broken backend do not sent the error bucket. Only
set r-no_cache to ensure that this subrequest response does not get
cached.
I think we still need to ensure that an error bucket is sent too, right?
On Jan 2, 2006, at 4:18 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
1. Proposal
If a subrequest has a broken backend also set r-no_cache for the
main request
and ensure that the chunk filter does not sent the last chunk
marker in this case.
2. Proposal
If a subrequest has a broken backend do not sent the
On Jan 3, 2006, at 12:02 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
On Jan 2, 2006, at 2:14 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
Now, if you want to tell me that those changes produced a net
performance benefit on prefork (and thus are applicable to other
MPMs),
then I am all ears. I am
Brian Akins wrote:
Sander Striker wrote:
Ok, let me tell you why I want it. I want to implement a directive
called CacheErrorServeStale, which, when it hits the CACHE_SAVE filter
say with a 503 Service Temporarily Unavailable, and has a
cache-stale_handle,
continues as if it would have
--On January 3, 2006 10:18:06 AM -0500 Brian Akins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Nick Kew wrote:
Amongst modules, we should apply the same principle: e.g.
with mod_deflate and zlib.
Or why not just have mod_deflate link against zlib and not have httpd do
it. SSL seems to be the worst culprit.
On Tuesday 03 January 2006 15:18, Brian Akins wrote:
Nick Kew wrote:
Amongst modules, we should apply the same principle: e.g.
with mod_deflate and zlib.
Or why not just have mod_deflate link against zlib and not have httpd do
it.
It does that now - if built from ./configure. That gets
On Tuesday 03 January 2006 15:13, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Nick Kew wrote:
How about modularised dependencies as a goal for 2.4?
I agree with the idea, but I don't really think theres that manu
libraries linked in...
I've got a 2.0.55 with mp2, php4, ssl, ruby, python, mod_log_sql
using
--On January 3, 2006 11:09:34 PM + Nick Kew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That is of course resolved by LoadFile /lib/libz.so, which is what I
contend should be standard practice. So when another module
relies on libz, there's no side effect that manifests mysteriously
according to whether and
Brian Akins wrote:
Nick Kew wrote:
Amongst modules, we should apply the same principle: e.g.
with mod_deflate and zlib.
Or why not just have mod_deflate link against zlib and not have httpd do
it. SSL seems to be the worst culprit. httpd gets linked against tons
of stuff so that I cannot
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
Alternatively, rewrite the server to remove all MPMs other than
event and then show that the new server is better than our existing
server, and we can adopt that for 3.0.
Well that's a bit silly, leave the others for those who must have an entirely
non-threaded server
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
Nice idea, but libtool doesn't support any of this in a portable manner
- some OSes support DSOs having their own dependencies, a number just
don't.
Name a few? Or one?
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 12:12:18AM -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
Nice idea, but libtool doesn't support any of this in a portable manner
- some OSes support DSOs having their own dependencies, a number just
don't.
Name a few? Or one?
In my experience,
29 matches
Mail list logo
