Re: proxy failover/load balance

2006-02-04 Thread Robby Pedrica
Ruediger Pluem wrote: Finally I found some time to continue my work on this problem. As of now I only committed the change that prevents mod_proxy_balancer from overwriting the status of workers when creating a new child process (http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=374929&view=rev). As announced

Re: APR cross-platform signal semantics

2006-02-04 Thread Garrett Rooney
On 2/4/06, Nick Kew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Historically, different platforms have different signal semantics. > > I need to set up a signal handler. The primary targets are > Linux and Solaris, but I'd much prefer cross-platform. And I'd > like it to be MPM-agnostic in httpd, though the pri

Re: proxy failover/load balance

2006-02-04 Thread Ruediger Pluem
On 02/01/2006 03:34 PM, Plüm wrote: >> >>>changes to the trunk tonight, so that it works at least in the >>>cumbersome way :-). >>> > > > I will cut the breaks from the patch to keep the current syntax alive. > The correct syntax should be defined and discussed later. > And of course documente

Re: Change to test_Session_Session_conf() of test/test.py.

2006-02-04 Thread Graham Dumpleton
I'll at least add a JIRA issue then for something to be done about this for 3.3 and reference this email thread. I'll probably have a couple of others to add related to tests anyway, as I reckon I can change tests slightly so that they will work on a virtual hosting system such as OpenVPS. On

Re: JIRA messed up?

2006-02-04 Thread Jim Gallacher
Never mind. There is already a JIRA issue for this JIRA issue. :) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-697 Jim Jim Gallacher wrote: Howdy, Anybody else finding that the JIRA page layouts are completely messed up? It might be a coincidence but it seems like it might happen after addin

JIRA messed up?

2006-02-04 Thread Jim Gallacher
Howdy, Anybody else finding that the JIRA page layouts are completely messed up? It might be a coincidence but it seems like it might happen after adding a comment. I first noticed it a couple of days ago. Perhaps somebody else can take a look and see if you have any problems? I'm using Fire

[jira] Commented: (MODPYTHON-78) No support for Apache 2.2 yet

2006-02-04 Thread Jim Gallacher (JIRA)
n > Fix For: 3.3 > Attachments: jg-20060204-1.diff.zip > > See http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.mod-python.devel/1425 for some > remarks by Jorey Bump, raised during the 3.2.1-BETA tests. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent

[jira] Updated: (MODPYTHON-78) No support for Apache 2.2 yet

2006-02-04 Thread Jim Gallacher (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MODPYTHON-78?page=all ] Jim Gallacher updated MODPYTHON-78: --- Attachment: jg-20060204-1.diff.zip Patch jg-20060204-1.diff should allow mod_python to work with apache 2.2. This was generated against svn r374719

APR cross-platform signal semantics

2006-02-04 Thread Nick Kew
Historically, different platforms have different signal semantics. I need to set up a signal handler. The primary targets are Linux and Solaris, but I'd much prefer cross-platform. And I'd like it to be MPM-agnostic in httpd, though the prime target is Worker. Is the following correct and compl

Re: Accessing POST request body from a module

2006-02-04 Thread Michael VERGOZ
Hi Phil, At the request_handler time you may create the brigade with something like this : brigade = apr_brigade_create(r->pool, r->connection->bucket_alloc); - Original Message - From: "Phil Endecott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Friday, February 03, 2006 9:26 PM Subject: Re: Ac