William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
You want to commit or should I?
Knock yourself out :)
Cheers,
Mladen.
Mladen Turk wrote:
> William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>> Can't we do
>>
>> +else if (osvi.dwMajorVersion >= 6) {
>> +*dwVersion = OS_VERSION_VISTA;
>>
>> for now (or simply 'else') so that this isn't instantly broken by the
>> next version, irrespective of any changes required?
>>
>
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Can't we do
+else if (osvi.dwMajorVersion >= 6) {
+*dwVersion = OS_VERSION_VISTA;
for now (or simply 'else') so that this isn't instantly broken by the
next version, irrespective of any changes required?
Nevertheless, completely unrelated ...
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Can't we do
+else if (osvi.dwMajorVersion >= 6) {
+*dwVersion = OS_VERSION_VISTA;
for now (or simply 'else') so that this isn't instantly broken by the
next version, irrespective of any changes required?
Sure we can. Since we are only intereste
Can't we do
+else if (osvi.dwMajorVersion >= 6) {
+*dwVersion = OS_VERSION_VISTA;
for now (or simply 'else') so that this isn't instantly broken by the
next version, irrespective of any changes required?
Bill
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Author: mturk
> Date: Tue May 8 10:44:
Nick Kew wrote:
>
> Any chance you could outline an example to explain how my patch
> would break something?
Wouldn't any $ metatoken in the substitution pattern cause chaos,
if the author of the replacement pattern didn't know that ProxyPass
was going to snarf those as envvar patterns?
Mladen Turk wrote:
> William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>> I'll look as soon as my Longhorn beta is up and running, I'm betting
>> that this is all related to the permissions and 'no documents in the
>> application tree' ruleset.
>
> Right, once when I added 'Full Control' to the 'Program Files'
> for Us
On Mon, 2007-05-07 at 21:05 +0200, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>
> On 05/07/2007 05:56 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
>
> >
> > I think we could use a simple two use case situation.
> > To be able to backport that to the 2.2 branch I propose
> > a following patch.
> >
> > It adds additional struct member sti
On Tue, 2007-05-08 at 10:54 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Author: jfclere
> Date: Tue May 8 03:54:35 2007
> New Revision: 536158
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=536158
> Log:
> Add the improvement proposed by rpluem to my backporting proposal.
>
> Modified:
> httpd/htt
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Georg von Zezschwitz
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 8. Mai 2007 10:05
> An: dev@httpd.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: Bug 41897 / Session-Stickiness with mod_proxy_balancer
>
> You declare a balancer:
>
>
> BalancerMember ajp://192.168.1.1:5001 route=member1
>
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
-for (i = 0; i < arr->nelts; i++) {
-const char *err = set_balancer_param(conf, cmd->pool, balancer,
elts[i].key,
- elts[i].val);
+else {
+if (params->nelts > 0 &&
+ (ba
Hello,
>I think Mario's post below is quite clear. I am wondering, however,
>*where* he sees the error message he cites. A log? A popup command
>window? An ok box?
I see a popup window. If needed I'll take a screenshot in the evening.
>Is there additional details (a window caption or
>othe
12 matches
Mail list logo
