Hi,
I want to get the URL list available in the response content from a proxy
web-server (where mod_proxy alone is enabled). I tried with apache output
filter option, which works fine for me. But I want to do it with out using
output filter option.
Thanks,
Mani
I have a module that is serving out images in various formats
and resolution. Our canonical format is:
/operation/image/resolution
for example, to get a jpeg thumbnail of foo.tif 256 pixels:
http://myserver/thumb/foo.tif/256-wide-jpg
This is all working well now and fits in with how other
Google Content-Disposition. This is techincally a
MAIL header, not an HTTP header, I think, but the
major browsers seem to pay some attention to it,
at least some times.
--
Ray B. Morris
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Strongbox - The next generation in site security:
http://www.bettercgi.com/strongbox/
On Aug 13, 2007, at 3:59 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Sander Temme wrote:
On Aug 13, 2007, at 11:37 AM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
It is mostly the same people, regardless. Bill could tag 0.9.15
and start a release vote on APR while Jim rebuilds 2.0.x based
on that
See libxml.
--
Ray B. Morris
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Strongbox - The next generation in site security:
http://www.bettercgi.com/strongbox/
On 08/17/2007 04:03:24 AM, prasana wrote:
Hi,
Is there any API functions to extract url from an response page. I
need to log all the url in the response
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Once Bill tags APR, I'll do more pre-tag regressions,
re-roll 2.x and then look at releasing next week.
+1 I'll be looking out for the tarball.
I did have a configure failure on netbsd 3.1 where it failed a sed
script looking for APR... this was a regression from 2.2.4.
On 8/17/07, Eric Covener [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/17/07, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does this change really require a CHANGES entry??
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: covener
Date: Fri Aug 17 10:33:11 2007
New Revision: 567091
URL:
Does this change really require a CHANGES entry??
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: covener
Date: Fri Aug 17 10:33:11 2007
New Revision: 567091
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=567091
Log:
AFAICT, LDAP_CACHE_LOCK was a no-op when virtualhosts were used
Modified:
On Aug 17, 2007, at 1:46 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
On 8/17/07, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does this change really require a CHANGES entry??
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: covener
Date: Fri Aug 17 10:33:11 2007
New Revision: 567091
URL:
On 8/17/07, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does this change really require a CHANGES entry??
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: covener
Date: Fri Aug 17 10:33:11 2007
New Revision: 567091
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=567091
Log:
AFAICT, LDAP_CACHE_LOCK was
On 8/17/07, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 17, 2007, at 1:46 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
On 8/17/07, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does this change really require a CHANGES entry??
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: covener
Date: Fri Aug 17 10:33:11 2007
New
On Aug 17, 2007, at 2:12 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On 8/17/07, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 17, 2007, at 1:46 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
On 8/17/07, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does this change really require a CHANGES entry??
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author:
12 matches
Mail list logo
