Dr Stephen Henson wrote:
Yann wrote:
Hi,
The joined patch allows the use of client certificate extensions values
(by long/short name or OID) in
the mod_ssl/SSLRequire directive.
This functionnality is available in the 2.2.x and trunk branches but
hasn't been backported
in the 2.0.61, while
Michael Clark wrote:
Hi Folks,
I posted a note about my privilege separation patches the other day
and received some good private help/feedback, and have now made the
patches a considerable amount more portable and they are using apr
much more extensively.
The patch is now fully modular and
Yann wrote:
The changes regarding X509V3_EXT_print() seems more problematic since
the extensions values are used in string
comparison (strcmp and likes), hence the human readable version, and
the code is actually shared with the other
expressions of the SSLRequire directive.
Well the
I'm not good at English. If you can't catch what I say, please see the attached
patch.
This doesn't have to meet 0.9.1, but may affect performance.
modules/ftp/ftp_message.c line 53:
strncpy(outptr, time_str, outlen);
if (outlen APR_CTIME_LEN - 1) {
That's what I've got diff -urN, plain text. I'll be sending this on in
a few hours.
Guy
On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 21:06 -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Guy Ferraiolo wrote:
I'm ready to do this tomorrow and I have asked this question before but
so long ago I dont' recall. I have a patch
On 2007.12.19 at 10:10:54 +0100, Yann wrote:
The changes regarding X509V3_EXT_print() seems more problematic since the
extensions values are used in string
comparison (strcmp and likes), hence the human readable version, and the
I hope that saying human readable you mean utf-8?
I'd say that
Victor Wagner wrote:
On 2007.12.19 at 10:10:54 +0100, Yann wrote:
The changes regarding X509V3_EXT_print() seems more problematic since the
extensions values are used in string
comparison (strcmp and likes), hence the human readable version, and the
I hope that saying human readable you
Folks
Attached is a patch that implements a random substitution feature for
flood. You need a requesttemplate, one or more substitution variables
of the form ${varname) in the requesttemplate and a substitution file
formatted with one value per newline delimited line. There may be more
than one
Hi,
On Dec 14, 2007, at 12:52 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Anyone opposed to us shooting for a TR early next week?
If we can get a couple of security-related-but-not-really patches
committed to 2.0 I'd like to see that as well. I'm offering,
Sure... that would be
Guenter Knauf wrote:
Hi,
On Dec 14, 2007, at 12:52 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Anyone opposed to us shooting for a TR early next week?
If we can get a couple of security-related-but-not-really patches
committed to 2.0 I'd like to see that as well. I'm offering,
Takashi Sato wrote:
apr_cpystrn is better.
Agreed. FYI - it's easier to follow if you change the subject
and prefix that subject with [PATCH] when you offer these up :)
Committed and thanks!
Bill
Paul Querna wrote:
Michael Clark wrote:
Hi Folks,
I posted a note about my privilege separation patches the other day
and received some good private help/feedback, and have now made the
patches a considerable amount more portable and they are using apr
much more extensively.
The patch is now
APACHE 2.0 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2007-12-18 22:52:08 -0500 (Tue, 18 Dec 2007) $]
The current version of this file can be found at:
* http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS
Documentation status is
APACHE 2.3 STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2007-12-03 15:06:37 -0500 (Mon, 03 Dec 2007) $]
The current version of this file can be found at:
* http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk/STATUS
Documentation status is maintained
14 matches
Mail list logo
