On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 14:31:37 -0800
Mark Harrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Suppose I have a request with an Etag: that matches the
current file.
On a GET, then of course that should return a 304 Not Modified.
On a HEAD, should it return a 304, or a 200 OK?
If GET returns 304, then so does
Hi,
any chance we can get this simple patch in to correct a type mismatch
which bothers me all the time when compiling with OpenSSL 0.9.8 on
NetWare?
http://people.apache.org/~fuankg/diffs/ssl_scache_shmht.c.diff
--- ssl_scache_shmht.c.orig Wed Jul 12 09:40:56 2006
+++ ssl_scache_shmht.c
On 2007.12.19 at 11:40:32 -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Victor Wagner wrote:
On 2007.12.19 at 10:10:54 +0100, Yann wrote:
The changes regarding X509V3_EXT_print() seems more problematic since the
extensions values are used in string
comparison (strcmp and likes), hence the human
Victor Wagner wrote:
On 2007.12.19 at 11:40:32 -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Victor Wagner wrote:
On 2007.12.19 at 10:10:54 +0100, Yann wrote:
The changes regarding X509V3_EXT_print() seems more problematic since the
extensions values are used in string
comparison (strcmp and
On 2007.12.20 at 13:53:12 +, Dr Stephen Henson wrote:
Yes I noticed mod_ssl uses the obsolete X509_NAME_oneline() function all
over the place.
Problem is that it was written long time ago, when no better way exist.
Someone have to go over the code and change it to more modern API.
And
Victor Wagner wrote:
On 2007.12.20 at 13:53:12 +, Dr Stephen Henson wrote:
Yes I noticed mod_ssl uses the obsolete X509_NAME_oneline() function all
over the place.
Problem is that it was written long time ago, when no better way exist.
Someone have to go over the code and change it to
On 12/19/2007 04:02 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: wrowe
Date: Tue Dec 18 19:02:57 2007
New Revision: 605396
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=605396view=rev
Log:
Handle args appropriately for an apr app.
Backports r605395
Modified:
On Tue, 18 Dec 2007, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
On the positive side, the thing builds on both Linux and AIX (out of tree,
for httpd 2.2.6). I'll await the 0.9.1 tag before doing more elaborate
tests though.
Trunk should also be stable now, if you want to take a crack at that
before the
While open source is fantastic, and provides highly visible means.
It can still be hacked.
I can describe what has happened in this case:
1. joe hacker hacks one of the 'open source groups' machines.
at this point he is assumed to have access to the source code repository.
2. assume he
One point to consider is that if you are concerned about this you can
audit any changes.
Guy
On Thu, 2007-12-20 at 16:49 -0500, Ian Holsman wrote:
While open source is fantastic, and provides highly visible means.
It can still be hacked.
I can describe what has happened in this case:
1.
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 21:49:54 -
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+ * mod_disk_cache: Delete temporary files if they cannot be
renamed to their
+ final name.
+ Trunk version of patch:
+ http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi?rev=409942view=rev
+ Backport version for 2.2.x of
On 12/20/2007 11:25 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 21:49:54 -
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+ * mod_disk_cache: Delete temporary files if they cannot be
renamed to their
+ final name.
+ Trunk version of patch:
+
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 12/19/2007 04:02 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: wrowe
Date: Tue Dec 18 19:02:57 2007
New Revision: 605396
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=605396view=rev
Sorry for nitpicking, but
1. Where is the vote on this backport?
I'm happy to revert if that's
Niklas Edmundsson wrote:
On Tue, 18 Dec 2007, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
On the positive side, the thing builds on both Linux and AIX (out of
tree, for httpd 2.2.6). I'll await the 0.9.1 tag before doing more
elaborate tests though.
Trunk should also be stable now, if you want to take a
Ian Holsman wrote:
While open source is fantastic, and provides highly visible means.
It can still be hacked.
I can describe what has happened in this case:
1. joe hacker hacks one of the 'open source groups' machines.
at this point he is assumed to have access to the source code
15 matches
Mail list logo
