I didn't get time to do the mod_limitipconn merge before the summer
vacation, so I'm giving it a new try.
From the previous discussion i think we got to the following
conclusion:
- It's a good idea
- No licence grant necessary as it's relicensed ASL (or?)
I can do the importing into
Niklas Edmundsson wrote:
I can do the importing into trunk, but I'll need some pointers on where
to place it (I'd prefer a final destination, it's too stable for
experimental IMHO), where to poke at the build system and finally how to
get documentation into place.
After selecting a final
I don't quite understand...
Niklas Edmundsson wrote:
The main problem with mod_limitipconn-0.22 was that since mod_cache runs
as a quick handler, mod_limitipconn also must run as a quick handler
with all those benefits and drawbacks.
... MIME types exempt from limit checking ...
hashes are
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
We might not be able to do much about that anyways but it should probably
be documented that it doesn't limit connections or assist in preventing
DoS attacks.
Are you talking about mod_limitipconn? If you are, then
Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
We might not be able to do much about that anyways but it should probably
be documented that it doesn't limit connections or assist in preventing
DoS attacks.
Are you talking about mod_limitipconn? If you are, then rename it to
On Fri, 22 Aug 2008, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
I don't quite understand...
Niklas Edmundsson wrote:
The main problem with mod_limitipconn-0.22 was that since mod_cache runs as
a quick handler, mod_limitipconn also must run as a quick handler with all
those benefits and drawbacks.
...
Niklas Edmundsson wrote:
[...] are probably more content with this for now than having to wait
for someone committing the Perfecttm solution to httpd :)
Right; I'm not saying don't commit it (things can be fixed in trunk, that's
the point), but as you mentioned you want to get the naming
Niklas Edmundsson wrote:
I can do the importing into trunk, but I'll need some pointers on where
to place it (I'd prefer a final destination, it's too stable for
experimental IMHO)
this is a form of authorization, it appears to fit in aaa. Perhaps even
with a name in that scheme, such as
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
I'm pointing out this isn't a connection limit, it's a request limit, and
we should probably commit it with an appropriate module name :)
mod_req_limit or another variant thereof?
- --
Arturo Buanzo Busleiman
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Niklas Edmundsson wrote:
I can do the importing into trunk, but I'll need some pointers on
where to place it (I'd prefer a final destination, it's too stable for
experimental IMHO)
this is a form of authorization, it appears to fit in aaa. Perhaps even
with a
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Thoughts?
I think doing *something* is good.
I'm not sure tagging 2.3.0 or having another Apache 3.0 D {ream} session
is the right thing
Right now we just need someone to write lots of code and get us started.
/imo.
Having said that, I would he happy to
Nick Kew wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Niklas Edmundsson wrote:
I can do the importing into trunk, but I'll need some pointers on
where to place it (I'd prefer a final destination, it's too stable
for experimental IMHO)
this is a form of authorization, it appears to fit in aaa.
Niklas Edmundsson wrote:
I didn't get time to do the mod_limitipconn merge before the summer
vacation, so I'm giving it a new try.
From the previous discussion i think we got to the following
conclusion:
- It's a good idea
- No licence grant necessary as it's relicensed ASL (or?)
I'd be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Paul Querna wrote:
One might just magically appear if people would like it
I would! Abracadabra!
- --
Arturo Buanzo Busleiman
Independent Linux and Security Consultant - SANS - OISSG - OWASP
http://www.buanzo.com.ar/pro/eng.html
Mailing List
On 08/22/2008 03:03 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
I'm thinking of tagging 2.3.0 alpha a month before we gather in New Orleans
for ApacheCon 2008/US http://us.apachecon.com/c/acus2008/ so that we can
begin to gather community feedback and actually /do/ something about it at
the hackathon.
On Fri, 22 Aug 2008, Nick Kew wrote:
this is a form of authorization, it appears to fit in aaa. Perhaps even
with a name in that scheme, such as mod_authz_hostlimit or something like
that.
I'd say that's stretching a point. But since I don't think I can
suggest an existing category into
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 08/22/2008 03:03 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
I'm thinking of tagging 2.3.0 alpha a month before we gather in New Orleans
for ApacheCon 2008/US http://us.apachecon.com/c/acus2008/ so that we can
begin to gather community feedback and actually /do/ something about
Niklas Edmundsson wrote:
On Fri, 22 Aug 2008, Nick Kew wrote:
this is a form of authorization, it appears to fit in aaa. Perhaps even
with a name in that scheme, such as mod_authz_hostlimit or something
like that.
I'd say that's stretching a point. But since I don't think I can
suggest an
18 matches
Mail list logo
