Jordi Prats wrote:
Hi all,
There's any way to formally propose this littler change to mod_status?
Jordi
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 9:57 AM, Jordi Prats <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 7:04 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jordi Prats wrote:
I don't know abou
On Sep 8, 2008, at 9:26 AM, Dan Poirier wrote:
I've noticed that when MaxKeepAliveRequests is set to N, each
connection handles up to N+1 requests.
To me this seemed surprising, but a co-worker interprets
MaxKeepAliveRequests as the number of additional requests served
due to KeepAlive, which
Hello,
- discussion on dtrace patches by Theo seems to have wound down
lately, with only the build steps being problematic.
Here is the least that we could do while the conf|build steps are
figured out. (so that more probes can be added in the meantime.)
1) we need apache_pro
I've noticed that when MaxKeepAliveRequests is set to N, each
connection handles up to N+1 requests.
To me this seemed surprising, but a co-worker interprets
MaxKeepAliveRequests as the number of additional requests served
due to KeepAlive, which would make this exactly right.
I'm wondering what
IMO, the suggested patch does what it's supposed to do and doesn't
cause any regressions. As such, +1 for folding into trunk.
Hi all,
There's any way to formally propose this littler change to mod_status?
Jordi
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 9:57 AM, Jordi Prats <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 7:04 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Jordi Prats wrote:
>>>
>>> I don't know about other i