I'll fix that! And the stub code. WRT to gcc-4.2.3-2ubuntu7 of Sept
3, 2008, I don't have access to that environment but it looks correct to
me. I'll be able to get gcc-4.2.3 but only on Mandriva.
sorry,
Guy
On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 14:41 -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2008
Sorry, that's called 'too much Perl'.
Guy
On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 16:36 -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Ruediger Pluem wrote:
> >
> > C++ style comments are not liked by all C compilers.
>
> I suppose the proper answer then is
>
> /* //# why mess around, therefore static */
>
> ? ;-) Just
I'll fix that.
Guy
On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 14:40 -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 2:19 PM, Ruediger Pluem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> + //# why mess around, therefore static
> >
> > C++ style comments are not liked by all C compilers.
>
> True, but if you look at the
This looks reasonable to me but I haven't had a chance to test it
myself.
Guy
On Wed, 2008-09-03 at 11:47 +0300, Ohad Lutzky wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We've been using flood for a project, and couldn't get revision 672044
> to compile in gcc-4.2.3-2ubuntu7 without the attached patch. The error
> we go
On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 8:57 AM, Arnab Ganguly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All,
> How do I enable lingering_close in Apache.Is it enabled by default in
> Apache 2.2.8 ?
>
yes.
> Is there anyway to check it.
>
Trace the system calls. On Linux, you can run strace against one of the
worker pr
On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 4:38 AM, Ruediger Pluem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> +bb = apr_brigade_create(r->pool, c->bucket_alloc);
>>
>
> This is bad. Please store the brigade in the filter context and reuse it,
> by cleaning it. See also
> http://httpd.apache.org/docs/trunk/en/developer/outpu
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 2:44 PM, Ruediger Pluem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think we only vote on code and not on docco.
> So IMHO you could backport without votes.
Ya, but since I only made the commit to trunk this morning, I figured
I'd let it sit. If Jim wants to backport, he can. -- justi
On 09/16/2008 11:13 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jerenkrantz
Date: Tue Sep 16 14:13:02 2008
New Revision: 696062
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=696062&view=rev
Log:
* STATUS: Propose minor docco fix for backport.
I think we only vote on code and not on docco.
So IMHO you could
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 2:36 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I suppose the proper answer then is
>
> /* //# why mess around, therefore static */
>
> ? ;-) Justin, I think you could have dropped the #
Hey, bub, you're the one who committed this code - not me. =) -- justin
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 2:19 PM, Ruediger Pluem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> + //# why mess around, therefore static
>
> C++ style comments are not liked by all C compilers.
True, but if you look at the hardcoded paths a few lines up, well, ya,
there's a lot of work that would need to be done to
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
C++ style comments are not liked by all C compilers.
I suppose the proper answer then is
/* //# why mess around, therefore static */
? ;-) Justin, I think you could have dropped the #
On 09/16/2008 10:41 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jerenkrantz
Date: Tue Sep 16 13:41:45 2008
New Revision: 696047
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=696047&view=rev
Log:
Fix up flood_subst_file implementation so that we compile again on Mac OS X.
Also fix up various nits, add licens
On 09/16/2008 09:05 PM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 7:02 AM, Ruediger Pluem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Given the fact that Jim plans to T&R 2.2.10 mid-, late September
I triaged through the STATUS file. There are 10 proposal left
where 6 of them only miss one vote. From th
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 10:04 PM, Sander Temme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Folks,
>
> The following patch against trunk adds dynamic locking callbacks to mod_ssl.
> OpenSSL uses these in several places, including the CHIL engine that
> interfaces with the nCipher products. I work at nCipher, and
On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 7:02 AM, Ruediger Pluem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Given the fact that Jim plans to T&R 2.2.10 mid-, late September
> I triaged through the STATUS file. There are 10 proposal left
> where 6 of them only miss one vote. From the remaining 4 with only
> one vote two are still
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 11:41 AM, Tim Bray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just a piece of advice that, had I'd received it, would have saved me a
> couple days of yak shaving. -T
Doh. =)
Committed in r696006. Thanks. -- justin
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 2:28 AM, Ohad Lutzky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From flood_report_relative_times.c (SVN):
>
>/* FIXME: this call may need to be in a critical section */
> #if APR_HAS_THREADS
>apr_file_printf(local_stdout, "%s %ld %s\n", buf,
> apr_os_thread_current(), req->uri);
>
Just a piece of advice that, had I'd received it, would have saved me
a couple days of yak shaving. -T
===
--- INSTALL (revision 695999)
+++ INSTALL (working copy)
@@ -37,6 +37,12 @@
include a sufficiently r
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 1:47 AM, Ohad Lutzky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We've been using flood for a project, and couldn't get revision 672044
> to compile in gcc-4.2.3-2ubuntu7 without the attached patch. The error
> we got was:
>
> flood_round_robin.c: In function 'round_robin_profile
I recently contributed a new %k log format that is intended to log how
many requests have been handled on the current connection. It does this
by logging the value of conn->keepalives.
However, conn->keepalives isn't, strictly speaking, the number of
requests the connection has handled. If k
>> Is it possible to add some flags to the EOS metadata bucket? For example,
>> to have a 'continuation' EOS bucket, which would cause the MPM to
>> 'replay' the original http request after a certain time (or on demand).
>> In essence there would be 2 separate requests, but they would share the
21 matches
Mail list logo
