- Original Message
From: Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com
To: Steve Hay steve...@planit.com; apreq-dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, March 5, 2009 6:46:33 AM
Subject: Re: Volunteer for RMing 2.12?
- Original Message
From: Steve Hay
To: Joe Schaefer ;
- Original Message
From: Steve Hay steve...@planit.com
To: Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com; apreq-dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, March 5, 2009 11:46:12 AM
Subject: RE: Volunteer for RMing 2.12?
Joe Schaefer wrote:
- Original Message
From: Steve Hay
- Original Message
From: Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com
To: Steve Hay steve...@planit.com; apreq-dev@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, March 5, 2009 11:59:21 AM
Subject: Re: Volunteer for RMing 2.12?
- Original Message
From: Steve Hay
To: Joe Schaefer ;
Hello
I've created mod_dbd analogue for memcached (named connection pools to
memcached servers, see also
http://www.mail-archive.com/d...@httpd.apache.org/msg42922.html).
It's now based on libmemcached (http://tangent.org/552/libmemcached.html).
The question I want to ask is should I base my
Frank Meier wrote:
thanks for your replies, I tried the use of bucketbrigades as Chris
Kukuchka suggested. Unfortunately this lead to the same behaviour.
I also tried the *hack* approach (accessing the socket directly), where
I had the problem of getting to the socket itself. I didn't
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 12:56 AM, Nick Kew n...@webthing.com wrote:
Sounds OK in principle for trunk. If you want to post a patch
against trunk, I'll try and find the time to review it.
Here I am again.
The patch works well for us.
Is there something else that I can do for now?
--
Marko
Saju Pillai wrote:
Frank Meier wrote:
Hi
I'm working with a proprietary apache module which communicates (through
a socket) with another backend application (I have the C source code of
the module). I've now found out, when the client closes the http
connection during a request, the module does
Joe Schaefer wrote:
- Original Message
From: Steve Hay steve...@planit.com
To: Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com; apreq-...@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, March 5, 2009 4:03:40 AM
Subject: RE: Volunteer for RMing 2.12?
Joe Schaefer wrote:
I cut a tarball from trunk that
Joe Schaefer wrote:
- Original Message
From: Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com
To: Steve Hay steve...@planit.com; apreq-...@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, March 5, 2009 6:46:33 AM
Subject: Re: Volunteer for RMing 2.12?
- Original Message
From: Steve Hay
To: Joe
Hello
I've created mod_dbd analogue for memcached (named connection pools to
memcached servers, see also
http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@httpd.apache.org/msg42922.html).
It's now based on libmemcached (http://tangent.org/552/libmemcached.html).
The question I want to ask is should I base my
I suspect that it is a limitation of mod_dbd, but is there a way of
having two database connections to different databases of different
types in the same context?
I can see that it is possible at the APR-Util level, but mod_dbd doesn't
seem to allow for this.
Andrew
--
Andrew Ford
South
On 05.03.2009 16:41, Andrew Ford wrote:
I suspect that it is a limitation of mod_dbd, but is there a way of
having two database connections to different databases of different
types in the same context?
I can see that it is possible at the APR-Util level, but mod_dbd doesn't
seem to allow for
On 3/5/09 9:57 AM, Kevac Marko ma...@kevac.org wrote:
The question I want to ask is should I base my module on apr_memcache
or not? Is apr_memcache mature enough? Whether is is used by someone?
Yes. Yes. Yes.
Is this based on the existing mod_memcache?
--Brian
- Original Message
From: Steve Hay steve...@planit.com
To: Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com; apreq-...@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, March 5, 2009 8:52:58 AM
Subject: RE: Volunteer for RMing 2.12?
Steve Hay wrote:
Joe Schaefer wrote:
- Original Message
From:
THx for the feedback, new tarball available!
- Original Message
From: Philippe M. Chiasson go...@ectoplasm.org
To: Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com
Cc: apreq-...@httpd.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, March 5, 2009 11:06:11 AM
Subject: Re: Volunteer for RMing 2.12?
On 4/3/09
Chris Darroch wrote:
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
Yes, that is what I prefer as well. All paperwork is done, so please
let us know when you have an export. I (or one of the other svnadmins)
will have to massage it a bit to prefix the sourceforge ids, so just
point us to the dump file when you
Kevac Marko wrote:
Here I am again.
The patch works well for us.
Is there something else that I can do for now?
I'm going to try to find some time to take a look -- thanks for the
patch; it's good to see the DBDGroup idea being taken further than
my initial notions.
On an initial quick
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 6:53 PM, Brian Akins br...@akins.org wrote:
Is this based on the existing mod_memcache?
No. It is based on mod_dbd. New one
(http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@httpd.apache.org/msg42922.html) to be
precise.
mod_memcache, if we are talking about
Chris, thank you. I am impressed.
I'm not experienced in commiting patches to open source projects, so I
am very thankful for your comments.
I'll try to fix things up very soon.
80 columns is a little bit ancient requirement in the world of 22
LCDs, but ok, i'll fix that too.
--
Marko Kevac
Chris Darroch wrote:
Over in mod_dbd.h, Nick's old copyright statement is removed.
That's definitely something which, if needed, should be dealt with
separately -- I'm not sure if it should be there or not, but it's
a legal issue not a coding one.
OK, guess it's best if I deal with that
On Mar 5, 2009, at 4:35 PM, Kevac Marko wrote:
ise.
mod_memcache, if we are talking about
http://code.google.com/p/modmemcache/, is too simple.
Works fine for me :)
I need multiple name pools to multiple servers. Something like
Will you implement a default pool like mod_dbd does?
On Mar 5, 2009, at 4:52 PM, Kevac Marko wrote:
80 columns is a little bit ancient requirement in the world of 22
LCDs, but ok, i'll fix that too.
Not when you have 4 code branches side by side...
Also, netbooks are pretty popular as well. Most of my coding is done
on a 15 laptop screen.
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 2:02 AM, M. Brian Akins br...@akins.org wrote:
Will you implement a default pool like mod_dbd does?
Yes
This feature enables us to create dynamic, not static servers list.
For high availability clusters for example.
Sounds interesting, I suppose. I just generate my
23 matches
Mail list logo
