+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 10:44 PM, Paul Querna wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 10:25 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
>> Paul Querna wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 9:17 PM, wrote:
Author: mturk
Date: Sun Mar 29 19:17:30 2009
New Revision: 759751
URL: http://svn.apach
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 10:25 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> Paul Querna wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 9:17 PM, wrote:
>>>
>>> Author: mturk
>>> Date: Sun Mar 29 19:17:30 2009
>>> New Revision: 759751
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=759751&view=rev
>>> Log:
>>> Use child singleton
Paul Querna wrote:
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 9:17 PM, wrote:
Author: mturk
Date: Sun Mar 29 19:17:30 2009
New Revision: 759751
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=759751&view=rev
Log:
Use child singleton watchdog for running the heartbeat module
Modified:
httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/cluster
Paul Querna wrote:
I'm looking at the API exposed by mod_watchdog.h, and its not quite
feeling right.
If we want this to be an API used easily, I think we should just make
them proper timers (ie, run function X in singleton in 10 seconds),
and when the timer finishes, it can re-register -- this
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 9:17 PM, wrote:
> Author: mturk
> Date: Sun Mar 29 19:17:30 2009
> New Revision: 759751
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=759751&view=rev
> Log:
> Use child singleton watchdog for running the heartbeat module
>
> Modified:
> httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/cluster/mod
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 7:36 PM, Graham Leggett wrote:
> Paul Querna wrote:
>
>> no, this is just a utility module, which tells you where other members
>> are.
>>
>> second, mod_backhand has never been ported to 2.x, and it does allow
>> you to autoconfigure on cloud-enviroments, which mostly do n
Paul Querna wrote:
no, this is just a utility module, which tells you where other members are.
second, mod_backhand has never been ported to 2.x, and it does allow
you to autoconfigure on cloud-enviroments, which mostly do not have
private VLANs for multicast.
I'm trying to keep it as a simple
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 7:28 PM, ntwrkd wrote:
> Can you explain why this would not be accomplishable through
> mod_proxy_balancer and would merit it's own module?
1) it is not currently possibly to add proxy workers without a
graceful restart, meaning you either need to script or have an admin
d
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 6:00 PM, Graham Leggett wrote:
> Paul Querna wrote:
>
>> The (vaporware) solution: mod_cloudbeat automatically finds all of your
>> nodes,
>> both front end load balancers and backend application servers. All load
>> balancing is completely configurationless if using mod_s
Can you explain why this would not be accomplishable through
mod_proxy_balancer and would merit it's own module?
I think also mod_rest_cache could be utilized to invalidate objects
throughout various cloud CDN's.
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 9:35 AM, Sander Temme wrote:
>
> On Mar 29, 2009, at 9:00 AM
On Mar 29, 2009, at 9:00 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:
Paul Querna wrote:
The (vaporware) solution: mod_cloudbeat automatically finds all of
your nodes,
both front end load balancers and backend application servers. All
load
balancing is completely configurationless if using mod_serf -- you
Paul Querna wrote:
The (vaporware) solution: mod_cloudbeat automatically finds all of your nodes,
both front end load balancers and backend application servers. All load
balancing is completely configurationless if using mod_serf -- you just
turn on a new application server instance, and mod_cl
The Problem: You just bought into whole cloud computing craze. But how do you
load balance to this constantly changing fabric, without sysadmins
constantly changing
server configurations. Most generic cloud computing platforms , for
example Amazon EC2,
provide almost no way of load balancing lar
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 4:19 AM, wrote:
> Author: mturk
> Date: Sun Mar 29 08:19:02 2009
> New Revision: 759647
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=759647&view=rev
> Log:
> Do not presume we have a clean stack
>
> Modified:
>httpd/httpd/trunk/server/mpm_unix.c
>
> Modified: httpd/httpd/
Hello,
I'm using apreq2 (Ubuntu Intrepid version 2.08-5build1) and I'm trying to
parse the incoming POST submitted XML requests with it, however the very
simple code below fails to build the body_table with APREQ_ERROR_NOPARSER.
I've checked the latest SVN code and on one hand it seems apreq2 is
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 6:42 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>
>
> On 03/29/2009 10:29 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> > Ruediger Pluem wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>> $ ./httpd -k start
> >>> httpd: illegal option -- k
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Is there some new config directive that needs
> >>> to be added since mpm redesi
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 6:51 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>
>
> On 03/25/2009 03:50 PM, traw...@apache.org wrote:
> > Author: trawick
> > Date: Wed Mar 25 14:50:24 2009
> > New Revision: 758278
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=758278&view=rev
> > Log:
> > The rewrite-args hook isn't ava
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 11:05 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
> On 03/28/2009 12:10 AM, pque...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: pquerna
>> Date: Fri Mar 27 23:10:21 2009
>> New Revision: 759386
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=759386&view=rev
>> +static void * merge_server_config(apr_pool_t
On 03/25/2009 03:50 PM, traw...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: trawick
> Date: Wed Mar 25 14:50:24 2009
> New Revision: 758278
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=758278&view=rev
> Log:
> The rewrite-args hook isn't available to MPM DSOs. Piggy-back on the
> linked-in mod_unixd.c to handle
- Original Message
> From: Nick Kew
> To: modules-...@httpd.apache.org
> Sent: Wednesday, March 25, 2009 4:10:39 PM
> Subject: Re: Input filter to process POST variables (e.g. mod_form)
>
>
> On 25 Mar 2009, at 14:34, Erik Westland wrote
>
> >
> >> From: Erik Westland
> >> To: modu
On 03/29/2009 10:29 AM, Mladen Turk wrote:
> Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> $ ./httpd -k start
>>> httpd: illegal option -- k
>>>
>>>
>>> Is there some new config directive that needs
>>> to be added since mpm redesign, or it's just
>>> a temporary bug?
>>
>> I guess it is bug that has somethin
On 03/28/2009 12:10 AM, pque...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: pquerna
> Date: Fri Mar 27 23:10:21 2009
> New Revision: 759386
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=759386&view=rev
> Log:
> Work in Progress.
>
> Add Clustered proxying support to mod_serf, by using the heartbeats system.
>
> N
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
$ ./httpd -k start
httpd: illegal option -- k
Is there some new config directive that needs
to be added since mpm redesign, or it's just
a temporary bug?
I guess it is bug that has something to do with
how ap_mpm_rewrite_args is now called.
Well they were not called
pque...@apache.org wrote:
Author: pquerna
Date: Sat Mar 28 15:03:01 2009
New Revision: 759476
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=759476&view=rev
Log:
Add static cluster backend, for very simple configurations.
Paul I own you some beers :-)
Cheers
Jean-frederic
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 03/28/2009 08:11 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Current trunk gives the
$ ./httpd -k start
httpd: illegal option -- k
Is there some new config directive that needs
to be added since mpm redesign, or it's just
a temporary bug?
I guess it is bug that has something to do with
26 matches
Mail list logo
