Thanks everyone, for your responses!
I will try these tools out.
2009/6/3 Jérôme Renard j...@ez.no
Hello,
Sorin Manolache a écrit :
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 19:41, Elison Smith elison.sm...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
(I realize that this question is not an exact fit for this mailing list)
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
-1; please stop committing documentation updates without introducing
the appropriate compatibility notes!
As this is already on our site, for an unreleased version, it looks
particularly stupid.
Bill
cove...@apache.org wrote:
Author: covener
Date: Wed Dec 24 07:07:11 2008
New Revision:
mod_ftp fans;
Let's try this one more time, here's a 0.9.4 candidate which should have
none of the 2.0 or 2.2 compatibility problems of the previous attempt.
Thanks to everyone who spent the effort reviewing that package!
Please fetch up the newly prepared httpd-mod_ftp-0.9.4.tar.gz (available
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 5:35 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
-1; please stop committing documentation updates without introducing
the appropriate compatibility notes!
As this is already on our site, for an unreleased version, it looks
particularly stupid.
2.2.x has the
Eric Covener wrote:
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 5:35 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
-1; please stop committing documentation updates without introducing
the appropriate compatibility notes!
As this is already on our site, for an unreleased version, it looks
particularly
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 7:37 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
Nope; As far as 2.4 documentation, there's really no need IMHO, but
I guess it's nice for folks making a transition.
Spot-checking, looks like it's best to have/add it matching in trunk
for consistency.
--
Eric
