hi,
I'm newbie in APR and need develop a module that forward request to cluster.
The same in mod_rewrite with flag [P].
That module, I processing the object request_rec-uri and set what machine
in cluster forward the request.
Thank you.
Ricardo
--
View this message in context:
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 9:34 AM, ricardo13ricardoogra...@gmail.com wrote:
hi,
I'm newbie in APR and need develop a module that forward request to cluster.
The same in mod_rewrite with flag [P].
That module, I processing the object request_rec-uri and set what machine
in cluster forward the
I'm newbie in APR ... the same in mod_rewrite with flag [P].
If the mod_rewrite does what you need, you should use that rather than
re-writing an alternate version on your own.
Thanks,
Rick Houser
Auto-Owners Insurance
Systems Support
(517)703-2580
-Original Message-
From: ricardo13
Hi,
Houser, Rick wrote:
I'm newbie in APR ... the same in mod_rewrite with flag [P].
If the mod_rewrite does what you need, you should use that rather than
re-writing an alternate version on your own.
Yep, but mod_rewrite doesn't enable I modify request_rec structure, then I
will do
Eric Covener wrote:
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 9:53 AM, Eric Covenercove...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 9:48 AM, ricardo13ricardoogra...@gmail.com
wrote:
Only opinion. Is this difficult ?? or easy ??
Because I haven't idea !!
It's difficult. I'd suggest finding a way to use
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 10:06 AM, ricardo13ricardoogra...@gmail.com wrote:
It's difficult. I'd suggest finding a way to use existing modules.
Use or modify, that is.
Can my module to use mod_proxy for forward requests ? How do I do it ?
I'm not convinced you need a module. mod_rewrite
Eric Covener wrote:
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 10:06 AM, ricardo13ricardoogra...@gmail.com
wrote:
It's difficult. I'd suggest finding a way to use existing modules.
Use or modify, that is.
Can my module to use mod_proxy for forward requests ? How do I do it ?
I'm not convinced you need
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 10:33 AM, ricardo13ricardoogra...@gmail.com wrote:
Eric Covener wrote:
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 10:06 AM, ricardo13ricardoogra...@gmail.com
wrote:
It's difficult. I'd suggest finding a way to use existing modules.
Use or modify, that is.
Can my module to use
Eric Covener wrote:
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 10:33 AM, ricardo13ricardoogra...@gmail.com
wrote:
Eric Covener wrote:
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 10:06 AM, ricardo13ricardoogra...@gmail.com
wrote:
It's difficult. I'd suggest finding a way to use existing modules.
Use or modify, that is.
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 10:46 AM, ricardo13ricardoogra...@gmail.com wrote:
Not arbitrarily. You can store that value in a note (r-notes) and
set/query via rewrite if you're not looking to do much development.
You can store that value in a note (r-notes)
How do I do it ?? Remember, using
Eric Covener wrote:
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 10:46 AM, ricardo13ricardoogra...@gmail.com
wrote:
Not arbitrarily. You can store that value in a note (r-notes) and
set/query via rewrite if you're not looking to do much development.
You can store that value in a note (r-notes)
How do I
Hi,
I'm studying proxy in mod_rewrite and I saw the following line:
request_rec *r;
r-proxyreq == PROXYREQ_PROXY;
But in httpd.h, the request_rec object hasn't field proxyreq.
What's this ??
Thank you
Ricardo
ricardo13 wrote:
hi,
I'm newbie in APR and need develop a module that
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 1:30 PM, ricardo13ricardoogra...@gmail.com wrote:
r-proxyreq == PROXYREQ_PROXY;
But in httpd.h, the request_rec object hasn't field proxyreq.
What's this ??
In my 2.2.x headers it's an int in the request_rec.
--
Eric Covener
cove...@gmail.com
Hi,
I wrote a module that adds a header and a footer to html output and that
works pretty well. The problem ist that once i add a !--#include
virtual=/ssi/... -- directive the content included also gets that
header and footer applied. Is there a way to prevent the header/footer
filter from
I believe you should wrap your header/footer inserter inside an
if (!r-main ) {
...
}
block. So only the 'main' request is wrapped but not any subrequests.
Ron
On Mon, 2009-07-13 at 20:45 +0200, Dennis J. wrote:
Hi,
I wrote a module that adds a header and a footer to html output and
Works perfectly! Thanks!
Regards,
Dennis
On 07/13/2009 08:51 PM, Ronald Park wrote:
I believe you should wrap your header/footer inserter inside an
if (!r-main ) {
...
}
block. So only the 'main' request is wrapped but not any subrequests.
Ron
On Mon, 2009-07-13 at 20:45 +0200,
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
PR#47521 points out that when mod_authnz_ldap has some fatal LDAP
connectivity error, it doesn't allow other AuthBasicProviders to have
a shot at checking the userid.
It seems like the normal use case for two providers is when there are
two disjoint user repositories, and we only move on to
Eric Covener wrote:
/* For a 304 response, only change the headers */
-if (r-status == HTTP_NOT_MODIFIED) {
+if (r-status == HTTP_NOT_MODIFIED || r-header_only) {
Technically speaking, screws up the protocol.
IMHO it would be acceptable provided:
(a) it's an option
Nick Kew wrote:
Eric Covener wrote:
/* For a 304 response, only change the headers */
-if (r-status == HTTP_NOT_MODIFIED) {
+if (r-status == HTTP_NOT_MODIFIED || r-header_only) {
Technically speaking, screws up the protocol.
IMHO it would be acceptable
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
* do not do server-side deflation (it is expensive).
Whoops - forgot one more
* do not do content deflation, only transfer deflation, which
should not metered by the content-length, right?
Just finished the last showstopper. I would be happy to advance this
to release / general availability vote with the next release, if we can
determine just a few oddball issue resolutions. Jim and I have already
gone ahead and moved many internal interfaces out of the private headers,
which was
22 matches
Mail list logo
