Sorry for the long mail, especially in case all is well-known.
While looking for the right way to implement something like FCGIDGroup I
stumbled about something a bit strange in mod_fcgid.
When looking for an appropriate existing process to handle a request the
following data is used by
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 9:31 AM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.dewrote:
When looking for an appropriate existing process to handle a request the
following data is used by mod_fcgid:
- inode
inode num of the wrapper if one is used,
of the request filename otherwise
- deviceid
device
Hi Bill,
William A. Rowe, Jr. schrieb:
Then I'll roll tomorrow afternoon along with mod_fcgid. We have two ways to
handle this; FTPOptions NoUTF8Feature, or something like;
--- mod_ftp.c (revision 816386)
+++ mod_ftp.c (working copy)
@@ -86,12 +86,14 @@
Guenter Knauf wrote:
I would prefer the 'FTPOptions NoUTF8Feature' thing because IIRC (its
been 5,6 years back when we discussed that with Novell's core
developers) we can now build an UTF8-enabled Apache, just its not what
we do by default; so ifdef by platform is not right, at least not for
Whilst the main software install is put under DESTDIR, the manual and
eventually the config file when there is one, ignore the DESTDIR
setting. This is a problem for downstream packagers, which is resolved
for me by the attached patch.
Cheers, Paul.--- mod_fcgid-2.3.1/Makefile.apxs 2009-09-04
The mod_fcgid build fails for me due to erroneously detecting
sys/mutex.h when in fact it's not present. This appears to be due to a
copy-and-paste error in build/Makefile.apxs, resolved by the attached
patch.
Cheers, Paul.--- mod_fcgid-2.3.1/build/Makefile.apxs 2009-08-27 12:33:51.0
Bill,
William A. Rowe, Jr. schrieb:
To confirm; if UTF8 characters are *invalid* and won't be accepted for
path names, this feature should be set. If the server *can* name files
in UTF8 this is the correct feature, even if the file names would appear
'odd' to the local user. This is why the
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 5:10 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 4:44 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net
wrote:
What state do you feel the module is in? When should we cut a beta
to put the improvements-to-date into users hands?
I think it is in
Hi Jeff,
after another evening, this is what i came up with:
Goals:
1. I do not want to mess around with /etc/apache2/conf.d/mod_fcgid.conf
2. I do not want to be forced to always use mod_fcgid on virtual hosts that are
configured for mod_cgi (from Plesk)
I achieve this by doing all necessary
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org wrote:
The mod_fcgid build fails for me due to erroneously detecting
sys/mutex.h when in fact it's not present. This appears to be due to a
copy-and-paste error in build/Makefile.apxs, resolved by the attached
patch.
Cheers,
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 11:30 AM, Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org wrote:
Whilst the main software install is put under DESTDIR, the manual and
eventually the config file when there is one, ignore the DESTDIR
setting. This is a problem for downstream packagers, which is resolved
for me by the
(AFAICT)
On 09/22/2009 09:19 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Sunday 13 September 2009, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Sunday 13 September 2009, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 09/13/2009 01:11 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/trunk/developer/output-filters.htm
l recommends to reuse bucket
On 09/23/2009 10:10 PM, traw...@apache.org wrote:
Author: trawick
Date: Wed Sep 23 20:10:02 2009
New Revision: 818234
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=818234view=rev
Log:
the request body size should be tracked and checked against
apr_off_t, not size_t and int
Modified:
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 5:04 PM, Ruediger Pluem rpl...@apache.org wrote:
On 09/23/2009 10:10 PM, traw...@apache.org wrote:
Author: trawick
Date: Wed Sep 23 20:10:02 2009
New Revision: 818234
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=818234view=rev
Log:
the request body size should be
Bill,
William A. Rowe, Jr. schrieb:
Guenter Knauf wrote:
BTW I've just tested 'FTPOptions NoUTF8Feature' - gave me no error
during start, but still get UTF8 with feature list ...
hopefully I have a bit time to investigate that further later - unless
you beat me :)
Inheritance issue,
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 6:21 PM, minf...@apache.org wrote:
Author: minfrin
Date: Wed Sep 23 22:21:54 2009
New Revision: 818287
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=818287view=rev
Log:
Bump minor mmn after addition of mod_proxy_scgi
Why? The MMN is for programming interfaces. Does
Jeff Trawick wrote:
Bump minor mmn after addition of mod_proxy_scgi
Why? The MMN is for programming interfaces. Does mod_proxy_scgi
provide any?
Sorry, my bad - will revert.
Regards,
Graham
--
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
I initially opened a bug for this downstream (See Fedora #523903[1]),
but the Fedora mod_fcgid maintainer Paul suggested I open up the
discussion here.
I was recently working on configuring some of my servers to use the
worker MPM instead of prefork to be able to handle more concurrent
Guenter Knauf wrote:
Bill,
William A. Rowe, Jr. schrieb:
To confirm; if UTF8 characters are *invalid* and won't be accepted for
path names, this feature should be set. If the server *can* name files
in UTF8 this is the correct feature, even if the file names would appear
'odd' to the local
Guenter Knauf wrote:
Bill,
William A. Rowe, Jr. schrieb:
Guenter Knauf wrote:
BTW I've just tested 'FTPOptions NoUTF8Feature' - gave me no error
during start, but still get UTF8 with feature list ...
hopefully I have a bit time to investigate that further later - unless
you beat me :)
Jeff Trawick wrote:
(AFAICT)
That was my guess as well, have that message open and looking at it now.
Hi all,
The tarballs are (will soon be) at http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/.
This release contains fixes for the following security issues:
*) SECURITY: CVE-2009-2699 (cve.mitre.org)
Fixed in APR 1.3.9. Faulty error handling in the Solaris
pollset support (Event Port backend)
wr...@apache.org wrote:
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=818315view=rev
Log:
Validate r818275 by bundling apr 1.3.9 version.
Should I recreate the binaries? (I've taken them offline so they don't
sync).
Regards,
Graham
--
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
FWIW, the Python specific hosting module called mod_wsgi for Apache
implements named daemon process groups, with ability to control how
WSGI applications are delegated to which process group. This includes
being able to optionally have process group selected based on value of
ENV value set by
Graham Leggett wrote:
The tarballs are (will soon be) at http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/.
Tarballs rolled with apr v1.3.9:
SHA1(httpd-2.2.14.tar.bz2)= eacd04c87b489231ae708c84a77dc8e9ee176fd2
SHA1(httpd-2.2.14.tar.gz)= e6e20b3fc58a57a5116e036e31bf97d409db7cfa
Regards,
Graham
--
smime.p7s
On 23 Sep 2009, at 14:40, bugzi...@apache.org wrote:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15866
--- Comment #6 from Dan Poirier poir...@pobox.com 2009-09-23
06:40:13 PDT ---
Created an attachment (id=24306)
-- (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24306)
resend without attachments cause stupid mail server marked as virus ...
Hi Graham,
Graham Leggett schrieb:
The tarballs are (will soon be) at http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/.
This release contains fixes for the following security issues:
*) SECURITY: CVE-2009-2699 (cve.mitre.org)
28 matches
Mail list logo
