Re: slotmem improving doall

On 09/30/2009 06:18 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: On Sep 29, 2009, at 5:23 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote: Hi, I would like to change the doall / ap_slotmem_callback_fn_t logic. For the moment we can't stop the doall loop, but it could be interesting to do so (for example while search for a value

Re: mod_serf uses non-public API

On 10/01/2009 03:45 AM, Guenter Knauf wrote: Paul, Paul Querna schrieb: very likely, mod_serf in its current for should just be polished to replace mod_proxy_*, and all of the async stuff should be pushed towards the MPMs.. well the question is: do we want to export

Re: mod_fcgid - cannot get authorizer process to be started

Jeff Trawick wrote: On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Barry Scott barry.sc...@onelan.co.uk mailto:barry.sc...@onelan.co.uk wrote: At this point let me ask this: Is it possible with the current code to ever have the fcgid Authorizer called? yes thanks for the confirmation and

Re: [vote] release httpd-2.2.14?

Guenter Knauf wrote: still not sync'd, also my NetWare binaries not; there is something wrong ... Two emails to infrastructure@ have gone ignored, does anyone know what is going on? Regards, Graham -- smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

[Fwd: SvnPubSub websites -- need more volunteers]

Hi all, Does httpd want to volunteer for this? Regards, Graham -- ---BeginMessage--- Hi, apr.apache.org is now managed by SvnPubSub. I think we are ready to add more. Any volunteer TLPs? Once its done, any commit to your SVN repo for your site will be automatically propagated to the live

Re: svn commit: r820427 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk/modules: cluster/mod_heartmonitor.c core/mod_watchdog.c core/mod_watchdog.h

On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 9:56 PM, Guenter Knauf fua...@apache.org wrote: Hi Jeff, traw...@apache.org schrieb: Author: trawick Date: Wed Sep 30 20:00:37 2009 New Revision: 820427 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=820427view=rev Log: change the callable functions in the

simple MPM requires apr-trunk

So, what do we want to say is our earliest version of APR required for trunk (and 2.4)?? I'd like for us to really start looking at getting 2.4 out, but that means some APR dependencies, esp if we want Simple to be viable for lots of people.

Re: simple MPM requires apr-trunk

Jim Jagielski wrote: So, what do we want to say is our earliest version of APR required for trunk (and 2.4)?? I'd like for us to really start looking at getting 2.4 out, but that means some APR dependencies, esp if we want Simple to be viable for lots of people. The session stuff needs at

Re: simple MPM requires apr-trunk

On Oct 1, 2009, at 9:15 AM, Graham Leggett wrote: Jim Jagielski wrote: So, what do we want to say is our earliest version of APR required for trunk (and 2.4)?? I'd like for us to really start looking at getting 2.4 out, but that means some APR dependencies, esp if we want Simple to be

Re: slotmem improving doall

On Oct 1, 2009, at 3:44 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote: On 09/30/2009 06:18 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: On Sep 29, 2009, at 5:23 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote: Hi, I would like to change the doall / ap_slotmem_callback_fn_t logic. For the moment we can't stop the doall loop, but it could be

Re: mod_serf uses non-public API

On Sep 30, 2009, at 9:45 PM, Guenter Knauf wrote: Paul, Paul Querna schrieb: very likely, mod_serf in its current for should just be polished to replace mod_proxy_*, and all of the async stuff should be pushed towards the MPMs.. well the question is: do we want to export

Re: simple MPM requires apr-trunk

Jim Jagielski wrote: Yeah, but do we want to require 1.4, which means backporting the pollcb stuff, or do we want to require 2.0, which means httpd 2.4 will be pushed out even further...? I'd say backport the pollcb stuff. httpd v2.3.x alphas are out the door, while apr v2.x alphas aren't.

Re: slotmem improving doall

On 10/01/2009 04:06 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: On Oct 1, 2009, at 3:44 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote: On 09/30/2009 06:18 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: On Sep 29, 2009, at 5:23 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote: Hi, I would like to change the doall / ap_slotmem_callback_fn_t logic. For the moment

Re: simple MPM requires apr-trunk

On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 9:11 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote: So, what do we want to say is our earliest version of APR required for trunk (and 2.4)?? I'd like for us to really start looking at getting 2.4 out, but that means some APR dependencies, esp if we want Simple to be viable

Re: simple MPM requires apr-trunk

On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote: Jim Jagielski wrote: Yeah, but do we want to require 1.4, which means backporting the pollcb stuff, or do we want to require 2.0, which means httpd 2.4 will be pushed out even further...? I'd say backport the pollcb

Re: simple MPM requires apr-trunk

On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 11:09 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote: Jim Jagielski wrote: Yeah, but do we want to require 1.4, which means backporting the pollcb stuff, or do we want to require 2.0, which means

mod_fcgid - how to limit max processes per fcgi image

With mod_fastcgi I can to the following: FastCgiServer /usr/local/onelan/html/dsm.fcgi -processes 1 -idle-timeout 200 FastCgiServer /usr/local/onelan/html/dsmxml.fcgi -processes 1 -idle-timeout 30 Which creates two servers running waiting for request with only once instance of each. I

Re: mod_fcgid - how to limit max processes per fcgi image

On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 11:28 AM, Barry Scott barry.sc...@onelan.co.ukwrote: With mod_fastcgi I can to the following: FastCgiServer /usr/local/onelan/html/dsm.fcgi -processes 1 -idle-timeout 200 FastCgiServer /usr/local/onelan/html/dsmxml.fcgi -processes 1 -idle-timeout 30 Which creates

Re: mod_fcgid - how to limit max processes per fcgi image

Jeff Trawick wrote: On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 11:28 AM, Barry Scott barry.sc...@onelan.co.uk mailto:barry.sc...@onelan.co.uk wrote: With mod_fastcgi I can to the following: FastCgiServer /usr/local/onelan/html/dsm.fcgi -processes 1 -idle-timeout 200 FastCgiServer

[mod_fcgid proposal] defining processing options for particular commands

(instead of based on uri or vhost) FCGIDCommand /path/to/command IdleTimeout n MaxProcessLifetime n MinProcesses n MaxProcesses n MaxRequestsPerProcess n InitialEnv var[=val] ... class (the names of these options follow my proposal for the names of existing directives ;) ) When a

Re: slotmem improving doall

On Oct 1, 2009, at 10:21 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote: I mean if doall returns APR_INCOMPLETE, it means that it stopped at some point within the loop. Yes But how would the caller know where and how would the caller re-start the loop but say start here instead? That would be the

Re: simple MPM requires apr-trunk

On Oct 1, 2009, at 11:14 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 11:09 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote: Jim Jagielski wrote: Yeah, but do we want to require 1.4, which means backporting the pollcb

Re: simple MPM requires apr-trunk

On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote: On Oct 1, 2009, at 11:14 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 11:09 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote: Jim Jagielski wrote:

Re: [mod_fcgid] Cleaning up configuration directive names

On Tuesday 29 September 2009 4:20:49 pm you wrote: On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Ricardo Cantu rica...@smartcsc.com wrote: On Tuesday 29 September 2009 2:31:21 pm Jeff Trawick wrote: ZombieScanInterval (leave alone until processes can be reaped differently) Working on a patch for

[mod_fcgid patch] reap children without the zombie scan

(just fixing subject) On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 7:55 PM, Ricardo Cantu rica...@smartcsc.com wrote: On Tuesday 29 September 2009 4:20:49 pm you wrote: On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Ricardo Cantu rica...@smartcsc.com wrote: On Tuesday 29 September 2009 2:31:21 pm Jeff Trawick wrote: