Re: [PATCH] mod_fcgid: SEGV with empty output from fcgi process

2010-02-01 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 2:25 AM, Tatsuki Sugiura s...@nemui.org wrote: Hello, In Message Re: [PATCH] mod_fcgid: SEGV with empty output from fcgi process            cc67648e1001310433y67082e56nd76327314ad21...@mail.gmail.com, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com  said; a) is it better (and

FYI... tentatively planning to roll mod_fcgid again towards the end of the week...

2010-02-01 Thread Jeff Trawick
... to correct a regression when used with httpd 2.0.x on some Unix-ish platforms.

Re: [PATCH] mod_proxy sessions

2010-02-01 Thread yle
I reply in place ... 2010/2/1 Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm On 01 Feb 2010, at 6:09 PM, yle lists wrote: I'd like to submit a patch (against 2.2.14) that provides mod_proxy sessions handling, that is, the ability to bind backend connections (resources) to a session-id. When proxy

Re: [PATCH] mod_proxy sessions

2010-02-01 Thread Graham Leggett
On 01 Feb 2010, at 7:48 PM, yle wrote: Yes, it would be a better to use a module of its own, I have to better look at the proxy hooks to see how the proxy_session module could do the job elsewhere (most of the code would be that of the http module I guess, but I need to look closer). My

Re: FYI... tentatively planning to roll mod_fcgid again towards the end of the week...

2010-02-01 Thread Chris Darroch
Jeff Trawick wrote: ... to correct a regression when used with httpd 2.0.x on some Unix-ish platforms. OK, noted. I very much hope to pack in some additional changes to the wrapper management code this week; time's still on my side at the moment. I spent some of Friday on it but what

Re: mod_dav inconsistent behaviour for GET requests

2010-02-01 Thread Stefan Fritsch
On Sunday 31 January 2010, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 3:01 AM, Stefan Fritsch s...@sfritsch.de wrote: On Sat, 30 Jan 2010, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: I don't see how your patch would intentionally break - the failure mechanism is that the source scripts are served - not

Re: svn commit: r905406 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: CHANGES docs/manual/mod/mod_include.xml modules/filters/mod_include.c

2010-02-01 Thread Nick Kew
On Mon, 01 Feb 2010 20:43:01 - minf...@apache.org wrote: Author: minfrin Date: Mon Feb 1 20:43:01 2010 New Revision: 905406 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=905406view=rev Log: Allow fine control over the removal of Last-Modified and ETag headers within the INCLUDES filter,

Re: svn commit: r905406 - in /httpd/httpd/trunk: CHANGES docs/manual/mod/mod_include.xml modules/filters/mod_include.c

2010-02-01 Thread Graham Leggett
On 01 Feb 2010, at 11:24 PM, Nick Kew wrote: However, given what you've implemented, I think it would perhaps benefit from a third state for ETag and Last-Modified. Namely, allow both force-set and force-unset, as well as do-nothing (the default). Just reading your docs patch, there appears

Re: [PATCH] Logging the handler in the access log

2010-02-01 Thread Christian Folini
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 12:06:33AM +0200, Graham Leggett wrote: On 01 Feb 2010, at 10:59 PM, Christian Folini wrote: Sure. Here you go: Committed to trunk, and proposed for backport to v2.2. Thanks for this. My pleasure. Thank you. Best, Christian -- We must be diligent, we must keep

Re: FYI... tentatively planning to roll mod_fcgid again towards the end of the week...

2010-02-01 Thread Chris Darroch
Jeff Trawick wrote: ... to correct a regression when used with httpd 2.0.x on some Unix-ish platforms. OK, I have a first cut at what I'm hoping to commit shortly, unless anyone sees problems. Let me know if you want me to hold off until you've cut another GA; otherwise I'll continue