I can currently reproduce the following problem with 2.2.15 event MPM
under high load:
When an httpd child process gets closed due to the max spare threads
rule and it holds established client connections for which it has fully
received a keep alive request, but not yet send any part of the
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 7:19 AM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
I can currently reproduce the following problem with 2.2.15 event MPM under
high load:
When an httpd child process gets closed due to the max spare threads rule
and it holds established client connections for which it
we have an
browser -asynchronous router software(that uses mina framework)- tomcat
We have client side Persistent connection(PC) and server side PC can be
enabled or diaabled
Jmeter : i have configured.
http://localhost:7072/?service=echoservicepausetime=100size=1024;;
If we hit normal
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 8:48 AM, ragu5050 ragunath...@gmail.com wrote:
So why this happening in PC alone.???
And also please let me know how to test this scenraio ,so that it reads
response in case of PC also properly.
http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html
--
Eric Covener
On 23.03.2010 13:34, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 7:19 AM, Rainer Jungrainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
I can currently reproduce the following problem with 2.2.15 event MPM under
high load:
When an httpd child process gets closed due to the max spare threads rule
and it holds
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 10:04 AM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
On 23.03.2010 13:34, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 7:19 AM, Rainer Jungrainer.j...@kippdata.de
wrote:
I can currently reproduce the following problem with 2.2.15 event MPM
under
high load:
When an
-Original Message-
From: William A. Rowe Jr. [mailto:wr...@rowe-clan.net]
Sent: Friday, March 05, 2010 5:59 PM
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: Fighting with build process 2.2.x on Sparc Solaris 10
What if -lm is placed after libapr[util]? Not sure what is
going on, but it
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 12:50 PM, Thomas, Peter ptho...@hpti.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: William A. Rowe Jr. [mailto:wr...@rowe-clan.net]
Sent: Friday, March 05, 2010 5:59 PM
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: Fighting with build process 2.2.x on Sparc Solaris 10
What if
On 21 Mar 2010, at 10:14 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
No-match of a wildcard must result in an error. If you are arguing
that httpd
should allow the admin to create conf/vhosts/*, only populated if
they are created,
then I'll counter that would be fine, just populate conf/vhosts/
On 3/23/2010 5:10 PM, Graham Leggett wrote:
On 21 Mar 2010, at 10:14 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
No-match of a wildcard must result in an error. If you are arguing
that httpd
should allow the admin to create conf/vhosts/*, only populated if they
are created,
then I'll counter that
On 24 Mar 2010, at 12:33 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
In the wild I see that pattern all the time, a configuration
directory
containing some equivalent of empty.conf, to work around this
limitation. Without this empty.conf file, you run the opposite risk -
someone removing the last config
11 matches
Mail list logo
