Hi list,
is anybody able to help me out with my issue? I hope
it's okay to bump my issue after being patient 5 days. :)
I tried to learn by example, tried to experiment and
searched Google meanwhile for some hints but
couldn't find any advice.
Even a hint into the right direction would be
On 04/30/2010 05:13 AM, Sander Temme wrote:
Crowd,
Since we have released our last release, how about we close the
Apache httpd-1.3 product in Bugzilla for entering new bugs? Say the
word and I'll click the clicky in the Bugzilla admin.
+1
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
I know in the *nix world that Apache forks different processes and in
Windows it is threaded. I was load testing my Windows Apache Module with 50
clients and it never started up a second process, though the thread count
did surpass the 50, it went to 53. I am assuming the other three threads
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Sam Carleton
scarle...@miltonstreet.com wrote:
I know in the *nix world that Apache forks different processes and in
Windows it is threaded. I was load testing my Windows Apache Module with 50
clients and it never started up a second process, though the thread
Dear Apache-Developer-List,
i have some stupid issues with my current configuration:
* fcgid 2.3.5
* Apache 2.2.15
* suEXEC
i started by point zero on an fresh unix-system (Gentoo Stage 3) and
compiled all sources by hand to get the newest codes for my new
server.
So, everything works find
On 5/3/2010 11:43 AM, Sam Carleton wrote:
Interesting, so what purpose does the parent process preform with MPM
winnt? Is it just legacy?
No, it's certainly not legacy. It's very easy to have a semistable or
unstable httpd process once you add in your efforts to hack custom perl
or c
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Michael Rack m...@michaelrack.de wrote:
Dear Apache-Developer-List,
i have some stupid issues with my current configuration:
us...@httpd.apache.org would be better (I'll fix the mod_fcgid
subproject page to clarify)
* fcgid 2.3.5
* Apache 2.2.15
* suEXEC
i
I was looking at
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48301
which asks for a way to distinguish in the log whether a connection was
aborted by the web server or the other end. To do that, we'd need to
note the cause of the abort in the connection structure.
I was hoping to just
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Dan Poirier poir...@pobox.com wrote:
I was looking at
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48301
which asks for a way to distinguish in the log whether a connection was
aborted by the web server or the other end. To do that, we'd need to
note
On 2010-05-03 at 14:23, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Dan Poirier poir...@pobox.com wrote:
I was looking at
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48301
which asks for a way to distinguish in the log whether a connection was
aborted by
Strange UPDATE (Please take a seat) ;-)
I have checkouted the SVN Trunk of mod_fcgid, compiled and installed.
Now there is a very strange behavior.
I still get the 500 Internal Sever Error, but suexec shows up the line
that the cgi was called and run with UID 2000/system.
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 3:51 PM, Michael Rack m...@michaelrack.de wrote:
Strange UPDATE (Please take a seat) ;-)
I have checkouted the SVN Trunk of mod_fcgid, compiled and installed.
Now there is a very strange behavior.
I still get the 500 Internal Sever Error, but suexec shows up the line
12 matches
Mail list logo
