On May 10, 2010, at 11:36 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> On 5/10/2010 1:28 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
>> Hi, all.
>> I found this document today stating the following:
>>Each developer is responsible for notifying the mailing list and
>> adding an action item to STATUS when they have an idea
On 5/11/2010 9:47 AM, Dan Poirier wrote:
>>
>> LuaHook AccessChecker funcname /path/to/script.lua
>
> I just thought of a problem - right now, the funcname is optional
> (defaults to "handle"). I hate having optional arguments that don't
> come at the end. I'd just as soon make it a required arg
On 2010-05-11 at 12:59, "Akins, Brian" wrote:
> The hook runner itself should just be in lua. Instead of scripts, you write
> lua modules. If a lua module has a function with the correct names (ie,
> same as hooks) it uses that:
>
> Ie in my module foo
>
> function fixups( r )
>
>
>
> W
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 20:12, Dan Poirier wrote:
> On 2010-05-11 at 12:55, HyperHacker wrote:
>> On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 08:47, Dan Poirier wrote:
>>> I just thought of a problem - right now, the funcname is optional
>>> (defaults to "handle"). I hate having optional arguments that don't
>>> c
On 2010-05-11 at 12:55, HyperHacker wrote:
> On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 08:47, Dan Poirier wrote:
>> I just thought of a problem - right now, the funcname is optional
>> (defaults to "handle"). I hate having optional arguments that don't
>> come at the end. I'd just as soon make it a required argu
Hi Stefan,
WRT Windows,
E:\build\httpd-2.2.x-dev\modules\filters\mod_reqtimeout.c(154) : error
C2065: 'core_module' : undeclared identifier
E:\build\httpd-2.2.x-dev\modules\filters\mod_reqtimeout.c(154) : error
C2223: left of '->module_index' must point to struct/union
Regards,
Gregg
s...
The hook runner itself should just be in lua. Instead of scripts, you write
lua modules. If a lua module has a function with the correct names (ie,
same as hooks) it uses that:
Ie in my module foo
function fixups( r )
Would get called at fixups, etc.
No need for a state per file, et
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 08:47, Dan Poirier wrote:
> On 2010-05-11 at 08:52, Dan Poirier wrote:
>
>> On 2010-05-10 at 16:03, "William A. Rowe Jr." wrote:
>>> On 5/10/2010 2:25 PM, Brian McCallister wrote:
> ...
>
> to
>
> LuaHook AccessChecker /path/to/script.lua funcname
>>>
On 2010-05-11 at 08:52, Dan Poirier wrote:
> On 2010-05-10 at 16:03, "William A. Rowe Jr." wrote:
>> On 5/10/2010 2:25 PM, Brian McCallister wrote:
...
to
LuaHook AccessChecker /path/to/script.lua funcname
LuaHook AuthChecker /path/to/script.lua funcname
Lu
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 06:52, Dan Poirier wrote:
> On 2010-05-10 at 16:03, "William A. Rowe Jr." wrote:
>> On 5/10/2010 2:25 PM, Brian McCallister wrote:
...
to
LuaHook AccessChecker /path/to/script.lua funcname
LuaHook AuthChecker /path/to/script.lua funcname
>
On 2010-05-10 at 16:03, "William A. Rowe Jr." wrote:
> On 5/10/2010 2:25 PM, Brian McCallister wrote:
>>> ...
>>>
>>> to
>>>
>>> LuaHook AccessChecker /path/to/script.lua funcname
>>> LuaHook AuthChecker /path/to/script.lua funcname
>>> LuaHook CheckUserID /path/to/script.lua funcname
>
> A
11 matches
Mail list logo