On 5 Jun 2010, at 03:18, Dennis J. wrote:
The nginx syntax may look C-like but it really isn't at all. For one thing
it's declarative and then you have all kinds of weird behaviors with
variables and control structures that make no sense if you're coming from
C-like angle.
I think what
On 04 Jun 2010, at 4:15 PM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:
cache implementation to be given the opportunity to cache a 206, if
Right, RFC2616 permits caching 206's.
What I have in mind is this below. mod_cache supports the caching of a
206, but mod_disk_cache chooses not to. Once
On 06/04/2010 05:09 PM, Graham Leggett wrote:
On 04 Jun 2010, at 4:15 PM, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:
IMHO it does not (at least according to the comments and the code
looks like
to follow these):
This is only present on trunk, and this needs to be fixed too. The
problem we saw was
On 04.06.2010 23:57, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Friday 04 June 2010, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
which are either pure bug fixes or pretty trivial. I will create a
new patch series without these soon, hopefully tomorrow.
The next iteration is at
http://people.apache.org/~sf/per-module-loglevel-v5/
