On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 08:03:51PM +0200, Rainer Jung wrote:
> On 27.09.2010 19:19, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> >On Monday 27 September 2010, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> >>>BTW, it is not that obvious that the shm is supposed to be
> >>>cleaned up and re-created on graceful restarts. This should be
> >>>do
On 27.09.2010 19:19, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Monday 27 September 2010, Jim Jagielski wrote:
BTW, it is not that obvious that the shm is supposed to be
cleaned up and re-created on graceful restarts. This should be
documented in the code.
That's an interesting point. I always assumed that i
On Sep 27, 2010, at 1:19 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> On Monday 27 September 2010, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>> BTW, it is not that obvious that the shm is supposed to be
>>> cleaned up and re-created on graceful restarts. This should be
>>> documented in the code.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> That's an interest
On Monday 27 September 2010, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> > BTW, it is not that obvious that the shm is supposed to be
> > cleaned up and re-created on graceful restarts. This should be
> > documented in the code.
> >
> >
>
> That's an interesting point. I always assumed that it should be,
> since one
On Monday 27 September 2010, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 10:34 AM, wrote:
> > Author: sf
> > Date: Mon Sep 27 14:34:29 2010
> > New Revision: 1001757
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1001757&view=rev
> > Log:
> > fix another null pointer dereference found by clang
>
On Sep 27, 2010, at 10:28 AM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> On Monday 27 September 2010, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> On Sep 27, 2010, at 9:19 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>> On Sep 27, 2010, at 8:17 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Let me look...
On Sep 26, 2010, at 12:13 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
>>>
On Sep 27, 2010, at 11:50 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
The testing I did was on a site with no .htaccess files. I did:
AllowOverride All
And, yes, I acknowledge that this is a stupid thing to do, and
specifically discouraged in the documentation. It was to prove a
point. :)
--
Rich Bowen
The testing I did was on a site with no .htaccess files. I did:
AllowOverride All
and that, all by itself (with no .htaccess files) dropped performance
by about 25 - 50%, depending on how deep in the directory tree I went.
I don't think I've ever done a 1.3/2.x comparison.
On Sep 27, 2
On 27 Sep 2010, at 4:02 PM, Igor Galić wrote:
[snip]
I am wondering however why there is a "use X instead of Y" meme
floating around, instead of the far more practical "offer X in
addition to Y". Let end users use X if they want to. X doesn't need
to
I guess through imprecise wording I jum
On Monday 27 September 2010, Rich Bowen wrote:
> As much as we dislike .htaccess files, they certainly seem to be
> a necessary evil. You can disable them (although not at compile
> time), but this is simply not an option for many folks. Educating
> them when it's better to use the main config th
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 10:34 AM, wrote:
> Author: sf
> Date: Mon Sep 27 14:34:29 2010
> New Revision: 1001757
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1001757&view=rev
> Log:
> fix another null pointer dereference found by clang
>
> Modified:
>httpd/httpd/trunk/modules/ssl/ssl_engine_vars.c
On Monday 27 September 2010, Graham Leggett wrote:
> .htaccess files are what they are, a way to configure the server
> at request time. For obvious reasons, with a server where the
> configuration is parsed on startup and then shared amongst all
> children processes using copy-on-write, any atte
On Monday 27 September 2010, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> On Sep 27, 2010, at 9:19 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> > On Sep 27, 2010, at 8:17 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> >> Let me look...
> >>
> >> On Sep 26, 2010, at 12:13 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> mod_slotmem_shm creates a new global
- "Rich Bowen" wrote:
> On Sep 27, 2010, at 7:44 AM, Igor Galić wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I remotely remember that we briefly touched this topic on IRC, but I'd
> really like to
> bring this to the lists attention:
>
> .htaccess is one of the features that have guaranteed httpd's
[snip]
> I am wondering however why there is a "use X instead of Y" meme
> floating around, instead of the far more practical "offer X in
> addition to Y". Let end users use X if they want to. X doesn't need to
I guess through imprecise wording I jumped the wrong theme here.
My intention was
On Sep 27, 2010, at 7:44 AM, Igor Galić wrote:
Hi folks,
I remotely remember that we briefly touched this topic on IRC, but
I'd really like to
bring this to the lists attention:
.htaccess is one of the features that have guaranteed httpd's
success in the past, and
at the same time it's
On 27 Sep 2010, at 1:44 PM, Igor Galić wrote:
I remotely remember that we briefly touched this topic on IRC, but
I'd really like to
bring this to the lists attention:
.htaccess is one of the features that have guaranteed httpd's
success in the past, and
at the same time it's the single bigg
On Sep 27, 2010, at 9:19 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> On Sep 27, 2010, at 8:17 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>> Let me look...
>> On Sep 26, 2010, at 12:13 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> mod_slotmem_shm creates a new global pool on every graceful restart
>>> but never destroys it.
On Sep 27, 2010, at 8:17 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Let me look...
> On Sep 26, 2010, at 12:13 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> mod_slotmem_shm creates a new global pool on every graceful restart
>> but never destroys it.
>>
>> From quickly looking at the code it is not clear to me wh
Let me look...
On Sep 26, 2010, at 12:13 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> mod_slotmem_shm creates a new global pool on every graceful restart
> but never destroys it.
>
> From quickly looking at the code it is not clear to me what the
> correct behaviour would be. Should the pool be created
Hi folks,
I remotely remember that we briefly touched this topic on IRC, but I'd really
like to
bring this to the lists attention:
.htaccess is one of the features that have guaranteed httpd's success in the
past, and
at the same time it's the single biggest clutch imaginable. It's a support
21 matches
Mail list logo
