On 10/25/2010 12:14 AM, s...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: sf
> Date: Sun Oct 24 22:14:15 2010
> New Revision: 1026906
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1026906&view=rev
> Log:
> Make sure to always log an error if loading of CA certificates fails
>
> PR: 40312
> Submitted by: Paul Tieman
On 10/22/2010 4:57 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Oct 2010 18:56:55 -0500
> "William A. Rowe Jr." wrote:
>
>> Extending this is fine; extending it indefinitely isn't :)
>>
>> How long would you like me to hold the vote open? Happy to oblige.
>
> OK, I'm not going to be in a position to vote a
On 23 Oct 2010, at 12:36, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> Since we won't be able to change the ap_expr syntax in any significant
> way after 2.4 has been released, we should try to do it right in 2.4.
+1. Thanks for opening this discussion.
> Therefore I suggest to replace it with something that is
On 10/23/2010 10:48 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am looking to improve per-request performance when you have an environment
> with many
> (thousands of) Location sections, and looking at ap_location_walk(), it looks
> like it is
> currently doing a simple linear search of locations
On Oct 23, 2010, at 6:08 PM, Sander Temme wrote:
> As part of ApacheCon in Atlanta, the HTTP Server Project will have a MeetUp.
> This MeetUp is freely accessible for all. If you're in Atlanta, whether for
> ApacheCon or because you live there, please join us to discuss the HTTP
> Server pro
On 24 Oct 2010, at 3:50 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
I am probably missing the obvious, but how do you intend to do the
hash lookup? Given that also matches the dir /
application, you may have to do N lookups for an url of length N.
Each location is parsed per whole directory, so the idea was
On Sun, 24 Oct 2010, Graham Leggett wrote:
I'm not keen to change the semantics at all, I'd rather like to speed up the
array lookup from the linear search we do now.
I went on a hunt for efficient string prefix matching algorithms, but that's
led me into some heavy computer science theory whe
Am 23.10.2010 22:24, schrieb Jeff Trawick:
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Graham Leggett wrote:
On 23 Oct 2010, at 9:51 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
@@ -325,7 +325,7 @@ struct proxy_worker {
apr_port_t port;
charkeepalive;
chardisablereuse;
-in
On 23 Oct 2010, at 1:36 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
Since we won't be able to change the ap_expr syntax in any significant
way after 2.4 has been released, we should try to do it right in 2.4.
Therefore I suggest to replace it with something that is closer to
ssl_expr. Initially, I thought it woul
On 23 Oct 2010, at 6:57 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
Nice idea if you can come up with a clean design.
We have a bit of a history of optimisation leading to breakage.
It might be easier if combined with revisiting the semantics of
subrequests and - especially - internal redirects. But that's going
to h
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
11 matches
Mail list logo
