On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 08:20:02PM -, s...@apache.org wrote:
Author: sf
Date: Thu Feb 3 20:20:02 2011
New Revision: 1066944
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1066944view=rev
Log:
Reload resolv.conf on graceful restarts
PR: 50619
Submitted by: Matt Miller m miller f5 com,
I have found that VS2010 release mode builds of Apache/mod_perl crash on
Windows Vista, Windows Server 2008 and Windows 7, and I believe that the
problem may be something to do with the environment manipulation done by
Apache (although Apache itself runs fine when not loading mod_perl).
The same
Hi RT maintainers,
Could you guys have new tickets opened in the libapreq2 queue send
notifications to apreq-...@httpd.apache.org to get wider visibility of
new issues?
Thanks,
Issac
I'm using Apache 2.2.17, mod_perl 2.0.4 and Perl 5.12.2 (patched as per
5.13.9 to allow building with VS2010). Apache/mod_perl crashes during
start-up, downstream from ap_run_open_logs():
Two anecdotes in this neighborhood that might feed into your experimenting:
Once upon a time I had to use
On Feb 4, 2011, at 4:03 AM, Joe Orton wrote:
On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 08:20:02PM -, s...@apache.org wrote:
Author: sf
Date: Thu Feb 3 20:20:02 2011
New Revision: 1066944
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1066944view=rev
Log:
Reload resolv.conf on graceful restarts
PR: 50619
On Feb 3, 2011, at 6:03 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 2/3/2011 5:01 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Thursday 03 February 2011, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Don't we also need to now start linking against lresolv??
/dev/httpd-git-trunk/srclib/apr-util/libaprutil-1.la -lexpat
-liconv
On 04 Feb 2011, at 3:50 PM, j...@apache.org wrote:
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1067178view=rev
Log:
And yet more balancer params that can be changed at runtime via
the b-m application...
next up, of course, is adding new workers ;)
If it became possible to add workers on the fly in
On Feb 4, 2011, at 10:29 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:
On 04 Feb 2011, at 3:50 PM, j...@apache.org wrote:
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1067178view=rev
Log:
And yet more balancer params that can be changed at runtime via
the b-m application...
next up, of course, is adding new
Thank you Tom for sharing your event MPM experience.
Can anyone speak to whether 2.2.17 event MPM (safely) supports SSL?
I suspect not, as only recently there was a trunk (2.3) fix to make the SSL
expression parser thread-safe.
Though this may be unrelated. If there's any doubts, we'll simply
Hi
I got two fundamental questions nobody over at users@apache could answer:
1. Will a module that I compiled using MinGW on Windows load in Apache
2.2.17 that was compiled with nmake?
2. Is there any chance of getting Apache to compile against MinGW on
Windows? Will this be an official goal of
-Original Message-
From: David Dabbs
Sent: Freitag, 4. Februar 2011 17:23
To: us...@httpd.apache.org
Cc: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: RE: [users@httpd] Event MPM in httpd 2.2.x
Thank you Tom for sharing your event MPM experience.
Can anyone speak to whether 2.2.17 event
On 04 Feb 2011, at 6:14 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Right now, the idea is for Apache to respond to simple GET requests,
ala
balancer-manager, to add workers. Of course, anything authorized
could
send those GET requests ;) ;)
We've finished zeroconf-ing one inhouse application we use, and
But ProxySet only allows you to set the same Variables as
ProxyPass does. host is none of them.
Indeed. This appears to be the problem. Such an option is missing.
Right now I'm looking into 2.2's source to see how to add an option
preservehost=(on|off).
Can you please test:
[Fri Feb 04 20:30:23 2011] [error] [client 192.168.43.1] Directory index
forbidden by Options directive: /var/www/
Frequent FAQ. How could this message be improved to help users
understand what's going on between Options and DirectoryIndex?
Directory listing forbidden by Options directive and
On 2/4/2011 4:51 AM, Steve Hay wrote:
The crash comes here (which is exactly where the Apache/mod_perl setup
was crashing):
msvcr100.dll!free(void * pBlock) Line 51 C
msvcr100.dll!__crtsetenv(char * * poption, const int primary)
Line 211 + 0xa bytes C
On 2/4/2011 7:20 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Feb 3, 2011, at 6:03 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 2/3/2011 5:01 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Thursday 03 February 2011, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Don't we also need to now start linking against lresolv??
On 2/4/2011 7:18 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Feb 4, 2011, at 4:03 AM, Joe Orton wrote:
On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 08:20:02PM -, s...@apache.org wrote:
Author: sf
Date: Thu Feb 3 20:20:02 2011
New Revision: 1066944
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1066944view=rev
Log:
Reload
On 2/4/2011 10:25 AM, Zeno Davatz wrote:
Hi
I got two fundamental questions nobody over at users@apache could answer:
1. Will a module that I compiled using MinGW on Windows load in Apache
2.2.17 that was compiled with nmake?
It aught to, against a 2.2.17 that uses msvcrt.dll - if it is
On Feb 4, 2011, at 1:42 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 2/4/2011 7:20 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Feb 3, 2011, at 6:03 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 2/3/2011 5:01 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Thursday 03 February 2011, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Don't we also need to now start linking
On Friday 04 February 2011, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 2/4/2011 7:18 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Feb 4, 2011, at 4:03 AM, Joe Orton wrote:
On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 08:20:02PM -, s...@apache.org wrote:
Author: sf
Date: Thu Feb 3 20:20:02 2011
New Revision: 1066944
URL:
On 2/4/2011 2:54 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
+1 here as well, if this is to be addressed at all, the portability
layer seems like the correct place to do it, if desired by the
app.
Would you prefer os/unix or APR? I am also happy to simply revert if
that is the majority opinion.
I suspect
On 2/4/2011 3:26 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Feb 4, 2011, at 4:14 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 2/4/2011 2:54 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
+1 here as well, if this is to be addressed at all, the portability
layer seems like the correct place to do it, if desired by the
app.
Would you
On Feb 4, 2011, at 4:29 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 2/4/2011 3:26 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Feb 4, 2011, at 4:14 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 2/4/2011 2:54 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
+1 here as well, if this is to be addressed at all, the portability
layer seems like the
William A. Rowe Jr. wrote on 2011-02-04:
On 2/4/2011 4:51 AM, Steve Hay wrote:
The crash comes here (which is exactly where the Apache/mod_perl setup
was crashing):
msvcr100.dll!free(void * pBlock) Line 51 C
msvcr100.dll!__crtsetenv(char * * poption, const int primary)
On 2/4/2011 3:49 PM, Steve Hay wrote:
Yes, Apache, Perl and mod_perl were all brand-new builds done one immediately
after another on the same machine, using the same VS2010 installation for
them all.
I presume by Apache you mean httpd as well as apr and apr-util, etc.
Also, note that the
Dear William
Thank you for the reply.
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 7:46 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
I got two fundamental questions nobody over at users@apache could answer:
1. Will a module that I compiled using MinGW on Windows load in Apache
2.2.17 that was compiled with
Hi Zeno,
Am 04.02.2011 23:58, schrieb Zeno Davatz:
I gave it a try (it took some time ;): These are the steps I took to
compile mod_ruby.so with MinGW-gcc.3.4.5 against Apache 2.2.17 on
Windows.
http://dev.ywesee.com/wiki.php/Apache/Libapr-1
The module finally compiles fine _but_ Apache does
On 2/4/2011 4:58 PM, Zeno Davatz wrote:
http://dev.ywesee.com/wiki.php/Apache/Libapr-1
The module finally compiles fine _but_ Apache does not start. Apaches
tells me that the Module can not be found. But the module is there and
it compiled fine. So something seems strange.
Provided that
William A. Rowe Jr. wrote on 2011-02-04:
On 2/4/2011 3:49 PM, Steve Hay wrote:
Yes, Apache, Perl and mod_perl were all brand-new builds done one
immediately after another on the same machine, using the same VS2010
installation for them all.
I presume by Apache you mean httpd as well as
29 matches
Mail list logo
