Hi lists,
Sorry for the noise and horrid manners, but I can't seem to find any
knowledgeable IPv6 people in my day-to-day life. I'm looking to pick
someone's brain about how to give access to the rest of the internet
to machines which natively only run an IPv6 stack and live in the global
IPv6
On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 3:24 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
Candidate binaries are available from http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ -
[+1] Release httpd 2.2.18 as GA
tested on Ubuntu 10.04 (32-bit)
source diffs with 2.2.17 look good
test diffs with 2.2.17 look good (worker
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 11:58 AM, j...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jim
Date: Mon May 9 15:58:10 2011
New Revision: 1101077
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1101077view=rev
Log:
Use AP_ instead of APR_ and move into the compile CPP
flags
Modified:
httpd/httpd/trunk/configure.in
On May 9, 2011, at 12:05 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
What is your thought on putting this in some private CPPFLAGS so that
third-party modules which create their own hooks aren't affected by
default?
Makes sense...
Looks good.. OSX and Fed14
+1
On May 8, 2011, at 3:24 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
Candidate binaries are available from http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ -
these do not yet constitute ASF releases. Win32 specific artifacts
(x86 binary distribution) will follow shortly; note that
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
On May 9, 2011, at 12:05 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
What is your thought on putting this in some private CPPFLAGS so that
third-party modules which create their own hooks aren't affected by
default?
Makes sense...
maybe
On May 9, 2011, at 12:53 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
On May 9, 2011, at 12:05 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
What is your thought on putting this in some private CPPFLAGS so that
third-party modules which create their own hooks
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
On May 9, 2011, at 12:53 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
On May 9, 2011, at 12:05 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
What is your thought on putting this in some
I'm hoping to TR tomorrow...
On May 9, 2011, at 1:15 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Sounds good... I was planning on doing a TR of 2.3.12 this week;
OK if we go with what's currently in place?
I wouldn't call it a showstopper.
When are you planning to TR?
I plan on doing a TR tomorrow...
On 5/8/2011 2:24 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
Candidate binaries are available from http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ -
these do not yet constitute ASF releases. Win32 specific artifacts
(x86 binary distribution) will follow shortly; note that -win32-src.zip
is generated from unix as a
On Sun, 2011-05-08 at 02:24 -0500, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
Candidate binaries are available from http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ -
these do not yet constitute ASF releases. Win32 specific artifacts
(x86 binary distribution) will follow shortly; note that -win32-src.zip
is generated from
On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 7:58 AM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
a potential concern is that by doing it that way (really, that's the
only way httpd can help out, whether the include of third-party code
is in ap_hooks.h or elsewhere) the provider of the probe macros is on
the hook to
On 5/9/2011 3:11 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 5/8/2011 2:24 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
Candidate binaries are available from http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ -
these do not yet constitute ASF releases. Win32 specific artifacts
(x86 binary distribution) will follow shortly; note that
14 matches
Mail list logo
