On 05/19/11 18:00, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 5/19/2011 12:46 PM, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
4) mark svn branch as r/o
FWIW, we left 1.3 svn r/w on httpd, if only to document any
security patches published long after 1.3 releases are over.
Thanks wrowe, thats the project I was trying
On 19 May 2011, at 1:06 PM, Yehezkel Horowitz wrote:
Can anyone explain why ap_regexec can take only NULL terminated
string?
I’m working in filter context and want to run regular expression on
bucket content (so I have the buffer length).
Currently I had to copy the bucket content and
I have a patch (based on 2.2.17) to where should I submit it?
From: Graham Leggett [mailto:minf...@sharp.fm]
Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2011 2:23 PM
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Cc: Anatoli Tubman; Ethan Schorer
Subject: Re: ap_regexec API for buffers (not NULL
On 19 May 2011, at 1:24 PM, Yehezkel Horowitz wrote:
I have a patch (based on 2.2.17) to where should I submit it?
Add it to bugzilla so it doesn't get lost, and then ping here, so
someone can pick it up.
Ideally, the patch should apply to httpd-trunk first, but having a
v2.2 patch also
Hi Graham
I have opened record #51231 in bugzilla (patch attached to the record).
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51231
Thanks
Yehezkel
From: Graham Leggett [mailto:minf...@sharp.fm]
Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2011 2:33 PM
To:
I will reroll the dependency tarball, once the apr/apu
vote passes... Once that happens I'll allow for 24 hrs
for comments/issues on that tarball and then release/announce.
On 19 May 2011, at 12:22, Graham Leggett wrote:
On 19 May 2011, at 1:06 PM, Yehezkel Horowitz wrote:
Can anyone explain why ap_regexec can take only NULL terminated string?
Presumably because that's what PCRE supports!
Sounds like a sensible thing to have.
Indeed, I could certainly use
Hi Nick
As I mentioned in my original mail, PCRE DO support getting the length as
argument!
Please take a short look at ap_regexec implementation (util_pcre.c file) and
you will see that current code pass PCRE the length (which is obtained with
strlen).
So it is just change in HTTPD wrapping
On 19 May 2011, at 15:27, Nick Kew wrote:
Presumably because that's what PCRE supports!
Aaargh! Ignore that. Saw your post and read it as regcomp.
The suggestion is totally sensible as well as trivial. Thank you.
--
Nick Kew
Available for work, contract or permanent
On 5/19/2011 8:45 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
I will reroll the dependency tarball, once the apr/apu
vote passes... Once that happens I'll allow for 24 hrs
for comments/issues on that tarball and then release/announce.
+1
Once apr/apu votes are in process, I will roll 2.2.19. Allowing
24 hours
[Resending from correct address]
Eric, do you have a moment to look at the httpd issues below, while
this is all fresh on you mind?
On 5/19/2011 11:07 AM, olli hauer wrote:
On 2011-05-19 14:08, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 2:53 PM, olli hauer oha...@gmx.de wrote:
On 2011-05-18
New releases are in progress for each of these projects and are
expected to be available in the coming days. The upcoming httpd
2.2.19 will bundle new releases of apr and apr-util which correct
the regressions described below. An announcement of these releases
will be broadcast.
Note: httpd
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 12:23 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
[Resending from correct address]
Eric, do you have a moment to look at the httpd issues below, while
this is all fresh on you mind?
On 5/19/2011 11:07 AM, olli hauer wrote:
On 2011-05-19 14:08, Jeff Trawick
Okay so this is the second time this passed. What do we need to do to
make this actually happen ?
1) HEADS up e-mail to announce lists, dev list
2) update website
3) update /dist and move to archive
4) mark svn branch as r/o
drink beer.
On 05/18/11 17:12, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
We
On 5/19/2011 12:42 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
This seems to be what we undid here (queued up for 2.2.19) :
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=1124515
Yes, of course. Sorry, I read through it too quickly and thought
it was an internal build failure of either 2.2.18 or 2.2.x
15 matches
Mail list logo
