On 6/29/2011 5:09 PM, NormW wrote:
> Obviously don't speak for the official NetWare devs but for my mind LDAP on a
> web server
> ought to be an optional component if the builder has no need of it. If it was
> 'obligatory'
> there hardly seems any need for a AP_HAS_LDAP flag at all. (Much like h
On 30/06/2011 7:43 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 6/29/2011 4:35 PM, NormW wrote:
One point of query is the inclusion of:
/* this will be defined if LDAP support was . */
#define AP_HAS_LDAP 1
in both ap_ldap.hw and ap_ldap.hnw since (to my logic) AP_HAS_LDAP is a
compile-
On 6/29/2011 4:35 PM, NormW wrote:
>
> One point of query is the inclusion of:
>
>> /* this will be defined if LDAP support was . */
>> #define AP_HAS_LDAP 1
>
> in both ap_ldap.hw and ap_ldap.hnw since (to my logic) AP_HAS_LDAP is a
> compile-time
> option that ought to omit all
On 30/06/2011 5:31 AM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Wednesday 29 June 2011, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
This doesn't build for me because LDAP_DECLARE is not defined for
Fixed in r1141201, more testers welcome.
For 2.3.13, my vote is -1. With r1141201, it would have been +1.
But I think it may be good
On windows it builds with GUI, ingnored the known ldap errors.
Started httpd.exe in a command window with the shipped httpd.conf.
It is over and over starting, only sign is:
Wed Jun 29 17:12:34.932000 2011] [mpm_winnt:notice] [pid 2812:tid 1920]
Child: Starting 64 worker threads.
[Wed Jun 29 1
On Wednesday 29 June 2011, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> This doesn't build for me because LDAP_DECLARE is not defined for
Fixed in r1141201, more testers welcome.
For 2.3.13, my vote is -1. With r1141201, it would have been +1.
But I think it may be good if one Windows and one Netware person could
t
On Tuesday 28 June 2011, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> The candidate tarballs for 2.3.13 are now available at:
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> I'm opening up a vote to release these as 2.3.13-beta, with
> a hope to push on for a quick GA after maybe another beta
> release in the near fut
* Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Jim Jagielski
> > Sent: Mittwoch, 29. Juni 2011 17:39
> > To: dev@httpd.apache.org
> > Cc: d...@httpd.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: svn:externals for docs build
> >
> > On Jun 29, 2011, at 11:00 AM, André Malo wrote:
> > > On
Don't open this. rt36 doesn't have it, you need to keep it until that
port is removed.
On 06/29/11 01:13, Steve Wills wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 06/28/11 19:55, Olli Hauer wrote:
>>
>> Hi Steve,
>>
>> from my perspective everything is fine for the change.
>>
>
>
>
> I find 98M in a clean checkout. (69M of that belong to the docs already).
Wow. I had no idea the docs were that much of it.
>
> maybe we should move out the docs entirely
-1
Putting any extra obstacles in front of anyone writing a doc is unwise.
I don't honestly think anyone minds
> > On Jun 29, 2011, at 11:00 AM, André Malo wrote:
> >
> > > On Wednesday 29 June 2011 16:47:16 Rich Bowen wrote:
> > >> On Jun 29, 2011, at 10:43 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
> > >>> [rbowen@Rocinante:apache/httpd-trunk]$ du -ksh ./
> >
> > >>>
> > >>> (06-29 10:39) 249M ./
> > >>
> > >> Oops. 'ma
> -Original Message-
> From: Jim Jagielski
> Sent: Mittwoch, 29. Juni 2011 17:39
> To: dev@httpd.apache.org
> Cc: d...@httpd.apache.org
> Subject: Re: svn:externals for docs build
>
>
> On Jun 29, 2011, at 11:00 AM, André Malo wrote:
>
> > On Wednesday 29 June 2011 16:47:16 Rich Bowe
On Jun 29, 2011, at 11:00 AM, André Malo wrote:
> On Wednesday 29 June 2011 16:47:16 Rich Bowen wrote:
>> On Jun 29, 2011, at 10:43 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
>>> [rbowen@Rocinante:apache/httpd-trunk]$ du -ksh ./
>>>
>>> (06-29 10:39) 249M ./
>>
>> Oops. 'make distclean' dro
On Wednesday 29 June 2011 16:47:16 Rich Bowen wrote:
> On Jun 29, 2011, at 10:43 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
> > [rbowen@Rocinante:apache/httpd-trunk]$ du -ksh ./
> >
> > (06-29 10:39) 249M ./
>
> Oops. 'make di
On Jun 29, 2011, at 10:43 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
> [rbowen@Rocinante:apache/httpd-trunk]$ du -ksh ./
> (06-29 10:39)
> 249M ./
Oops. 'make distclean' dropped about 40M off of that. But, still, I think i
On Jun 29, 2011, at 10:30 AM, André Malo wrote:
> On Wednesday 29 June 2011 15:39:32 Igor Galić wrote:
>>> Hey guys,
>>>
>>> I would like to add an svn:externals for
>>> docs/manual/build in trunk - any concerns?
>
> There was a lot of discussion about that in the past (about once every year,
On Wednesday 29 June 2011 15:39:32 Igor Galić wrote:
> > Hey guys,
> >
> > I would like to add an svn:externals for
> > docs/manual/build in trunk - any concerns?
There was a lot of discussion about that in the past (about once every year, I
think). I don't have a strong opinion about either way,
Forgot to include docs@
>
> Hey guys,
>
> I would like to add an svn:externals for
> docs/manual/build in trunk - any concerns?
>
--
Igor Galić
Tel: +43 (0) 664 886 22 883
Mail: i.ga...@brainsware.org
URL: http://brainsware.org/
Hey guys,
I would like to add an svn:externals for
docs/manual/build in trunk - any concerns?
--
Igor Galić
Tel: +43 (0) 664 886 22 883
Mail: i.ga...@brainsware.org
URL: http://brainsware.org/
19 matches
Mail list logo
