Re: [PATCH 51489] ProxyPassReverse issue + patch

2011-07-11 Thread Micha Lenk
Hi Jim, Am 10.07.2011 16:57, schrieb Jim Jagielski: Try: Proxy balancer://196f045aca6adc82a0b6eea93ed286a1/ Thank you for your hint. I tried that, but it doesn't change anything. :( Micha

Re: [PATCH 51489] ProxyPassReverse issue + patch

2011-07-11 Thread Micha Lenk
Hi Nick, On 9 Jul 2011, at 11:16, Nick Kew wrote: On 8 Jul 2011, at 17:29, Micha Lenk wrote: I'm using Apache as a reverse proxy in a simple load balancer setup. I use ProxyPassReverse in order to re-write the backend server name in HTTP redirections (ie. in the Location header of the HTTP

Proxy authentication

2011-07-11 Thread Petr Hracek
Dear users, I have problems with proxy authorization and I could not image where is a problem. Configuration in my VirtualHost section is: VirtualHost _default_:443 SSLEngine on SSLProxyEngine on ProxyRequests off RewriteEngine on RewriteCond %{REQUEST_METHOD} ^TRACE RewriteMap pages

Re: [vote] mod_ldap

2011-07-11 Thread Stefan Fritsch
On Monday 11 July 2011, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: On 7/10/2011 5:34 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote: Regardless of anyone else's opinion, the addition or deletion of a new API to our product is a technical change that can be vetoed. Likewise, the API being an incomplete abstraction that isn't

Re: [vote] mod_ldap

2011-07-11 Thread Rainer Jung
On 12.07.2011 00:35, Stefan Fritsch wrote: On Monday 11 July 2011, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: On 7/10/2011 5:34 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote: Especially r1142938 needs checking, I think I may have accidentally reverted some bits from that when resolving some conflicts. I can check and reapply

Re: [vote] mod_ldap

2011-07-11 Thread William A. Rowe Jr.
On 7/11/2011 5:35 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote: On Monday 11 July 2011, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: On 7/10/2011 5:34 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote: Regardless of anyone else's opinion, the addition or deletion of a new API to our product is a technical change that can be vetoed. Likewise, the API