Dear all,
I am an experienced C programmer and would like to write a module for Apache
platform to
accomplish following requirements:
- receiving raw TCP traffic destined from connected clients.
- retain the connections established for a long time.
- process incomming TCP traffic based on
On 28 Nov 2011, at 07:58, Reza Shadmani wrote:
Give me a clue where to start... I kindly please to receive your hints and
experience in this matter.
What you describe is a protocol module. There are a few examples available:
mod_ftpd is probably the most mature at apache.org implementing
Hi,
apr_shm_baseaddr_get returns the base address for the shared memory
segment. You will have to implement your own allocator within the shared
memory. Also keep in mind that you can't reliably use pointers inside the
shared memory segment, because - as the documentation states - the
Hi, is there any example mod_slotmem codes that we can understand the
usage? Or could you give me an usage example? For example we are using
apr_shm_create() in post_config, but mod_slotmem is a little bit hard to
understand i think.
And i want to ask a question,
is it a problem to create
typedef
- Original Message -
On 11/27/2011 6:56 PM, Gregg L. Smith wrote:
No, I looked it up after, it's one of the Swiss fonts from MS
Office, couldn't grab back
the mail.
It looks pretty '90's style now... maybe a bump up to some
more modern face?
Oh well, the last two or three
Am 27.11.2011 18:14, schrieb Stefan Fritsch:
Yes, that would be a good idea and I agree with Daniel that we should
use a distinct prefix or format. We currently have around 2700 calls
to *_log_?error in trunk, so a 4-digit number should be ok. Together
with for example AH as prefix for Apache
It would be great if we had the orig's somewhere... Long ago I
did the ASF logo so let me look around to see if I can find
the orig Powered By logo.
PS: Can we *please* drop gifs? :)
On Nov 27, 2011, at 4:50 AM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
Hi,
docs/icons/apache_pb2* contain the version number
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 04:53:46PM +0100, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:
One comment though: Shouldn't we check r-unparsed_uri as well (at least
in the proxy case, as it may be used by ap_proxy_trans_match instead of
r-uri)?
Thanks for looking at this!
I'm not sure how we could check
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 11:37:34PM +0100, Rainer Jung wrote:
Don't know whether that could happen here, but could OPTIONS * be
a problem?
Hmmm, another good question.
What should mod_rewrite or mod_proxy's translate_name hook do for a
request-URI of *? 2616 says:
The asterisk *
On Monday 28 November 2011, Nick Kew wrote:
On 28 Nov 2011, at 00:37, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
Hi,
while browsing a bit through Michael Zalewski's new Tangled Web
book, I was reminded again that we are very forgiving about what
we accept as a request. Is this really a good idea in the
On Sunday 13 November 2011, Nick Kew wrote:
Indeed, checking those return values would be better. May have
been lost when I separated out the i18n code from its origins in
markup filtering.
I have added some error checks and a few ap_asserts(). Do you want to
review it before I merge it into
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 17:31:59 +0100
Stefan Fritsch s...@sfritsch.de wrote:
On Sunday 13 November 2011, Nick Kew wrote:
Indeed, checking those return values would be better. May have
been lost when I separated out the i18n code from its origins in
markup filtering.
I have added some
- Original Message -
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 17:31:59 +0100
Stefan Fritsch s...@sfritsch.de wrote:
On Sunday 13 November 2011, Nick Kew wrote:
Indeed, checking those return values would be better. May have
been lost when I separated out the i18n code from its origins in
markup
On 27.11.2011 12:14, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
Yes, that would be a good idea and I agree with Daniel that we should
use a distinct prefix or format. We currently have around 2700 calls
to *_log_?error in trunk, so a 4-digit number should be ok. Together
with for example AH as prefix for Apache
mod_fcgid has serious long standing bugs which are reported in
bugzilla, see 51020, 50309 and 48949 .
Please look at it.
mod_fcgid has serious long standing bugs which are reported in
bugzilla, see 51020, 50309 and 48949 .
Please look at it.
On 28 Nov 2011, at 00:37, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
* With 'ProxyRequests off', we accept absolute urls like http://hostname/path
for local requests, but we don't check that the hostname contained in it
actually matches the Host header if there is one. The hostname from the URI
is then used
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 7:24 PM, minf...@apache.org wrote:
Author: minfrin
Date: Tue Nov 29 00:24:35 2011
New Revision: 1207721
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1207721view=rev
Log:
RPM: The default httpd mpm is now worker instead of prefork.
FWIW
* a normal build defaults to event
On 29 Nov 2011, at 02:37, Jeff Trawick wrote:
FWIW
* a normal build defaults to event
* a multi-MPM build of 2.4 should build the MPMs as DSOs
+1.
This is what I'm trying to nail down - to get the packaging to work against the
ideal installation of httpd.
What I am also keen to do is
On 23.11.2011 15:06, Joe Orton wrote:
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 08:37:31AM +0100, Kaspar Brand wrote:
There are two approaches to fix 1): a) turn off verify_hostname
where needed (t/ssl/pr12355.t and t/ssl/pr43738.t are doing this
right now) or b) specify the CA cert (generated in t/conf/ca/...)
20 matches
Mail list logo
