Those requests are no longer processed (status is _). The seconds since
is the time since this request was last processed, the column after that
shows how long processing took (here: 1 millisecond for each of them).
There are also with status L, for example for almost a day sitting there:
0-0
On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 06:08:53PM -0600, William Rowe wrote:
I suspect a single doc for mod_socache would probably be appropriate.
The API docs are in a single doc, ap_socache.h. They are marked up
using doxy syntax, if we want that in HTML can't we do that
automagically using doxygen?
On 03 Dec 2011, at 1:48 AM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
where are we WRT 2.4?
Blockers:
mod_proxy_scgi.c needs to be fixed for compilation with C89 (easy)
The only blocker left in STATUS is this:
* Modules that are not ready for production use must be removed.
The same for modules
On 06.12.2011 11:56, Steffen wrote:
Those requests are no longer processed (status is _). The seconds
since is the time since this request was last processed, the column
after that shows how long processing took (here: 1 millisecond for
each of them).
There are also with status L, for example
Update: that one with a L is gone after ~33 hours
-Original Message-
From: Rainer Jung
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2011 9:33 PM
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: Win 2.3.15 :: Server Status Entries
On 06.12.2011 11:56, Steffen wrote:
Those requests are no longer processed
- Original Message -
On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 06:08:53PM -0600, William Rowe wrote:
I suspect a single doc for mod_socache would probably be
appropriate.
The API docs are in a single doc, ap_socache.h. They are marked up
using doxy syntax, if we want that in HTML can't we do that
On 12/6/2011 8:01 AM, Joe Orton wrote:
On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 06:08:53PM -0600, William Rowe wrote:
I suspect a single doc for mod_socache would probably be appropriate.
The API docs are in a single doc, ap_socache.h. They are marked up
using doxy syntax, if we want that in HTML can't we
