How does the week of April 2nd sound? This should provide enough time
for the proposed backports to get enough votes and to propose
the backports based on recent trunk improvements...
Sound like a plan? I volunteer to RM.
On Mar 14, 2012, at 3:36 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
In the attempts to
On 25.03.2012 19:09, Jim Jagielski wrote:
How does the week of April 2nd sound? This should provide enough time
for the proposed backports to get enough votes and to propose
the backports based on recent trunk improvements...
Sound like a plan? I volunteer to RM.
On Mar 14, 2012, at 3:36 PM,
On 25 Mar 2012, at 7:09 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
How does the week of April 2nd sound? This should provide enough time
for the proposed backports to get enough votes and to propose
the backports based on recent trunk improvements...
Sound like a plan? I volunteer to RM.
+1.
I've just
I have been trying to build trunk from trunk versions of apr and
apr-util. buildconf complains about not being able to find APR-util (or
apr-UTIL). In any case, caps are involved. Windows might not complain, but
UNIX does.
To test what you are testing - should I use apr and apr-util trunks, or is
On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 6:18 PM, Michael Felt mamf...@gmail.com wrote:
I have been trying to build trunk from trunk versions of apr and apr-util.
buildconf complains about not being able to find APR-util (or apr-UTIL). In
any case, caps are involved. Windows might not complain, but UNIX does.
On 26 Mar 2012, at 12:18 AM, Michael Felt wrote:
I have been trying to build trunk from trunk versions of apr and apr-util.
buildconf complains about not being able to find APR-util (or apr-UTIL). In
any case, caps are involved. Windows might not complain, but UNIX does.
In theory, you
Hi Michael,
Am 21.03.2012 19:45, schrieb Michael Felt:
Unfortunately - 2.4.2 is a nogo...
here's the 2.4.x patch I've just proposed for backport:
http://people.apache.org/~fuankg/diffs/mpm_dso_exports.diff
Gün.
