Am 01.05.2012 03:32, schrieb William A. Rowe Jr.:
On 4/29/2012 6:25 PM, Guenter Knauf wrote:
Am 29.04.2012 22:59, schrieb Eric Covener:
AFAICT AIX/libtool uses export files generated during the build, but
does not use the checked in ones.
well, thats the point: if those in svn were used then
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 9:50 AM, Guenter Knauf fua...@apache.org wrote:
Am 01.05.2012 03:32, schrieb William A. Rowe Jr.:
On 4/29/2012 6:25 PM, Guenter Knauf wrote:
Am 29.04.2012 22:59, schrieb Eric Covener:
AFAICT AIX/libtool uses export files generated during the build, but
does not use
I hope many of you already saw this and might be considering attending
to present whatever short topics you would like during the BarCamp about
our projects!
I'd asked and there is no plan -yet- for any Hackathon activity, but Tim
indicated it might be able to happen. Would anyone be up for a
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 2:00 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@apache.org wrote:
I hope many of you already saw this and might be considering attending
to present whatever short topics you would like during the BarCamp about
our projects!
I'd asked and there is no plan -yet- for any Hackathon
Let me look into that... iirc, it was due to us wanting to
be able to persist data between restarts and using the time
as part of the id prevented that. But I could be mis-remembering.
On Apr 30, 2012, at 7:50 AM, Zisis Lianas wrote:
hi,
when mod_proxy currently is generating his id, the
Hi Eric,
Am 01.05.2012 16:30, schrieb Eric Covener:
Even 2.0 seems to just generate libmod_foo.exp then pass the generated
file to the linker, but I wouldn't go out of your way removing them
from 2.0 and 2.2 if they aren't bothering anyone.
hmmm, so you say axe from 2.4.x/HEAD but keep ìn 2.2.x
On OS X 10.7, gcc 4.2.1, with apr-1.4.5 and apr-util 1.4.1, I
encounter the following error attempting to build httpd 2.4.2. I
didn't see any architecture specific code in
srclib/apr/include/apr_file_info.h. Any thoughts?
./configure --prefix=/Users/phred/dev/httpd24 --enable-so
