Dear all
i've got a strange behaviour in my custom module:
it seems that if the set filename overlaps the requested uri ths final
uri passed to mod_proxy is wrong, or has some added strange
characters.
some information:
* the module is activated only when the requested uri contains the
string
2012/8/21 Sorin Manolache sor...@gmail.com:
On 2012-08-21 13:39, nik600 wrote:
Replace with
apr_pcalloc(r-pool, strlen(newurl) + 1);
in order to allocate space for the closing '\0'.
Oh, i'm stupid...thanks
--
/*/
nik600
http://www.kumbe.it
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:38:14AM +0200, Guenter Knauf wrote:
Hi Joe,
your commit is missing a log number ...
mod_proxy_connect.c
.\mod_proxy_connect.c(257) : warning C4003: not enough actual
parameters for macro 'APLOGNO'
Damn, sorry about that Guenter, does this break the build for you?
Hi Joe,
Am 21.08.2012 09:32, schrieb Joe Orton:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:38:14AM +0200, Guenter Knauf wrote:
your commit is missing a log number ...
mod_proxy_connect.c
.\mod_proxy_connect.c(257) : warning C4003: not enough actual
parameters for macro 'APLOGNO'
Damn, sorry about that
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 09:00:00AM +0200, Kaspar Brand wrote:
On 17.8.12 13:59, jor...@apache.org wrote:
@@ -1412,6 +1421,8 @@ static void ssl_init_proxy_certs(server_
ssl_die(s);
}
+/* ### Why is all the following done? Why is it necessary or
+ * useful for
Apache HTTP Server 2.4.3 Released
The Apache Software Foundation and the Apache HTTP Server Project
are pleased to announce the release of version 2.4.3 of the Apache
HTTP Server (Apache). This version of Apache is our 3rd GA
release of the new generation 2.4.x branch of
On 2012-08-21 13:39, nik600 wrote:
static int kcache_handler_translate(request_rec* r)
{
if (r-method_number != M_GET r-method_number != M_POST){
return HTTP_METHOD_NOT_ALLOWED;
}
if(
strstr(r-unparsed_uri, /files/anteprima)==NULL){
A possible subtle bug with httpd-2.4.3 on Windows (Server 2008 R2) was found
in the following source file, which was compiled using VS2010:
httpd-2.4.3/server/config.c
// line 602:
ap_module_short_names[m-module_index] = strdup(sym_name);
// line 680:
I don't think a source code change should be required.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-US/library/we1whae7(v=vs.80)
When the application is linked with a debug version of the C run-time
libraries, free resolves to _free_dbg. For more information about how
the heap is managed during the debugging
The cited documentation seems to apply only to Windows Server 2003?
As I've tested, free() didn't seem to resolve to _free_dbg on Windows Server
2008 + VS2010, or on Windows Server 2012 + VS2012.
The installed httpd-2.4.3 binaries just can not run if the code is not
changed. So please verify why
On 21.08.2012 16:22, PKU-bswen wrote:
The cited documentation seems to apply only to Windows Server 2003?
Unfortunately I can't easily check myself, but the documentation states
the automatic chosing of the debug variants also for VS 2012:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/z8h19c37
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 10:50 AM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
On 21.08.2012 16:22, PKU-bswen wrote:
The cited documentation seems to apply only to Windows Server 2003?
Unfortunately I can't easily check myself, but the documentation states the
automatic chosing of the debug
Now that 2.4.3 is released and annouced I'm in the process of updating
the security page (the xml file with the known vulnerabilities) to
include the two issues that are in CHANGES.
The XSS mod_negotitation issues I think is clearly of severity level 4
(low), but I'm a bit uncertain about the
See subject.
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 11:30 AM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
Now that 2.4.3 is released and annouced I'm in the process of updating the
security page (the xml file with the known vulnerabilities) to include the
two issues that are in CHANGES.
The XSS mod_negotitation issues I
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Trawick [mailto:]
Sent: Dienstag, 21. August 2012 17:37
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: Updating 2.4 security page
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 11:30 AM, Rainer Jung
wrote:
Now that 2.4.3 is released and annouced I'm in the process of updating
Jeff Trawick wrote:
what about limiting the number of characters logged and potentially
sent to the client via error-notes?
(%.120s anyone?)
Sounds good to me ... are there any debug/trace log which truncate
output in a similar way that could serve as best practices examples?
I fished
Done.
On 21.08.2012 17:41, Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Trawick [mailto:]
Sent: Dienstag, 21. August 2012 17:37
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: Updating 2.4 security page
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 11:30 AM, Rainer Jung
wrote:
Now that 2.4.3
Hi,
I just noted that http://httpd.apache.org/download.cgi#apache24 has been
updated, but *not* the main page (http://httpd.apache.org)
Best regards.
Le 21/08/2012 13:55, Jim Jagielski a écrit :
Apache HTTP Server 2.4.3 Released
Le 21/08/2012 20:40, Christophe JAILLET a écrit :
Hi,
I just noted that http://httpd.apache.org/download.cgi#apache24 has
been updated, but *not* the main page (http://httpd.apache.org)
Best regards.
Le 21/08/2012 13:55, Jim Jagielski a écrit :
Apache HTTP Server 2.4.3
On 21 Aug 2012, Jim Jagielski wrote:
NOTE to Windows users: The issues with AcceptFilter None replacing
Win32DisableAcceptEx appears to have resolved starting with version 2.4.3
make Apache httpd 2.4.x suitable for Windows servers.
I know what this means, but the grammar doesn't seem very
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Tim Bannister is...@jellybaby.net wrote:
On 21 Aug 2012, Jim Jagielski wrote:
NOTE to Windows users: The issues with AcceptFilter None replacing
Win32DisableAcceptEx appears to have resolved starting with version 2.4.3
make Apache httpd 2.4.x suitable for
Candidate binaries are available from http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ -
these do not yet constitute ASF releases. Win32 specific artifacts
(x86 binary distribution and -win32-src.zip) will follow sometime later
this evening.
Feedback and edits to the draft announcement are greatly appreciated,
From reading the module's documentation
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/mod/mod_dbd.html, it seems, a single vhost
can only use one DB-server (and only with one set of credentials): only a single
DBDriver and DBDParams is possible, for example.
Also, the syntax of mod_rewrite's dbd/fastdbd
24 matches
Mail list logo
