Hello,
A new module has been created and is awaiting approval. If you are a
modules.apache.org administrator,
please check whether this module passes the requirements of an httpd module and
approve it if so.
Author: sierkb
Module name: mod_tidy
Tags:filters
License: Apache
Hi,
I have a C++ filter module written for Apache.
I see that all URL's sent to Apache server are encoded. Does Apache already
do the URL decoding and store it somewhere in the request_rec structure OR
the filter module should explicitly do a URL decoding?
If the filter should do the URL
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 9:01 AM, Sindhi Sindhi sindhi@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have a C++ filter module written for Apache.
I see that all URL's sent to Apache server are encoded. Does Apache already
do the URL decoding and store it somewhere in the request_rec structure OR
the filter
On Wednesday 12 June 2013 21:18:05 Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Tuesday 11 June 2013, André Malo wrote:
trunk patch: http://svn.apache.org/r1491155
2.4.x patch: trunk patch works
nd: why would you do that in a stable branch?
+ sf: Because it is only annoying
On 14.06.2013 16:41, André Malo wrote:
On Wednesday 12 June 2013 21:18:05 Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Tuesday 11 June 2013, André Malo wrote:
trunk patch: http://svn.apache.org/r1491155
2.4.x patch: trunk patch works
nd: why would you do that in a stable branch?
+ sf:
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 10:41 AM, André Malo n...@perlig.de wrote:
On Wednesday 12 June 2013 21:18:05 Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Tuesday 11 June 2013, André Malo wrote:
trunk patch: http://svn.apache.org/r1491155
2.4.x patch: trunk patch works
nd: why would you do
On Friday 14 June 2013 17:34:26 Rainer Jung wrote:
On 14.06.2013 16:41, André Malo wrote:
On Wednesday 12 June 2013 21:18:05 Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Tuesday 11 June 2013, André Malo wrote:
trunk patch: http://svn.apache.org/r1491155
2.4.x patch: trunk patch works
On Jun 14, 2013 11:36 AM, Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 10:41 AM, André Malo n...@perlig.de wrote:
On Wednesday 12 June 2013 21:18:05 Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Tuesday 11 June 2013, André Malo wrote:
trunk patch: http://svn.apache.org/r1491155
On 14.06.2013 17:44, André Malo wrote:
On Friday 14 June 2013 17:34:26 Rainer Jung wrote:
On 14.06.2013 16:41, André Malo wrote:
On Wednesday 12 June 2013 21:18:05 Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Tuesday 11 June 2013, André Malo wrote:
trunk patch: http://svn.apache.org/r1491155
2.4.x
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Rainer Jung []
Gesendet: Freitag, 14. Juni 2013 18:08
An: dev@httpd.apache.org
Betreff: Re: svn commit: r1491612 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
We do cosmetical changes in stable branches like e.g. reducing code
drift between trunk and 2.4 or
On Jun 14, 2013, at 11:44 AM, André Malo n...@perlig.de wrote:
I agree, that the block should simply die. However, I question the value of
doing cosmetical changes in our stable branches (which is the justification
in STATUS).
FWIW, I agree. I don't mind such clean-ups and cosmetic
On Jun 14, 2013, at 12:07 PM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
We do cosmetical changes in stable branches like e.g. reducing code
drift between trunk and 2.4 or fixing typos in comments.
Of course. That's not the question (at least IMO). The question
is that when a cosmetic
Of course. That's not the question (at least IMO). The question
is that when a cosmetic change also results in a functional
change (and we wouldn't be suggesting MMN bumps if it wasn't),
that it becomes a change that should be proposed as a backport
and not willy-nilly added. We have a
On Jun 14, 2013, at 1:20 PM, Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com wrote:
Of course. That's not the question (at least IMO). The question
is that when a cosmetic change also results in a functional
change (and we wouldn't be suggesting MMN bumps if it wasn't),
that it becomes a change that should
Dear Apache developers!
I want to understand where is configured the library used by
Apache httpd server for the ldap_search_ext_s implementation.
I looked at util_ldap.c:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/modules/ldap/util_ldap.c?view=markup
result =
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Michael Furman
michael_fur...@hotmail.com wrote:
Dear Apache developers!
I want to understand where is configured the library used by Apache httpd
server for the ldap_search_ext_s implementation.
I looked at util_ldap.c:
Thank you for your reply!
I have found the following:
ldd /usr/lib64/apr-util-1/apr_ldap-1.so
…
libldap-2.4.so.2
= /lib64/libldap-2.4.so.2 (0x7f337a64d000)
…
and the following:
rpm -ql openldap | grep .so
...
/lib64/libldap-2.4.so.2
/lib64/libldap-2.4.so.2.5.6
...
I did not find anything related to /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf.
Should I add libldap-2.4.so.2 or apr_ldap-1.so to the file if I want to use
OpenLdap?
I suggest taking the question to us...@httpd.apache.org
On Thursday 13 June 2013, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
On Jun 12, 2013, at 12:34 PM, s...@apache.org wrote:
Author: sf
Date: Wed Jun 12 19:34:19 2013
New Revision: 1492395
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1492395
Log:
Actually use the secret when generating nonces.
This change may cause
On Friday 14 June 2013, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
Using a global pointer to an allocated pool variable is
not even remotely safe when that pool gets deallocated.
And a routine that gets called within .htaccess files is not an
appropriate place to set a server-wide value.
It's the process
Hi André,
I consider this a new vote and therefore have removed your -1. If you
still are -1, please add it to STATUS again.
On Friday 14 June 2013, s...@apache.org wrote:
Author: sf
Date: Fri Jun 14 21:07:19 2013
New Revision: 1493247
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1493247
Log:
update
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 10:15 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
re-looking at this, it would be nice if we could abstract
out the callback itself as simply some event, where
the callback and the baton itself is self-contained
enuff to define what the event is... eg
Anyone opposed if I commit to trunk?
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 06:04:36PM -0400, Eric Covener wrote:
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 10:15 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
re-looking at this, it would be nice if we could abstract
out the callback itself as simply some event, where
the
On 15 Jun 2013, at 12:40 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
Anyone opposed if I commit to trunk?
+1 to commit to trunk, that's where this stuff takes shape :)
Regards,
Graham
--
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 7:05 PM, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote:
On 15 Jun 2013, at 12:40 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
Anyone opposed if I commit to trunk?
+1 to commit to trunk, that's where this stuff takes shape :)
+1
On Jun 14, 2013, at 2:16 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Thursday 13 June 2013, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
On Jun 12, 2013, at 12:34 PM, s...@apache.org wrote:
Author: sf
Date: Wed Jun 12 19:34:19 2013
New Revision: 1492395
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1492395
Log:
Actually use the secret when
Thank you for your reply!
I hope you will be able answer to one more question (that is
fit to dev list and not to users list):
According to the link below mod_ldap should be compiled differently for each
LDAP SDK (OpenLDAP SDK, Novell LDAP SDK, Mozilla LDAP SDK, native Solaris LDAP
SDK or the
27 matches
Mail list logo
