On 28.06.2013 03:59, Guenter Knauf wrote:
On 28.06.2013 01:03, Rainer Jung wrote:
Hi Daniel and/or Günter,
can you have a look at the trunk CHANGES file and move the lua items
that should now be in 2.4 to the 2.4 CHANGES file? We forgot that when
we synced 2.4 with trunk and it would be nice
Hi,
There has been lately some attention to perfect forward secrecy in TLS,
mainly due to an article on netcraft:
http://news.netcraft.com/archives/2013/06/25/ssl-intercepted-today-decrypted-tomorrow.html
What worries me is that apache still fixes the DH group size to 1024
bit. If one uses an
Hi,
I agree that the configuration of DH parameters should be possible from
within Apache. Ideally the configuration should allow the size of random
DH Parameters to be chosen and also allow the user to provide a
preconfigured DH Parameter file.
This patch should be included into 2.2 and
How about making ECDH parameters configurable from within Apache too?
On 28/06/13 09:57, MikeM wrote:
Hi,
I agree that the configuration of DH parameters should be possible from
within Apache. Ideally the configuration should allow the size of random
DH Parameters to be chosen and also allow
It could be done, yes.
However, it's slightly less necessary, as right now prime256v1 curve
is the default one, and it's a secure one (until Dan Bernstein
publishes his paper about NIST curves).
On high-volume websites, some may be tempted to switch to prime224v1
if it was possible; it's twice as
On 28/06/2013 10:31, Rob Stradling wrote:
How about making ECDH parameters configurable from within Apache too?
The current technique of hard coding the ECDH parameters isn't correct but it's
the best release versions of OpenSSL can do.
The unreleased OpenSSL 1.0.2 can be configured to use
On Jun 28, 2013, at 2:18 AM, Rainer Jung rainer.j...@kippdata.de wrote:
On 28.06.2013 03:59, Guenter Knauf wrote:
On 28.06.2013 01:03, Rainer Jung wrote:
Hi Daniel and/or Günter,
can you have a look at the trunk CHANGES file and move the lua items
that should now be in 2.4 to the 2.4
Just wanted to know the opinion of some of you who are on email today.
[ ] stay at apr-util 1.4.1 (last 1.4 release)
[ ] jump up to apr-util 1.5.2 (now that it is more stable)
William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
Just wanted to know the opinion of some of you who are on email today.
[ ] stay at apr-util 1.4.1 (last 1.4 release)
[ X ] jump up to apr-util 1.5.2 (now that it is more stable)
Regards
Rüdiger
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 1:55 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.netwrote:
Just wanted to know the opinion of some of you who are on email today.
[ ] stay at apr-util 1.4.1 (last 1.4 release)
[ ] jump up to apr-util 1.5.2 (now that it is more stable)
[X] jump up to apr-util 1.5.2 (now
On 28.06.2013 19:55, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
Just wanted to know the opinion of some of you who are on email today.
[ ] stay at apr-util 1.4.1 (last 1.4 release)
[X] jump up to apr-util 1.5.2 (now that it is more stable)
Rainer
Candidates are in http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
+/-1
[ ] Release 2.0.65 as the final 2.0 series package
TIA!
Candidates are in http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
+/-1
[ ] Release 2.2.25 (apr 1.4.8, apr-util 1.5.2)
TIA!
13 matches
Mail list logo
