Re: [VOTE] Release 2.0.65 [the final frontier]

2013-07-01 Thread Rainer Jung
On 28.06.2013 23:28, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: Candidates are in http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ +/-1 [+1] Release 2.0.65 as the final 2.0 series package +1 for release and thanks for RM. Tested on Solaris 8+10 Sparc, SuSE Linux Enterprise 10 32Bit, SLES 10+11 64 Bit, RedHat

Re: [VOTE] Release 2.2.25

2013-07-01 Thread Rainer Jung
On 28.06.2013 23:29, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: Candidates are in http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ +/-1 [+1] Release 2.2.25 (apr 1.4.8, apr-util 1.5.2) +1 to release: - Netware src artefact not checked (missing) - signature and hashes OK - key in KEYS file - gz and bz2 contents

Re: [VOTE] Release 2.0.65 [the final frontier]

2013-07-01 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 10:32 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 5:28 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.netwrote: Candidates are in http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ +/-1 [ ] Release 2.0.65 as the final 2.0 series package TIA! [+1] Release

Re: [VOTE] Release 2.2.25

2013-07-01 Thread Jeff Trawick
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 5:29 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.netwrote: Candidates are in http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ [X] Release 2.2.25 (apr 1.4.8, apr-util 1.5.2) No regression seen with 64-bit builds on FreeBSD 9 compared with 2.2.24... -- Born in Roswell... married an

Re: stop copying r-content_type to r-handler?

2013-07-01 Thread Jim Jagielski
On Jun 30, 2013, at 3:47 PM, Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com wrote: Maybe something to consider zapping from just trunk? ++1.

Re: [VOTE] Release 2.2.25

2013-07-01 Thread Jim Jagielski
So far, so good: OSX 10.8.4 (Xcode 4.6.3), Fed18 (x86_64), CentOS5 (x86_64), FreeBSD 8.3 (amd64) On Jun 28, 2013, at 5:29 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote: Candidates are in http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ +/-1 [ ] Release 2.2.25 (apr 1.4.8, apr-util 1.5.2) TIA!

Re: stop copying r-content_type to r-handler?

2013-07-01 Thread Christian Seiler
Hi there, All releases still have what I guess is an old pre-SetHandler mechanism to allow content type - handler mappings. If no r-handler has been set, but a content-type has, the content-type is copied to r-handler. As an httpd user who's reading this proposal: Currently, I like to

Re: stop copying r-content_type to r-handler?

2013-07-01 Thread Eric Covener
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Christian Seiler chris...@gmx.net wrote: Hi there, All releases still have what I guess is an old pre-SetHandler mechanism to allow content type - handler mappings. If no r-handler has been set, but a content-type has, the content-type is copied to

Re: stop copying r-content_type to r-handler?

2013-07-01 Thread Eric Covener
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Christian Seiler chris...@gmx.net wrote: Hi there, All releases still have what I guess is an old pre-SetHandler mechanism to allow content type - handler mappings. If no r-handler has

Re: stop copying r-content_type to r-handler?

2013-07-01 Thread Christian Seiler
Hi there, As an httpd user who's reading this proposal: Currently, I like to configure PHP in combination with Apache in such a way that I set the content type and then have Action application/x-httpd-php ... I don't want to use AddHandler, since then Apache also processes files ending in

Re: stop copying r-content_type to r-handler?

2013-07-01 Thread Christian Seiler
Hi, It looks like mod_actions does not recognize r-handler set to -- when r-handler is NULL, he will look directly to r-content_type, so that may be a potential way to still handle content-type based dispatch without having the content-type sit in r-handler. What you suggest would, as far

[VOTE][RESULTS] Release 2.2.25

2013-07-01 Thread wrowe
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 4:29 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote: Candidates are in http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/ +/-1 [ ] Release 2.2.25 (apr 1.4.8, apr-util 1.5.2) +1 from myself as well, looking at both Win32 and a few linux flavors. With our 5 binding +1's and

Re: [discussion] Release 2.0.65 [the final frontier]

2013-07-01 Thread wrowe
On 30 Jun 2013, Guenter Knauf observed; it seems a bit odd to me that we now roll the 2.0.65 final without having APR/APU picking up latest fixes [1][2], making this release hanging around for ever bundled with APR/APU 0.9.x versions which lack latest stuff: And in six months, some